VOGONS

Common searches


Search results

Display options

Re: TurboC++3.0 and "Hands on C++" pack in book

in DOS
I disagree; using modern tooling to develop for older systems is far, far more productive. A modern cross compiler toolchain for Linux, Mac OS or Windows, coupled with a syntax/code highlighter, command completion with linting tools and build/link/test automation beats trying to run native dgjpp on …

Re: TurboC++3.0 and "Hands on C++" pack in book

in DOS
might still have the manuals. If not, there are scans online. Back in the day I didn't get very far at age 14 learning C++, but thought I'd have a go at retro coding. At least you tried, I was put off by the quote about shooting yourself in the foot :D I did learn it eventually though. I guess …

Re: Any suggestions on what more modern IDE & compiler+linker for 16-bit DOS apps development to replace Turbo C++ 3.01

I still may install Turbo Debugger 3.1. I'm curious how it looks as it's a separate product. I hope it will work fine in conjunction with Turbo C++ 3.01 IDE as both are released in 1992. Actually, I'm gonna switch to Borland C++ IDE, which includes the debugger. Just installing Borland C++ is …

Re: Any suggestions on what more modern IDE & compiler+linker for 16-bit DOS apps development to replace Turbo C++ 3.01

I don't have Turbo Debugger installed. You may laugh at me, but I do my "debugging" in TC++ IDE through some temporary "print" lines for variable values, pointers, etc. in console output - imagine even more ancient times, when no debugger softwares/add-ons were available :rofl: Actually I remove …

Re: Any suggestions on what more modern IDE & compiler+linker for 16-bit DOS apps development to replace Turbo C++ 3.01

I found three .TEM files (and UTIL.DOC text file) in TC++ 3 "DOC" folder, but I don't see any key bindings for "copy", "cut" or "paste" which can be redefined in them. It looks like I have version 3.00, perhaps they *removed* some files in 3.01? I have 5, although CMACROS.TEM is for extra key …

Re: Any suggestions on what more modern IDE & compiler+linker for 16-bit DOS apps development to replace Turbo C++ 3.01

For example in M$-DOS 7.1 (not sure about 6.22) EDIT the "standard" keyboard shortcuts like Ctrl+C, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V are usable, but in TC++ 3 the corresponding shortcut combinations are different: Ctrl+Ins, Shift+Del, Shift+Ins... and I still can't bring myself to use them. I guess I learned …

Re: Any suggestions on what more modern IDE & compiler+linker for 16-bit DOS apps development to replace Turbo C++ 3.01

Thank you very much for all the info and your suggestions, doshea ! They may be useful to others too. No worries, I hope this information helps someone to be much more successful at completing a project than I am :D What I miss most about this ancient Тurbo С++ 3 IDE is the quick shortcuts for …

Re: Any suggestions on what more modern IDE & compiler+linker for 16-bit DOS apps development to replace Turbo C++ 3.01

But the more complex the code for the projects become, the less productive it becomes to use this ancient DOS IDE. In DOS times I was into learning/experimenting with BASIC and Pascal, so in therms of usage this Borland Turbo C++ package is something new to me, that's why I have no idea what newer, …

Re: Windows for Workgroups TCP/IP Disk

Windows for Workgroups 3.10 was very rare, that being said. We have a localized copy at home from back of the day, but I've never seen one for sale on eBay. I suppose that might be because Windows for Workgroups 3.1 just added the networking features on top of Windows 3.1, so you only bought it if …

Page 1 of 25