I voted Out, for various reasons, as did most of the people I know. I think it's the right decision, as the EU is toxic, corrupt, unelected, answers to no one, and has never been audited, despite the huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge amount of questionable (ahem) decisions and financial 'irregularities' . And Britain pays £55 million PER DAY to remain a member, gets almost no say in British border control (why should an unelected, self-serving, non-British organisation have a say in who we let in, including them forcing us to let in known criminals and potential terrorists?), actually just google to see the retarded deal Britain has with the EU.
Yes, the EU is great in principle (principle being if it were run by democratically elected people who were answerable for their actions and did everything in the open), but the reality is that it' simply a corrupt organisation that cares nothing for the many millions of people who belong to the member countries, instead concentrating on making it's ruling elite and their associated business colleagues very wealthy.
And regarding the vote, if the losing side had won by the same amount, they would not now be saying "The deciding votes were too few, let's vote again", as they are saying now. And they are now claiming that the Out voters only won due to mainly old age people who are racist. Seriously, goole that too. But the referendum was fought very badly by both sides, as the Out party didn't put forward many arguments for leaving, and the IN party put even fewer, and mainly just talked about money, ignoring the fact that most British voters are worried about the unlimited immigration of *anyone*, even convicted rapists and murderers (apparently it's now racist to want to ban a convicted murderer from entering your country, doesn't matter if he's black or white, you're racist if you don't let him in - pathetic), for example.
But the In party also put forward *lots* of celebrities, politicians, and bankers (you know, the ones who screwed up the world's finances and didn't get punished but instead got huge bonuses) to say how we should stay in. But (a) they didn't actually give concrete reasons why we should stay in (just made up or vague 'facts about what would happen if we left, including war (seriously, for the third time, I say google for this), and (b) why would we poor, who make up 98% of the British population, think that those celebrities, politicians, and bankers (who are all wealthy, and don't have the same problems as us) would know or even care what we want.
The In party also did everything they could to make voting Out look like it said you (the voter) was a brandead racist. Instead of actually, you know, giving us good reasons to vote In. And how can we not assume that that was because there were no good reasons for poor people to vote in.
And now that the Out voters won, we're all apparently too stupid to have understood the question, only voted Out because we hate everyone foreign, and the difference in the IN and Out votes is now so small that we should have a re-vote. And yet the In people don't say why it is that if so small a number of deciding votes is so bad, then why didn't they say BEFORE the election that more than 2% (or whatever) of the votes would be needed to make an acceptable and final result.
The fact is Britain is better out of the EU, but quite a few rich people will be losing a tiny few percent of their wealth, and so they're desperately backtracking now in the hopes of another election, but I really can't see it happening, thankfully.