I ran Speedsys on my Biostar MB-8433UUD v3.0 as well. It performed much better than the PCchips M919. All memory results now outperform the AMD at 200 Mhz with a stock Cyrix 5x86 - 120 Mhz and a Matrox G200. Here is a summary of all tests I have run: Speedsys: Benchmark number: 65.49 L1: 172.98 MB/s …

I am curious, what is the least old and fastest PCI graphics card you guys have been able to get working in a socket 3 486? Is the core speed allowed to exceed the processor speed? The most modern PCI graphics card I can get working in my PCI-based 486's is a Matrox Millinnium G200 w/16MB SDRAM. I …

My 3Dbench results aren't spectacular because I am using a 1:2/3 Host-to-PCI clock divider in the BIOS for enhanced system stability in WinNT4. When it is set at 1:1, I get a 3Dbench score of 91. Also, a Matrox G200 graphics card isn't the best 3D performer; it is know for its 2D capabilities (all I …

Tetrium, what was your prognosis of the Cyrix 5x86 - 133? Does it have a 4x multiplier in it? Does it run stably at 33/133? I have two systems which run exceptionally well with the Cyrix 5x86 - 120 in WinNT4 and Win98SE (all enhancements turn on, except for branch prediction). I would be interested …

I have attached some screen shots of SpeedSys and Cachechk. [NOTE: filenames of the first and second cachechk image are slipped. I can't seem to correct it -- perhaps some bug with this forum's software.] The measured cpu clock speed from Cachechk 4 does not agree well with that of Cachechk 7. …

I think a stock Cyrix 5x86 - 120 Mhz will likely outperform this AMD at 200 Mhz. I've been running mine for years in a Biostar MB-8433UUD and a PC Chips M919. They run stable on the fastest RAM and cache settings. I've been able to turn on all enhanced features of the Cyrix 5x86 in Windows NT4.0 and …