VOGONS


Socket 478 WinXP

Topic actions

First post, by Vendest

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I see that P4 with socket 478 are mostly used for Win98, but it is my WinXP rig below.
P4P800 with P4 3.0GHz and 2GB DDR400 (2 Dual Channels)
GeForce 6800 GS 256mb by XFX for Graphics and SB X-Fi for sound.
The C drive is set to RAID0 thru dedicated VIA IDE RAID controller with 2 IDE 80gb Seagate HDD (ATA100)
Another 80gb for storage as D drive.
The build scores 4424 in PCMark04.

A minor upgrade to come from P4 3.0GHz (L2 512kb) to 3.2GHz (L2 1mb) and I would like to install a decent cooling for the CPU as I am using stock cooling.

Playing thru C&C: Tiberium Wars!

Reply 1 of 2, by H3nrik V!

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Vendest wrote on 2023-07-22, 05:45:

A minor upgrade to come from P4 3.0GHz (L2 512kb) to 3.2GHz (L2 1mb) and I would like to install a decent cooling for the CPU as I am using stock cooling.

You may get disappointed from that upgrade, as the 3.2/1mb uses the Prescott core rather than the 3.0/512kb which uses Northwood core. Clock for clock, Northwood is a bit faster than Prescott.

FWIW, I also ran WinXP on Pentium 4 back in the day.

If it's dual it's kind of cool ... 😎

--- GA586DX --- P2B-DS --- BP6 ---

Please use the "quote" option if asking questions to what I write - it will really up the chances of me noticing 😀

Reply 2 of 2, by dr_st

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
H3nrik V! wrote on 2023-07-22, 06:54:

FWIW, I also ran WinXP on Pentium 4 back in the day.

So did I, and in fact my primary system built at the end of 2004 was very similar to the OP's:

>> P4P800 with P4 3.0GHz and 2GB DDR400 (2 Dual Channels)
--> I had P4P800-E and started with 1GB RAM; eventually upgraded to 2GB and as the mobo died, replaced it with a P4C800-E

>> GeForce 6800 GS 256mb by XFX for Graphics and SB X-Fi for sound.
--> Started with a FX5200 (not for gaming),

H3nrik V! wrote on 2023-07-22, 06:54:

You may get disappointed from that upgrade, as the 3.2/1mb uses the Prescott core rather than the 3.0/512kb which uses Northwood core. Clock for clock, Northwood is a bit faster than Prescott.

eventually upgraded to a decent 6600GT and added an Audigy 2 ZS

>> The C drive is set to RAID0 thru dedicated VIA IDE RAID controller with 2 IDE 80gb Seagate HDD (ATA100)
>> Another 80gb for storage as D drive.
--> Never used RAID; started with a single 120GB drive, added a 250GB later, as they got older and developed bad sectors, replaced them with a 500GB/750GB pair passed down from a newer desktop system.

H3nrik V! wrote on 2023-07-22, 06:54:

You may get disappointed from that upgrade, as the 3.2/1mb uses the Prescott core rather than the 3.0/512kb which uses Northwood core. Clock for clock, Northwood is a bit faster than Prescott.

I also used Northwood CPU (3.0C), for the same reason and others. It's not a clear win for either chip - in some applications/workflows, a Prescott will beat a Northwood clock-for-clock. However, Prescotts were known to run much hotter (or at least report hotter temperatures), which was causing insane amount of noise with stock cooling. Of course, one could invest in a quiet cooler, but I did not see the point.

https://cloakedthargoid.wordpress.com/ - Random content on hardware, software, games and toys