I didn't think it was possible to be slower than 82865G, but SiS proved me wrong.

What color is that case? It looks like it might be white or beige, but the lighting is weird. I have that exact case, but in black.

Haha, that's a great idea testing integrated GPUs 😀

Its a bright white, very clean too

I have IBM ThinkCentre 8183 with Pentium IV 3.0 Prescott and 1 GB 400 Mhz Single Channel RAM, and I have i865 integrated graphics and I haved only 2703 points on 3DMark2001.

That photoshopped Sarah Michelle Gellar and Windows XP logo desktop background brings back memories of teenage friends using similar "themes"/backgrounds to signify that they have hit puberty 🤣 .

wouldnt you add some more GUI/2d-ish tests? i mean noones gonna play nfs with this anyway?

mrau wrote:

wouldnt you add some more GUI/2d-ish tests? i mean noones gonna play nfs with this anyway?

What other benchmarks are of interest? I only really know of 3dmark

An embedded G200 is probably slower. Brilliant at the time, but running a modern OS it's glacially slow at higher resolutions, especially as it runs at a horrid PCI-e 1.0 1x..

ill admit i dont know any contemporary test that would fill in the gap, there was a test suite for 2d from the makers of the 3dmark, but the last real 2d test? no idea

I want to say Ziff-Davis WinBench99 😀

was that not very mass torage limited?

Some results with Intel GMA 900 and SiS 630 posted in the 3DMark01 Mega Thread.

Kamerat wrote:

Increased score to 524 3Dmarks, 39% faster than the first run at 377 3DMarks. :cool: Removed one stick of RAM, now only running […]
Show full quote

Increased score to 524 3Dmarks, 39% faster than the first run at 377 3DMarks. 😎
Removed one stick of RAM, now only running 256MB. (This is the reason for most of the increase.)
Made a few other BIOS tweaks.
Changed the driver to the one supplied by Windows.
Had to disable the "High Polygon Count" tests because the Windows driver makes the system crash running it.
Increased the core frequency of the IGP from 101MHz to 175MHz. 😈 (This only gained a few points, looks like the IGP is heavily starving for memory bandwith.)

Kamerat wrote:

Some overclocked Intel GMA action :lol: […]
Show full quote

Some overclocked Intel GMA action 🤣

Lenovo 3000 C100
Intel Pentium M 745A @ 2556MHz
Intel GMA 900 @ 400MHz
2GB PC6400 dual channel @ 284MHz DDR
Windows XP Pro SP3

The Intel i815 Solano scores about 550. The Via CLE266 scores about 640. This is with CPUs in range c. 900-1200 MHz.

Haven't got a picture, but 16451 for a AMD 880G chipset board with a Ahtlon II X2 processor 😀

Thought I'd try on a spare laptop at work:

Sony VAIO PCG‑GRT390ZP 16"
2.8GHz Pentium 4 (Northwood, 533MHz FSB)
1.25GB DDR-333
GeForce FX Go5600
Windows XP Pro SP3

2.20GHz Core 2 Dual
2GB of RAM, 1.97 after video share
Intel G965 Express chipset family (Intel GMA X3000)
Motherboard: Intel Shrewsbury DG965SS (2 PCI, 1 PCI-E x1, 1 PCI-E x16, 4 DDR2 DIMM, Audio, Video, Gigabit LAN, IEEE-1394)
120GB Western Digital SATA HDD

ASUS A7V8X-MX SE with Barton XP 2600+ (stock clock speed probably).

Gigabyte GA-8SIMLP with Willamette P4 @1.7ghz

Dell Inspiron 531 wow my p4 with integrated intel is beating this.