The Serpent Rider wrote on Yesterday, 18:47:

RDNA2 was premiered in October 2020. Marketing refreshes with zero changes to the silicon don't really count. That's how it alwa […]
Show full quote

Ozzuneoj wrote on Yesterday, 18:29:

Compare that to RDNA 2... […]
Show full quote

Compare that to RDNA 2...

Radeon RX 6950 XT = May 10, 2022 for $1,099 USD
Radeon RX 6750 XT = May 10, 2022 for $549 USD
Radeon RX 6750 GRE = Oct 18, 2023 for $269 - $289 USD
Radeon RX 6650 XT = May 10, 2022 for $399 USD

RDNA2 was premiered in October 2020. Marketing refreshes with zero changes to the silicon don't really count. That's how it always was for both Nvidia and AMD.

GCN 1-3 were supported for 8-11 years, and GCN 4 was getting normal driver support until 2023

GCN 1.0 through 3.0 support is peculiar, because they were made on the same lithography (28nm) and had a lot of minor architecture tweaks. One of the reasons why GCN 1.0 was held alive for so long and why they all were dropped simultaneously. As for immortal Polaris, it held for so long due to the mining GPU craze.

I don't think that really changes anything I said... and believe it or not, one person's opinion on a forum doesn't determine what "counts" for all of AMD's customers. Go look at what their former\potential customers and the tech media are saying about this. Also, check the steam hardware survey:
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam … elcome-to-Steam

Before the announcement, how many AMD GPUs out of the roughly 100 listed here were getting full driver support? Only 18 (out of 29 total from AMD... mostly older IGPs) ... And how many will be getting full driver support now? Err... 5. And one of those is an IGP. And none of them are RX 9000 series. Basically, everyone in the hardware survey is using an AMD GPU based on an architecture from 2022 (if that's what we should be going by) or older. AMD is telling all of these people that their days of getting performance improvements are numbered, despite the "AMD fine wine" meme that has helped them stay relevant for the past 15 years.

Even if we assume that people are okay with their 2020 GPUs being put on the back burner, for AMD to stop providing full driver support for a $400 GPU from May of 2022, let alone ones for $550 and $1100, is a ludicrously bad move for a company in their position. They are barely a blip on the radar in the professional\business areas where Nvidia is dominating, so giving home users more reasons to avoid them for their next upgrade is beyond bone-headed.

EDIT: I should add... if they really needed to focus on the current generation (which they should), they should simply do that without making some huge announcement about not wanting to continue improving the GPUs that most of their customers are still using. It sounds like in the follow up posted earlier they have "re-worded" things a bit and are suggesting they might roll out performance improvements as the market requires. Right. 🤣. Okay, well, if they'd worded it that way from the beginning and actually intend to do that, then absolutely no one would care. These companies just do really dumb things sometimes.

AMD reversed it ...RDNA 1 and 2 will keep getting driver support for both critical updaters and game updates.

Took less than 24 hours, though technically they are still in a form of maintenance mode and game updates will be based on market demand.

Still better than a legacy mode I guess.

the glsl compiler is still probably busted for opengl2 since 2022 though. Surprisingly not a lot of noise was ever made about that, as it did affect newer games down the line (i.e. Skindeep)

Trashbytes wrote on Yesterday, 23:47:

AMD reversed it ...RDNA 1 and 2 will keep getting driver support for both critical updaters and game updates.

Took less than 24 hours, though technically they are still in a form of maintenance mode and game updates will be based on market demand.

Still better than a legacy mode I guess.

I don't know if I'd say they reversed it, but they are definitely in damage control mode.

People will still complain about this and assume that AMD is not supporting them unless they keep seeing performance improvements listed in the driver release notes. Whether AMD were actually planning to have anyone dedicated to improving the experience on RDNA 2 or not, you can bet that people will looking for it now.

Just more foot shooting from the PR department.

leileilol wrote on Today, 00:07:

the glsl compiler is still probably busted for opengl2 since 2022 though. Surprisingly not a lot of noise was ever made about that

IIRC AMD hates OpenGL and is still on the "Vulkan is its replacement" so go use that path.

Ozzuneoj wrote on Today, 00:08:

I don't know if I'd say they reversed it, but they are definitely in damage control mode. […]
Show full quote

Trashbytes wrote on Yesterday, 23:47:

AMD reversed it ...RDNA 1 and 2 will keep getting driver support for both critical updaters and game updates.

Took less than 24 hours, though technically they are still in a form of maintenance mode and game updates will be based on market demand.

Still better than a legacy mode I guess.

I don't know if I'd say they reversed it, but they are definitely in damage control mode.

People will still complain about this and assume that AMD is not supporting them unless they keep seeing performance improvements listed in the driver release notes. Whether they were actually planning to have anyone dedicated to improving the experience on RDNA 2 or not, you can bet that people will looking for it now.

Just more foot shooting from the PR department.

True .. but I watched a Video from one of the better Tech guys who said even older nVidia GPUs don't see much performance improvements from newer drivers after the first couple of years once the tech has matured and even demonstrated this with a ton of data to back it up. (There are exceptions but the majority holds true here)

I feel that RDNA 1 was fine to push to legacy, the tech doesn't have full hardware support for DX12 U features but RDNA 2 ...that should have never been moved to legacy or maintenance mode, its still being sold new in stores and has full support for all DX12 U features.

I feel that this has come down because UDNA is getting closer to full release and they dont want to be dedicating resuorces to the older RDNA tech.

