>Regarding MS-DOS 7.x, actually Microsoft officially refers to it as >MS-DOS 7.0/7.1 in several released files of Windows 98, and ... I don't argue that MSDOS 7.x IS DOS --- but someone at MSOFT decided that it should show "Windows" as it's version.. That tells me that at some meetine it was decided …

>this thread is not intended for such detailed comparisons between DOSBox forks agreed, but I'm of mixed opinion... I have't seen much else going on in this thread and since I'm responding to comments made due to my positing in it, I'm not sure creating a whole new thread would improve... but would …

I have updated my DBUTIL archive, replacing GMNT.COM (Get MoNT path) with GDBCM (Get DosBox Config/Mount information into env variable). This addresses the points I made in a previous post, and lets you get at various bits of information available in the output of the "config" and "mount" commands. …

Re-reading your post, I think you migh be looking for something a bit more complex tahn finding the DosBox home directory: The dosbox command: config -l on my system outputs: ';;' lines are comments that I have added ;;------------------------------------- ;; I tend to just copy DosBox into a …

Just added GMNT.COM to my DBUTIL archive. Gets the host MouNT point for a DosBox drive into a DosBox environment variable. Little bit tricker than I anticipated, DosBox apparently destroys environment variables created by a program when that program terminates - GMNT.COM makes a temporary batch file …

What I tend to do in my DOSBOX setups is in the config file, I MOUNT the DOSBOX home directory as drive Y. I always use full paths when I mount because I can then retirect the output of MOUNT within DOSBOX to get the actual host paths for the mounted drives. If you would like, I can easily write a …

>Good to see the new site. Appreciate the update - lots of these tiny utils >will be very useful, not only in DOSBox (or DOS-on-Win64) but for my >memory-limited XT as well. Just curious what you mean by "DOS-on-Win64" -- as far as I know Win64 doesn't support 16 bit code at all (and most DOS stuff …

>May I humbly suggest looking into whether some of your contributions >might be applicable at the FreeDOS project? Using DOSBox for file >management tends to be discouraged and I fear these tools may not get >the attention they deserve here. I think some of my earlier stuff did make it into FreeDOS. …

>Greetings. Did you write those utilities from scratch yourself? Yes, I write most of my stuff from "scratch", or at least starting with a similar program I'd written before. For DOS stuff I tend to use my own C compiler which has libraries and an efficiency level which are quite a bit bettern that …

Hi, Been a DosBox user for years, but this is the first time I have posted to these forum. Just wanted to let everyone know that I have posted many of the tools and utilities I wrote over the years to enhance the DosBox experience (at least for me) to my site - see the "downloads" area. Dave …