VOGONS


First post, by C0deHunter

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Hello all,
I just received my IDE to CF adapters in the mail, to replace my current two mechanical Hdds (WD 80GB)

51EY%2B6wF65L._SX450_.jpg

* For some odd reason, when I use both of these adapters on the *SAME* IDE Channel (One set as Master, the other one as Slave), the Slave drive can not be detected on my Abit-BH6.

* When I connect the second CF Adapter to the secondary IDE channel (where my CD-ROM is installed) it works (either as Master, or as Slave)

* I am thinking about setting the first CF adapter on primary IDE Channel and set it as Master (obviously), and connecting my CD-ROM as Slave on this very same IDE channel. (for OS: Win98SE)

And

* connecting the secondary CF adapter on the secondary IDE channel as Master (and nothing connecting to it) this is for GAMES (Win98 installed games)

Question:
Do you recommend this? I mean connecting an Hdd (CF in my case) on the same channel with a CD-ROM would not degrade performance?

There are some discussions here, but I thought I consult with you guys first!

httphttps://www.vogons.org/posting.php?mode=post&f=46\

and

https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=784762

Thanks!

PIII-800E | Abit BH-6 | GeForce FX 5200 | 64MB SD-RAM PC100 | AWE64 Gold | Sound Canvas 55 MKII | SoftMPU | 16GBGB Transcend CF as C:\ and 64GB Transcend CF D:\ (Games) | OS: MS-DOS 7.1-Win98SE-WinME-Win2K Pro (multi-OS menu Using System Commander 2K)

Reply 1 of 3, by realnc

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The "common wisdom" has always been to use HDs as masters and CD-ROM drives as slaves, unless you only had one HD, in which case you'd use both the HD and the CD as masters.

So in your case, you'd use the CD as a slave in whatever IDE channel you want. It doesn't matter which.

Reply 2 of 3, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Just answered on your other thread but will do it here for completeness in a slightly different way
Basically you don't want drives that you'll be using at the same time on the same IDE channel as they will have to wait for each other for the IDE cable to become free.

This is to squeeze every little bit of performance out of the system. I've come across many systems that had both on the primary channel and nothing on the secondary and were fine
The CF card with the almost instant seek time and constant read/write speed will also hide any delay that you would have had with a traditional HDD anyway.

so short answer go with whatever works!

Reply 3 of 3, by C0deHunter

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Great! thanks!
I am using a CF and real CD-ROM on Primary (Win98SE on this one)
and
another CF (standlone) on Seconday (planning to install games on this one only)

PIII-800E | Abit BH-6 | GeForce FX 5200 | 64MB SD-RAM PC100 | AWE64 Gold | Sound Canvas 55 MKII | SoftMPU | 16GBGB Transcend CF as C:\ and 64GB Transcend CF D:\ (Games) | OS: MS-DOS 7.1-Win98SE-WinME-Win2K Pro (multi-OS menu Using System Commander 2K)