Robx66 wrote on 2023-04-05, 06:42:
Jo22 wrote on 2023-04-05, 05:41:The main memory is more in need, maybe.
If the 286 mainboard uses Shadow memory, a humble Megabyte won't be sufficient for Exte […]
Show full quote
The main memory is more in need, maybe.
If the 286 mainboard uses Shadow memory, a humble Megabyte won't be sufficient for Extended Memory anymore.
It's then either Shadow Memory or Extended Memory.
That's one of the reasons why I have an aversion against 1 MB setups.
That being said, it's your PC, of course. You have the last say how to configure it, and that's fine. Each to his own. 🙂👍
I wish I could add more RAM but that's maximum this motherboard can take without desoldering dram and sockets and then solder new sockets for 511000 dram unfortunately.
No no, I don't blame you. It wasn't meant as a complaint at all. 😅
I know those big old motherboards with their DIP/DIL RAM chips.. They have a nice "chipset" and an elegant layout, but no SIMM/SIPP sockets yet.
I just said that because I sometimes end up in an argument about period-correct RAM configurations.
That's because my ideas of an 286 often clash together with that of others.
The majority sees an 286 just as a fast XT, it seems. An oldie for playing Tetris or KingsQuest in Hercules/EGA.
By contrast, I grew up with a second-hand 286 PC in the 90s, that my father and me assembled/refurbished.
Long story short, we treated the 286 the same as a 386/486 at the time. Which it essentially was, except for the vintage CPU.. The motherboard was modern, had SVGA on-board (ATI VGA Wonder), along with a bus mouse port.
That means, we installed an 80 MB IDE HDD, 4x 1 MB SIMMs, a PAS16 soundcard+SCSI CD-ROM drive (both part of a multimedia upgrade kit; common at the time)..
Later, the PC got a Mustek handy scanner - a tiny ISA card served as an interface card.
Below the desktop was an HP Laserjet +.
By 90s definition, that 286 was a real multimedia PC, capable of running Windows 3.1x smoothly.
In fact, it did just about comply to the first version of the MPC Level 1 specification (286-12 CPU, the revised version had 386SX-16).
I've even did a bit of software development on that 286 PC (QB45, Visual Basic 1, etc). 😃
In short, that 286 was pretty much on 486 level, except for the aging 16-Bit CPU.
At some point, I've also used it to dial into CompuServe and T-Online (aka BTX/Datex-J).
Modem was a beige Creatix model, ca. between 14400 Bit/s to 33600 Bit's.
The client software ran on Windows 3.1 in Standard Mode and used pure 16-Bit instructions, making it 286 compatible.
Edit: That being said, I don't mean to say it's wrong to build an old school 286. Hercules and EGA are cool, too.
The 286 era spawned 10 years, from 1984 to ~1994, with me considering 1992 to be its heyday, before its popularity started to quickly decline in 1993.
PS: You can install memory boards in ISA slot, too. That was the original method, before the advent of the chipset.
Look for BocaRAM cards, AST Rampage, etc. Some of those are EMS boards than also can be used for Extended Memory (memory above 1MB) or XMS (has himem.sys compatible driver).
ISA XMS/EMS Memory Extension / Expansion cards: Now Running without Driver / Documentation :-)
Bocaram AT XMS/EMS memory card replica?
https://www.minuszerodegrees.net/5170/cards/5170_cards.htm
ISA or AT-Bus used to be based on the processor bus of the 80286 CPU. It's the 286's front side bus, so to say.
80286 PCs can directly, natively drive the ISA bus. They're both directly coupled, so to say. Maybe with some buffer stages I between, too. Unless a chipset decouples them both.
Depending on waitstates, clock speed, duty cycles/recovery times etc. ISA can be quite quick.
In early designs, memory was attached via ISA bus. Same goes for IBM PC/XTs and PC/XT bus.
Edit: My bad, I just realized that I was too chatty again. 😅 Sorry about that, hope you don't mind. 😔
"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel
//My video channel//