Ok, I'll see what it does know. I'll also try to compile UB with adding those switches although you don't recommend it :lol: . I always tried to compile a UB but I had to do it on an Intel Mac and a PowerPC Mac because I don't know how to cross-compile. Then I lipo'ed them together.. Because you …

rhoenie, did you explained the SDL thing because you knew I got an error with SDL 1.2.13 & DOSBox 0.60 (even when I didn't say I had). Or has it nothing to do with that? I've previously compiled 0.72, 0.73 & CVS with SDL 1.2.13 but I don't know if I can use it in the older builds ?

Yes, I redownloaded them. Is there a specific SDL I should use in 0.60 & 0.50 or should the newest 1.2.13 do the trick?

Huh, It's fixed now somehow. I swear it didn't work :surprised: I even asked someone else to open the files and he also said it gave an error.... I don't know the error anymore because I already trashed to corrupted ones but it was like an infinite loop, first opening the .tar.gz, then there was a . …

I really think the source files are corrupt on sourceforge. Tried on 2 computers using Archiver Utility, Stuffit, TheUnarchiver and something unix in the terminal. Can someone verify this? (the CVS seems to open great though)

Dominus, I know how to make you a static SDL (if you haven't already) and how to have it like in the release (with an icon etc.). I don't know how to cross compile for PowerPC/Intel (I've made a message about it but nobody answered it). And I also don't know how to optimize it. If you want details, …

Ah okay, it might have been a G3 PowerPC one and that would use the G3 custom binary. I have an iMac G3 somewhere, I could test the G3 only binary and see if it has any difference.

Which iMac? (Intel or PowerPc?) anyway, I'll try to open the .tar.gz files today, if it doesn't work here I'll try on some other computer..

Ok, I'll try Quake or something like that. Still haven't got the source codes... This time, sourceforge has an error saying that the page is unavailable (not just the DOSBox downloads page but the whole site). Probably I downloaded corrupted .tar.gz files yesterday and that's why they won't open. I …

So what do you suggest to run in DOSBox so it isn't idle and still pretty consistent ? I'll try to compile 0.50 & 0.60 for my Mac (if they won't compile, I'll try other versions) First I'll have to see which version of SDL I need to use... EDIT: I can't seem to open the .tar.gz files. This has never …

I tested 0.65, that was the oldest already compiled version I could find. This version is PowerPC only, in theory, this would probably make it even faster for me because it doesn't have the unused Intel code. But in theory it also would have with my own builds on which it didn't. Anyway, DOSBox 0.65 …

When DOSBox 0.73 isn't doing anything at all, just being open, it uses around 50% of my CPU... (I'm the guy with the old PowerBook G4 from some replies above)... Still, it's using 50% of my 1.5 GHz processor... that's kinda much. Anyways, this happens with official/my own builds of 0.72 & 0.73.

This heating happens on my Mac with DOSBox 0.72, 0.73 and my own build without changes of 0.72 and 0.73. I always thought it was normal to use so much CPU ? It's an emulator so why wouldn't it ?

DOSBox heats up my PowerBook G4 1.5 GHz (running Mac OS X 10.5.7) as hell... with the standard settings. If you want I can change the .conf file to use other settings and post a report on that too here. I also think it uses lots of CPU...

Hi everyone, I'm running OS X 10.5 PowerPC, how do I cross-compile for 10.4 Intel? Some time ago I read something about this but I don't know how to use it. CFLAGS="\"-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk\"" LDFLAGS="\"-syslibroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk\"" The SDKs are there though. And …

So it's normal that core_prefetch takes like everything out of my Mac? I can barely move my mouse while compiling that :p. (1,5 GHz PowerBook G4, 512mb RAM)

Thanks 😀 -don't see the "logo" on Mac OS X... That's why I don't see the difference. Anyways, nice work on 0.73! Windows 3.11 requires much less (littler ? I'm not native English..) of my CPU. Keep it up with DOSBox 😀

Hello! In the source of 0.73 I changed 2 lines in a file named "dosbox_logo.h" From: #define LOGO_1 1 //#define LOGO_2 1 to //#define LOGO_1 1 #define LOGO_2 1 But the splash is the same, I know the numbers in the file are different for the two logos but I don't see the difference, can someone tell …