Sandi1987 wrote:USB works in Windows 95?
DosFreak wrote:Both as long as Windows isn't booted.
There was a bug in non-English versions of Windows 95B, but that is easily fixed.mrau wrote:is it just me or did one of the windows versions have a rather low amount of conventional memory for DOS programs to share?
Jorpho wrote:There was a bug in non-English versions of Windows 95B, but that is easily fixed.mrau wrote:is it just me or did one of the windows versions have a rather low amount of conventional memory for DOS programs to share?
http://www.mdgx.com/osr2.htm#IOFIX
mrau wrote:DosFreak wrote:Both as long as Windows isn't booted.
epic"i like you, as long as you sit in an inescapable jail cell in the middle of sahara without water"
is it just me or did one of the windows versions have a rather low amount of conventional memory for DOS programs to share?
leileilol wrote:No DX9-reliant card supports Windows 95.
mrau wrote:Jorpho wrote:There was a bug in non-English versions of Windows 95B, but that is easily fixed.mrau wrote:is it just me or did one of the windows versions have a rather low amount of conventional memory for DOS programs to share?
http://www.mdgx.com/osr2.htm#IOFIX
sometimes its freaky what ancient stuff you guys know just from the top of your beautiful eggshaped heads
i remmeber os/2 was actually just the contrary of this - the reached theoretical free memory of 700kb+; no idea if programs really could use that though;
Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 2 guests