VOGONS


First post, by rmay635703

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I rarely see a low cost , relatively low latency freesync lcd that is more than just plain FHD.

I found a cheap Ultrawide (2560x1080) that has DisplayPort, USBC , HDMI ~$60

I have older standard FHD LCDs that I can send legacy resolutions up to 1600x1200 (scales it with black bars or stretched) but they have very poor latency at all resolutions native or otherwise. (320x200+)

Has anyone tried one of these screens at all the typical non-native resolutions including 16:9 and 4:3?

Some folks claimed they have a good osd options but not sure if running a very low vga resolution (for example) would have a massive latency penalty.

Would like to be surprised to find a rather run of the mill low end modern screen that isn’t total garbage for legacy but they almost never advertise.

Even though it’s resolution is disappointing I could get down to 1 screen if it did everything, I even have a vga converter but don’t think that would be a good experience.

Reply 1 of 4, by jh80

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Check the manual and see if it supports forced 4:3 aspect ratio (usually one of the OSD settings). Without that it will certainly be limited.

I have several 27-inch Dell monitors that I really like for DOS. One is S2721DGF, which is no longer made, but I just bought a S2725QC and it's nice. 4K resolution, freesync, 120 Hz, can force 4:3. It's a business-oriented monitor rather than gaming, though, so there might be better options there. I don't know if all Dell monitors support forced 4:3 but maybe worth checking, as there might be cheaper options (the S2725QC is a bit expensive).

Don't waste money on bad VGA converters, though. Invest in an OSSC or similar. There's no easy/cheap way to properly do the VGA -> HDMI conversion that you'll have to do on a modern LCD. The OSSC adds no latency at all.

Reply 2 of 4, by rmay635703

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

My issue is the widescreens I have that support legacy 4:3 don’t mention support let alone forced aspect in the manual.

They just work and have manual screen geometry adjustments .

That LG only mentions 1:1 mode or scaled, manual lists many legacy resolutions but does not Mention forced aspect

Reply 3 of 4, by jh80

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
rmay635703 wrote on 2026-05-05, 16:46:

My issue is the widescreens I have that support legacy 4:3 don’t mention support let alone forced aspect in the manual.

They just work and have manual screen geometry adjustments .

That LG only mentions 1:1 mode or scaled, manual lists many legacy resolutions but does not Mention forced aspect

The manual seems to make it clear that there is no forced 4:3 under the aspect ratio options (p. 12), and I also don't see any options for manually adjusting the display size, so I don't think this is a good monitor for DOS. At least, not for use with a simple upscaler like the OSSC.

It's more common these days for monitors to not support forced 4:3, so I wouldn't buy anything that didn't clearly list it in the settings section of the manual. Most consumers don't seem to care about forced 4:3, so it is almost never advertised or listed under tech specs, even when it is available as a setting.

Dell's ultrawide monitors do support forced 4:3 (at least the ones I checked), but they're quite a bit more expensive. However, they're generally all-around much better monitors than that LG.

Reply 4 of 4, by rmay635703

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Bleh I completely managed to miss the aspect ratio mention.

Three of the four aspect selections all seem to be almost identical with minor differences.

My old lcd widescreens at least allow some level of manual horizontal and vertical resizing and positioning.

I never thought I would see the day that monitors became less multisync with minimal ability to manually adjust the image.

Years ago (circa 2006) some sites were providing the ability to program the junction board of lcd monitors to add missing resolutions and custom user created features. It turned out many features on higher end LCDs could be added to cheaper screens.

Feels like we need to go back to that, too bad everything is landlocked in Russia 4pda