VOGONS


First post, by Marco

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hi all,

I use currently ms client 3.0 to access smb shares. My smb hosts won’t provide ipx.

I wonder if there is any reason to go for ms lan manager for this requirement? I couldn’t find direct comparisons for both products. Any ideas? Speed? Memory usage?

Thanks a lot

1) VLSI SCAMP 311 | 386SX25@TI486SXLC2-50@63 | 16MB | CL-GD5434 | CT2830| SCC-1 | MT32 | WDC160GB/7200/8MB | Fast-SCSI AHA 1542CF + BlueSCSI v2/15k U320
2) SIS486 | 486DX/2 66(@80) | 32MB | TGUI9440 | LAPC-I

Reply 1 of 6, by maxtherabbit

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The final versions of them are functionality equivalent

Reply 2 of 6, by Marco

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Oh ok that’s a good and for me concluding answer. Thanks a lot

1) VLSI SCAMP 311 | 386SX25@TI486SXLC2-50@63 | 16MB | CL-GD5434 | CT2830| SCC-1 | MT32 | WDC160GB/7200/8MB | Fast-SCSI AHA 1542CF + BlueSCSI v2/15k U320
2) SIS486 | 486DX/2 66(@80) | 32MB | TGUI9440 | LAPC-I

Reply 3 of 6, by Grzyb

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
maxtherabbit wrote on 2024-12-17, 22:38:

The final versions of them are functionality equivalent

Final version of LAN Manager is 2.2c, right?
I had some issues with that - AFAIR some file names appearing in lowercase instead of uppercase, which confused Norton Commander and/or Volkov Commander.

But no such problems with Microsoft Network Client 3.0.

Nie rzucim ziemi, skąd nasz root!

Reply 4 of 6, by maxtherabbit

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Grzyb wrote on 2024-12-18, 01:09:
Final version of LAN Manager is 2.2c, right? I had some issues with that - AFAIR some file names appearing in lowercase instead […]
Show full quote
maxtherabbit wrote on 2024-12-17, 22:38:

The final versions of them are functionality equivalent

Final version of LAN Manager is 2.2c, right?
I had some issues with that - AFAIR some file names appearing in lowercase instead of uppercase, which confused Norton Commander and/or Volkov Commander.

But no such problems with Microsoft Network Client 3.0.

Yes it is. I did notice the redirectors were slightly different between them

Reply 6 of 6, by Marco

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Much appreciated. Great comparison. Thanks

1) VLSI SCAMP 311 | 386SX25@TI486SXLC2-50@63 | 16MB | CL-GD5434 | CT2830| SCC-1 | MT32 | WDC160GB/7200/8MB | Fast-SCSI AHA 1542CF + BlueSCSI v2/15k U320
2) SIS486 | 486DX/2 66(@80) | 32MB | TGUI9440 | LAPC-I