Re: D-Fend Reloaded (DOSBox frontend)

Posted on 2014-02-27, 14:09

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox General

in DOSBox General

Happy Prince wrote: As far as I can see, it doesn't use any sdl whatsoever. ykhwong's build doesn't use the SDL dynamic libraries but I'm pretty sure SDL is integrated into his dosbox executable as a static library.

---

Re: Mouse Movement Bugged (Dosbox Daum)

Posted on 2014-02-27, 14:06

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox General

in DOSBox General

Qbix wrote: Not really a solution for an official dosbox release though. Well, it looks like the problem has to do with SDL so perhaps the SDL devs will address the issue.

---

Re: D-Fend Reloaded (DOSBox frontend)

Posted on 2014-02-27, 03:55

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox General

in DOSBox General

This is a problem of the latest ykhwong's DOSBox build with Windows 8.1 or to be more precise: A problem with the version of Simple Direct Layer (SDL) used by the latest ykhwong's DOSBox build with Windows 8.1. In the last post in the thread you are linking to is mentioned that this problem exists …

---

Re: Mouse Movement Bugged (Dosbox Daum)

Posted on 2014-02-27, 00:05

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox General

in DOSBox General

Did some poking around and found this: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2908279/en-us I'm not sure if it'll fix DOSBox SVN Daum but I'll try it out when I get a chance. EDIT: Success! There is your workaround. Make sure Update rollup 2903939 is installed (which includes KB2908279) than manually add …

---

Re: Mouse Movement Bugged (Dosbox Daum)

Posted on 2014-02-24, 20:30

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox General

in DOSBox General

I had the same problem with truth5678's recent DOSBox SVN + Munt SVN build (initially launched by D-Fend Reloaded) and it appears Qbix is correct; using the SDL from DOSBox v0.74 fixes the problem. Further testing has shown the with truth5678's build the problem also occurs outside of D-Fend using a …

---

Re: DOSBox-SVN + MT-32(v1.30) emulation

Posted on 2014-02-19, 23:41

by

by SedrynTyros

in MT-32 General

in MT-32 General

Awesome!!!

---

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Posted on 2014-02-05, 17:21

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

(oddly, I get a second display adapter detected, but of course it doesn't work) but I assume that's a problem with the current ykhwong's build. FYI, I reported this problem to Taewong as well. The 2nd adapter will show up even if you install Win95 from scratch. It doesn't happen with the vanilla …

---

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Posted on 2014-01-27, 02:02

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

I verified that with this latest DOSBox-X build that the CD audio with Might and Magic VI plays correctly and is free of sound pops and crackles. Success! 😁

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-26, 05:51

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

TheGreatCodeholio graciously compiled a Win32 binary of DOSBox-x for anyone who might be interested in testing the most recent build. Hopefully anyone who felt that it was reprehensible for me and others to ask for it can commence getting over their butthurt. Cheers! 😀

---

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Posted on 2014-01-26, 05:44

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

New DOSBox-X release! I found some free time this weekend, including time to setup a Windows 7 + VS 2008 workstation and produce a Win32 binary. - CMOS memory size bugfixes (when mem size is less than 1MB) - Alternative DOS kernel, VGA BIOS, and UMB allocation support. When selected, the VGA BIOS …

---

Re: DOSBox-X branch

Posted on 2014-01-25, 15:27

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Patches

in DOSBox Patches

New DOSBox SVN Daum build released this morning that includes the most updated DOSBox-X!! http://ykhwong.x-y.net/ EDIT: Unfortunately, all of my Windows 95b images crash the emulator during the guest OS boot, so perhaps more work needs to be done on this Daum build. Oh well.

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-19, 18:56

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

You know Sedryn, if you really don't think that the Dosbox-x project is useless, contrary to what you wrote, why don't you show your appreciation by setting up a build environment and supplying the much needed Windows binaries? That would help everybody I have considered that. Thing is, emcur.com …

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-19, 18:48

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Dominus wrote: Which rules? Did the op of this thread pr a moderator ask to keep it clean? Is that how it works? My mistake then.

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-19, 18:28

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Dominus wrote: Nah, it's the right one. The one you can't help but reply to. Man of your word... But what about the rules? Staying on topic and all that? I really do think we're going to need a separate thread for each of these points if we want to explore them further.

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-19, 16:48

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Dominus wrote: You know Sedryn, if you really don't think that the Dosbox-x project is useless, contrary to what you wrote, why don't you show your appreciation by setting up a build environment and supplying the much needed Windows binaries? That would help everybody Now that's definitely in the …

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-18, 02:28

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

I understand it is frustrating for you not to have a native Windows build, but he's the one who chooses how to best spend his free time. Ya know, you make an excellent point, but I'm afraid it's not entirely relevant to the Pros and Cons topic. When Dominus has it moved to a new thread, we could …

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-16, 17:25

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

@the GreatCodeholio, seems your whole coding is useless anyway, at least according to Sedryn ;) Your words, not mine. There's more of that "people seeing what they want to see" stuff you presciently referred to earlier. It won't be a Windows world for long, if Microsoft continues along the Windows …

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-15, 23:29

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

You really seem to believe that the development of Dosbox-x makes no sense without a supplied Windows build. Yes I do, because it doesn't. I understand that you disagree. If the DOSBox-X dev doesn't want to bother with maintaining a Win32 build, I get that too. I decided to point out in a not-so- …

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-15, 22:29

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

Bla bla, you can sure read into that what you want but it's clear you are just being pathetic now. This whole thread belongs into the trash IMO mostly because of posts like your last two. But since I'm part of it, it would really seem like the thing you are accusing me of. So moving this discussion …

---

Re: Pros and Cons of mainting a Windows built if you are a developer on Linux (was:DOSBox-X branch)

Posted on 2014-01-15, 21:54

by

by SedrynTyros

in DOSBox Development

in DOSBox Development

You got that wrong, our discussion added nothing whatsoever to the actual topic of the DOSBox-x branch, thus I moved it away from it but I did not stop the discussion, nor did I move your request for a Windows build. You seem bent to claim this as censoring but it's not, it's moving a discussion …

---