VOGONS


First post, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Looking at my pile of 'dead, don't know why' PCBs, I've come to the conclusion it's time to up my game when it comes to diagnosis of electronics - it's time to get an oscilloscope.

Now, looking as a beginner the world of oscilloscopes (and logic analyzers) is bewilderingly complex, and expensive enough that you really don't want to purchase a red herring, even second hand. I just might be able to get my hands on some surplus at work, but same applies there - it's unlikely I'd be able to get a second device if it turns out I wangled the wrong one first time. Tektronix has some excellent documentation with advice online, but of course it applies to new scopes and mainly their products:
https://www.tek.com/document/online/primer/xy … g-oscilloscopes

Based on the recommendation there, it appears I should choose an oscilloscope with 5x the bandwidth of the frequencies I want to be able to sample and 1/5 of the lowest signal rise times I want to be able to see. The latter seems to indicate far higher bandwidths than I would need based on frequency alone:
TEK-XYZ-Primer-C3-Figure47-640x303.png

Sample rate should also be at least 2.5x frequency of signal, preferably 5x.

Waveform capture rate and record time also sound relevant, but it's less clear which values I would need.

Now, what I want to be able to do - at a high level - is to diagnose faulty PCBs, i.e. motherboards, ISA, VLB and PCI cards, and to find pinouts for undocumented headers, and to be able to do this for stuff from the 1980s and 1990s. Thinking logically but naively, that sounds like a requirement to be able to capture stuff up to 50MHz (slowest speed of an So7 CPU bus, fastest VLB speed), which would translate to an oscilloscope bandwidth of at least 250MHz. If that ends up being prohibitively expensive, 25MHz (486 CPU bus, slowest VLB and PCI speed) would be plan B, at 125MHz bandwidth, and if even that's not feasible, I might consider starting with ISA bus speeds of 8MHz, which should be possible with 40MHz bandwidth. But... that would also mean TTL, and the table suggests I'd nede 175MHz for that, and 230Mhz for CMOS. It sort of sounds like I sould be aiming for 250MHz bandwidth regardless, unless I need to do 5x that 230MHz as well and it ends up at 1.15GHz 😮

Three questions to the more experienced :
1) does my logic sound sound, or am I missing something fundamental? What specs would you recommend for the applications I mention? How about other specs than just bandwidth/rise time?
2) given those specs, what sort of device should I be looking for? And what would sensible compromises/concessions be if I want something cheaper than the ideal device?
3) are there good online step-by-step guides to actually using one for the purposes I'm looking at?

Reply 1 of 4, by maxtherabbit

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

sounds like you actually want a logic analyzer not a scope...

Reply 2 of 4, by HanJammer

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I have the same dilema, although I'm not as technical about it as you are (I'm not really sure it is as important in amateur lab - it's not like lower bandwidth oscilloscope will be useless for higher frequency stuff and generally you will find decent devices with 250MHz bandwidth and 4 channels for 500 Euro or less, but some of them have important features other do not, so I prefer to compare them from this perspective - what features do you really need?
- how many channels? (2 channels or more is a must! - you frequently need to compare some stuff)
- it has to be DSO for your purpose - everything else is pretty much useless
- how much space do you have for it?
- do you really need separate device, or maybe USB oscilloscope like the Hantek 6254BC (which is 4 channel, 250MHz 1GSa/s oscilloscope and costs under 200 Euro) will be sufficient? Or maybe even some small portable one?

Of course there is also a question how much money do want to spend and if it has to be a new device. While Hantek, Rigol, Uni-T devices are pretty decent - it maybe more cost effective to buy some older, used device from a brand like Tektronix.

maxtherabbit wrote:

sounds like you actually want a logic analyzer not a scope...

Thing is oscilloscope can be used as a logic analyzer, but the other way around is not possible. Oscilloscope will come in handy as a diagnostic tool for VRCs, PSUs and in general - analogue circuits in PCs too.

New items (October/November 2022) -> My Items for Sale
I8v8PGb.jpg

Reply 3 of 4, by BloodyCactus

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

remeber with old systems were all parallel bus, logic analyzer needs lot of parallel channels, modern systems are all serial bus stuff so couple of channels is fine.

just get a cheap rigol and apply the options hack for bandwidth+memory. 1054z. the hacks are still iffy on the new MSO5000 models. 1054z is known.

for logic analyzer, old ones, I have a 1670G with 132 channels. it does me fine.

--/\-[ Stu : Bloody Cactus :: [ https://bloodycactus.com :: http://kråketær.com ]-/\--

Reply 4 of 4, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
HanJammer wrote:

I have the same dilema, although I'm not as technical about it as you are (I'm not really sure it is as important in amateur lab - it's not like lower bandwidth oscilloscope will be useless for higher frequency stuff and generally you will find decent devices with 250MHz bandwidth and 4 channels for 500 Euro or less, but some of them have important features other do not, so I prefer to compare them from this perspective - what features do you really need?
- how many channels? (2 channels or more is a must! - you frequently need to compare some stuff)
- it has to be DSO for your purpose - everything else is pretty much useless

Yep

- how much space do you have for it?
- do you really need separate device, or maybe USB oscilloscope like the Hantek 6254BC (which is 4 channel, 250MHz 1GSa/s oscilloscope and costs under 200 Euro) will be sufficient? Or maybe even some small portable one?

Space isn't really an issue, if standalone I can plop it on a shelf above my workspace. All things being equal I'd probably prefer standalone, but if there's a big price difference USB is fine.

Of course there is also a question how much money do want to spend and if it has to be a new device. While Hantek, Rigol, Uni-T devices are pretty decent - it maybe more cost effective to buy some older, used device from a brand like Tektronix.

Ideally I'd like to get it for free or as close to it as possible , which may be an option (one of our engineering departments has subject matter that has been upgraded from max 868MHz to 1.2GHz and beyond, so their tooling has as well, maybe they have some surplus old stuff 😉 ). Failing that though budget is very much an issue and "as cheap as I can get away with" would be the case.

Hantek has a standalone 200MHz device (DSO5202P) for EUR 225 on Ali - if I'm paying and I don't know better that's the sort of thing I would be considering.

maxtherabbit wrote:

sounds like you actually want a logic analyzer not a scope...

Thing is oscilloscope can be used as a logic analyzer, but the other way around is not possible. Oscilloscope will come in handy as a diagnostic tool for VRCs, PSUs and in general - analogue circuits in PCs too.

Indeed. I wouldn't be surprised if most of the stuff I end up doing with it is analogue. I certainly can't afford /justify two separate devices at this time.