VOGONS


First post, by computergeek92

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Just how bad performing was the slower running cpu L2 cache on the Slot A Athlons faster than 700MHz?

From Wikipedia:

"It became increasingly difficult to reliably run an external processor cache to match the processor speeds being released—and in fact it became impossible. Thus initially the Level 2 cache ran at half of the CPU clock speed up to 700 MHz (350 MHz cache). Faster Slot-A processors had to compromise further and run at 2/5 (up to 850 MHz, 340 MHz cache) or 1/3 (up to 1 GHz, 333 MHz cache)."

Dedicated Windows 95 Aficionado for good reasons:
http://toastytech.com/evil/setup.html

Reply 1 of 1, by Thandor

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

It depends on the application. I did benchmarks which include, among others, a 1000C (DDR266) and a 850 (DDR200) on a SiS745 which you can find here: thandor.net - Athlon 1000.

The 1000C clearly wins but it also has the advantage of a higher FSB and newer platform. The 850 'Thunderbird' with equal FSB speeds as the Classic 1000 is sometimes able to catch up.

thandor.net - hardware
And the rest of us would be carousing the aisles, stuffing baloney.