Reply 100 of 192, by shamino
- Rank
- l33t
Our first x86 PC was a 386SX-16MHz. It was my parents' deal really, but I regret it. That machine was underpowered for games within the 1st year of ownership, and hopeless after that.
Every try playing X-Wing on a 386SX-16? I adopted a gameplay style that managed the framerate so the missions wouldn't become unplayable.
Ultima 7? I can't believe how patient I was with that game. Ever have those dreams where you have trouble moving and everything is deliberate and labored? That's Ultima 7 on a 386SX-16.
PCChips 486 VLB motherboard - This was the basis of my family's first home-build PC. We bought the cheapest 486 board we could find. Yep, we ended up with a variation of that PCChips 486 board that's discussed at length on redhill.
Any SVGA game would crash too much to be playable, most older VGA games were kinda stable but not really. Ultima 7 was the worst - it crashed within seconds. And this is why I had to take a vacation from Ultima 7 and didn't beat it until even later, by which time it was more a sense of overdue obligation than enjoyment.
VIA MVP3 and K6-3 system - Coming from our socket-7 Cyrix (which was actually a good computer), I was trying to spec out an economical upgrade. I don't know what the prices were anymore, but I should have tried to get a 440BX board w/ a Celeron 300A. Bonus is that this could have also supported a significant CPU upgrade in the future. But I didn't know anything about overclocking back then nor was I comfortable with the idea.
Today though, I kind of like this super-7 system and am currently playing around with it. So maybe I don't totally regret it.
And in today's market, the K6-3 is more valuable I guess. I can (and have) acquired the Intel stuff cheaply. A pyrrhic victory.
Gigabyte GA-790XTA-UD4 (AM3) This is still my current "modern" system. The first of these boards that I bought was failing to recognize the VID from the CPU and was only running Vcore at 1.0v. Thus it was stable if I underclocked the CPU but otherwise it was unstable. Such a simple defect should have been caught at the factory. I've seen a picture of a Gigabyte factory tour (the same tour my avatar pic is from, actually) where they show people testing motherboards. Either they only do that when the cameras show up, or they just POST test and don't actually read the health monitor info. Make lesser mistakes, Gigabyte.
The replacement board (from the retail store) came with bent pins inside the box. This board seemed to work and I kept it, but I discovered much later that S3 standby (suspend to RAM) does not work on this board. It always wakes up dead, even with all settings at safe defaults. S3 standby simply does not work.
I'm also having chronic problems with an apparent PSU overload when I switch the system on. Occasionally the PSU will trip overload and shut down, forcing me to unplug the PSU to reset it and try again. I want to punch a kitten when this happens. This has continued despite multiple changes of video cards and an upgrade from a quality 550W AcBel PSU to a quality 800W Delta PSU. I have little else to blame but the board.
Around the same time a relative bought a Gigabyte 785G based motherboard which proved to have a defective eSATA port. In a few months that board died mysteriously.
Hate to be a fanboy but I didn't have a good experience with a Gigabyte HD4350 card either. "Ultra Durable" era Gigabyte gear all seems to come broken from the factory. The game is whether you have found what's broken yet. 😀
Every inkjet printer - Who needs color. Who needs the aggravation. Laser all the way.