Ozzuneoj wrote on Yesterday, 23:42:

and believe it or not, one person's opinion on a forum doesn't determine what "counts" for all of AMD's customers

That's not my opinion. That's how both Nvidia and AMD were putting their old stuff to EOL for ages. In big chunks, regardless of their actual date of release. AMD just handles this more poorly.

Trashbytes wrote on Today, 00:09:

IIRC AMD hates OpenGL and is still on the "Vulkan is its replacement" so go use that path.

AMD has primarily treated OpenGL as a professional API, so everything related to it is usually reserved for FirePro drivers. "SMP support in OpenGL for plebeians? Not on my watch!". ATi did the same thing, but they had to "compromise", due to id Software shadow looming over them.

I feel that this has come down because UDNA is getting closer to full release and they dont want to be dedicating resuorces to the older RDNA tech.

One of the reasons to skip RX 9000 series, because it's probably going to be another TeraScale to GCN transition period driver negligence.

That being said, everything here really concerns only Windows. On Linux side AMD just gave up and now fully invested in supporting open-source drivers, which even have software ray-tracing implementation for Vega.

I will likely be moving the 9070XT I bought over to a CachyOS Rig soon, the more I learn about the truly nasty security shit and AI Enshitification MS is adding to recent Win11 releases is making me not want to run that OS outside of a VM where I can sandbox what it phones home with.

Id use a nVidia GPU for that but their driver support on Linux is truly abysmal compared to AMD and the 9070XT on Linux already supports FSR4/FG via the latest Mesa versions.

I don't fully know if GPU pass through is supported via VM for the 9070XT but some quick reading suggests its possible via Arch which CachyOS is based on.

Trashbytes wrote on Today, 00:15:

Ozzuneoj wrote on Today, 00:08:

I don't know if I'd say they reversed it, but they are definitely in damage control mode. […]
Show full quote

Trashbytes wrote on Yesterday, 23:47:

AMD reversed it ...RDNA 1 and 2 will keep getting driver support for both critical updaters and game updates.

Took less than 24 hours, though technically they are still in a form of maintenance mode and game updates will be based on market demand.

Still better than a legacy mode I guess.

I don't know if I'd say they reversed it, but they are definitely in damage control mode.

People will still complain about this and assume that AMD is not supporting them unless they keep seeing performance improvements listed in the driver release notes. Whether they were actually planning to have anyone dedicated to improving the experience on RDNA 2 or not, you can bet that people will looking for it now.

Just more foot shooting from the PR department.

True .. but I watched a Video from one of the better Tech guys who said even older nVidia GPUs don't see much performance improvements from newer drivers after the first couple of years once the tech has matured and even demonstrated this with a ton of data to back it up. (There are exceptions but the majority holds true here)

Absolutely. People aren't generally benchmarking their games and nitpicking over performance improvements when they do updates, especially for cards that have been out for a couple years. We talk about this all the time even with retro hardware... if you want the best driver for a card, don't use the last one to support it. Use one from when the GPU was still near top of the line.

And this is exactly why AMD should have either not made this change internally or just said nothing at all about it. They have said the whole time that they would continue to do bug fixes, which is really the most important thing. With that, one can assume (maybe optimistically) that if a bug causes a game to run especially poorly, they would probably fix that too.

But, now that they have come right out and told people that their GPU (which has nearly the same feature set as the current generation, and which they may have bought 3 years ago for $1100) is no longer going to get the same attention as others that are hardly any different from the customers' perspective, it just looks really really bad and damages customer trust. Worst of all, it gives the impression (correct or not) that AMD can't support their products as long as Nvidia, which obviously impacts their perceived value.

This is less about customers actually losing something they would normally have, and more about AMD blowing another opportunity to build or maintain a good reputation with their customer base.

Trashbytes wrote on Today, 00:15:

I feel that RDNA 1 was fine to push to legacy, the tech doesn't have full hardware support for DX12 U features but RDNA 2 ...that should have never been moved to legacy or maintenance mode, its still being sold new in stores and has full support for all DX12 U features.

I feel that this has come down because UDNA is getting closer to full release and they dont want to be dedicating resuorces to the older RDNA tech.

Yeah, less people care about RDNA 1, for sure, and the lack of ray tracing and other features gives it a clear distinction from the newer architectures. It just boggles the mind why they would drop support for RDNA 2 at the same time AND then go out and announce it to the world.

They could just... you know... Reassign the person\people who would be working on optimizations for these cards and have them focus on other things unless there is a major issue. There. Done. No one cares and there is no PR disaster.

Yep .. they did what AMD is well know for doing ...snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Meanwhile nVidia shareholders are laughing all the way to the bank.

Like I mentioned, nothing new here. That's how typically AMD operate their graphics division.
I just checked something. Radeon X1950 Pro (very popular ATi card at the time) was released in October 2006 and AMD pulled the plug inm March 2009, so less than 3 years. And the whole X1000 series architecture was ditched in less than 4 years. That's some remarkable consistency!

The current rug pull from RDNA2 owners probably has something to do with AMD prioritizing AI business now.

So both AMD and NVIDIA suck in their own ways.

Trashbytes wrote on Today, 07:11:

Meanwhile nVidia shareholders are laughing all the way to the bank.

nah; fuck ai, fuck upscaled "4k" and fuck fake framerates. and on the cpu side fuck intel too 😀

Trashbytes wrote on Today, 00:15:

I feel that this has come down because UDNA is getting closer to full release and they dont want to be dedicating resuorces to the older RDNA tech.

RDNA4 is nothing like previous RDNA-s, it’s more of an early UDNA build. They abandon other RDNA-s sooner and RDNA4 lives quite long life.