Reply 1 of 6, by The Serpent Rider
- Rank
- l33t++
intel 486 DX2 66 (only intel !
AMD DX2 has exactly same performance.
I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.
Reply 2 of 6, by derSammler
Depends. Later AMD DX2 CPUs were fitted with 16 KB WB cache, so they are faster.
I need the results from everyone who has above spec, and can do the benchmark.
I'm missing words like "please" and some description, why you need it. Even if I had exactly that system, I wouldn't care doing your benchmark due to the way all this is written.
Reply 3 of 6, by mhdbox385
I need it for world peace.
Reply 4 of 6, by wiretap
- Rank
- Oldbie
5 second search on google: https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/misc/doombe … html#submission
According to that, it will get <20fps, maybe around 18fps.
In the same 5 seconds of searching, here's a video of a time demo of the requested specs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs_TTCNz_-8 --- they got 16.955 fps
Reply 5 of 6, by badmojo
- Rank
- l33t
wrote:I wouldn't care doing your benchmark due to the way all this is written.
+1, and I do have that exact system.
Life? Don't talk to me about life.
Reply 6 of 6, by The Serpent Rider
- Rank
- l33t++
Later AMD DX2 CPUs were fitted with 16 KB WB cache, so they are faster.
Those are rebranded AMD DX4 and support 3x multiplier.
I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.