VOGONS


First post, by vindasal

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I'm rebuilding XP on a new drive, using SATA drives in IDE compatibility mode for ease of use (also run 2000 at times) but I've noticed that the options for good drives are lessening. I'm aiming to go for 2TB for dual booting, 1TB each. The only problem here is that it's hard to get 2TB 7200RPM drives that aren't SMR. The only CMR 2TB drives I can find are 5400RPM. I see that some older WD Black drives were good, but they're all old stock by now.

So this leads to the question, is SMR vs CMR really a big deal with an XP boot drive, and if it is, is it worth downgrading to 5400RPM from 7200RPM just to get CMR? I would err on the side of the 7200RPM SMR, because recently I notice that some games like UT2004 struggle with slow drives (game sort of stops when a new sound plays for the first time) but if the pagefile is on an SMR drive, that could be problematic too. I do have 4GB RAM on this system, but I see the pagefile still gets used a bit.

SSDs have become unobtainium due to prices.

Reply 1 of 2, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

CMR drive, if at all possible.

Reply 2 of 2, by megatron-uk

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

SMR write/rewrite performance is abysmal.

They're really only any good for mainly-read purposes. I would say that as a primary OS+data drive it would be just about the worst case for such a drive as all of those tiny little writes that the OS does will be magnified by the track write/rewrite operation of the drive.

I've a couple of smr drives and I only use them for occasional write, mostly read operations - things like backing up my GOG.com installers and then installing them from that drive again instead of downloading 50gigs of data again.

You can hear the drive rewriting tracks in the background after writing new data. The latency can be much worse than a cmr drive, let alone an SSD.

My collection database and technical wiki:
https://www.target-earth.net