Awesome test results!
Thanks for hard work!
I never would have expected that the top will be occupied mostly by amd ss7 processors.
I have to dust off my ss7 boards

feipoa wrote:2) Enable FastVid for CPUs which support write combining and retest effected programs (benchmarks which run at resolution >320x200 ?)
5u3 wrote:Many BIOSes enable write combining for the standard VGA range by default (as long as they detect a capable CPU).
feipoa wrote:I have added the Excel sheet to the original post. Column and row headers locked for easy viewing.
download/file.php?id=16770
To avoid having a bunch of outdated Excel documents floating around on the net, I was originally waiting until I made some updates to the file before posting it, however I do not think these updates will come anytime soon.
feipoa wrote:When using a K6-III-450, I found the 3DNow! patch to be unremarkable. Did I do something wrong? For example, using Quake II (800x600x32) as the benchmark in Win98SE, I obtained
ATI Rage 128 VR 32 MB
38.7 fps before 3DNow! patch
40.0 fps after 3DNow! patch
3DLabs Oxygen VX1 32 MB
29.2 fps before 3DNow! patch
30.4 fps after 3DNow! patch
NVIDIA TNT2 M64 16 MB
28.7 fps before 3DNow! patch
29.3 fps after 3DNow! patch
NVIDIA TNT 16 MB
41.5 fps before 3DNow! patch
42.2 fps after 3DNow! patch
Matrox G450 32 MB
20.1 fps before 3DNow! patch
20.0 fps after 3DNow! patch
GeForce2 MX400 64 MB
48.8 fps before 3DNow! patch
53.7 fps after 3DNow! patch
Voodoo Banshee 16 MB
Would not run with 3DNow! optimisations when using 3dfx-glide mode.
Return to General Old Hardware
Users browsing this forum: appiah4, Batyra, LunarG, NevilClavain, quicknick and 10 guests