VOGONS


First post, by nemail

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Hey!

Currently I'm working on my Socket A Build (finally!). The parts were laying around for months!

- Chieftec Dragon Midi Tower with Front USB
- (for now) some not-too-cheap 300W PSU (will be replaced by an Enermax 465W)
- ASUS A7N8X-E Deluxe
- AMD Athlon XP 3200+
- 3x 1GB DDR400 CL2 memory
- PowerColor X1950 Pro 512MB AGP card
- 120GB Seagate Barracuda IDE drive (maybe I'll install a second or third one at some point)
- some DVD-ROM drive

16916 3D marks with 3DMark2001 SE, without any optimizations so far

Attachments

  • IMG_0674.JPG
    Filename
    IMG_0674.JPG
    File size
    798.76 KiB
    Views
    1101 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 1 of 9, by petro89

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Looks like a great build to me! That board was considered one of the best for the socket a platform. I think a 1950is the perfect pairing for a 3200+ as well. What are your plans for it?

*Ryzen 9 3900xt, 5700xt, Win10
*Ryzen 7 2700x, Gtx1080, Win10
*FX 9590, Vega64, Win10
*Phenom IIx6 1100T, R9 380, Win7
*QX9770, r9 270x, Win7
*FX60, hd5850, Win7
*XP2400+, ti4600, Win2k
*PPro 200 1mb, banshee, w98
*AMD 5x86, CL , DOS

Reply 2 of 9, by nemail

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
petro89 wrote:

Looks like a great build to me! That board was considered one of the best for the socket a platform. I think a 1950is the perfect pairing for a 3200+ as well. What are your plans for it?

Thank you 😀
honestly i thought the X1950 Pro would be way too fast for the 3200+ but if you say it is perfect, I'm even happier 😀

I have installed Windows XP SP3 on it and will be using it for those games which don't run on a modern 64 bit Windows (7, 8, 8.1 or even 10) but still need decent computing power.

Reply 3 of 9, by petro89

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Yes it is a bit overpowered but gives you newer technology than a lot of the cards that are a bit older that are a better match speed wise. I remember an article from those days that showed most games still getting a boost from the top of the line agp cards including the 1950, but even up to a 3850 or 4670, when run on a3200+. I'll try to find it.

*Ryzen 9 3900xt, 5700xt, Win10
*Ryzen 7 2700x, Gtx1080, Win10
*FX 9590, Vega64, Win10
*Phenom IIx6 1100T, R9 380, Win7
*QX9770, r9 270x, Win7
*FX60, hd5850, Win7
*XP2400+, ti4600, Win2k
*PPro 200 1mb, banshee, w98
*AMD 5x86, CL , DOS

Reply 4 of 9, by nemail

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
petro89 wrote:

Yes it is a bit overpowered but gives you newer technology than a lot of the cards that are a bit older that are a better match speed wise. I remember an article from those days that showed most games still getting a boost from the top of the line agp cards including the 1950, but even up to a 3850 or 4670, when run on a3200+. I'll try to find it.

cool 😀

Reply 5 of 9, by blank001

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I'm pretty sure that roughly moving to say a A64 venice 754 would get you only roughly 5K more in 3d2001.

_: K6-III+ 450apz@550, P5A-B, 128Mb CL2, Voodoo 5500 AGP, MX300, AWE64 Gold 32mb, SC-55v2.0
_: Pentium III 1400 S, TUSL2-C, 512Mb CL2, Voodoo 5500 AGP, MX300

Reply 6 of 9, by petro89

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Here is the article I mentioned. Good read in my opinion. In this case they pair a 1950 with an xp2500+ and show that in a lot of cases there is a good boost when compared to older cards that most people usually pair with a socket a system. With your CPU being a 3200+ I think it just makes the case for pairing it with a 1950 even stronger. my Athlon XP system (running at 2.3 ghz) is paired with a 1650pro which I also think is a good match but I do feel that a 1950 would even get me a little better performance. I actually have an hd3850 AGP sitting in an Athlon mp build as well. I've wanted to swap the cards but haven't gotten around to it yet. 😊

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/agp-platf … lysis,1509.html

*Ryzen 9 3900xt, 5700xt, Win10
*Ryzen 7 2700x, Gtx1080, Win10
*FX 9590, Vega64, Win10
*Phenom IIx6 1100T, R9 380, Win7
*QX9770, r9 270x, Win7
*FX60, hd5850, Win7
*XP2400+, ti4600, Win2k
*PPro 200 1mb, banshee, w98
*AMD 5x86, CL , DOS

Reply 7 of 9, by ahendricks18

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Coolio! I have a socket a machine. I have to get a new windows xp install CD because I misplaced mine and the current install says that the Biostar mobo is not fully ACPI compliant. 😢

Main: AMD FX 6300 six core 3.5ghz (OC 4ghz)
16gb DDR3, Nvidia Geforce GT740 4gb Gfx card, running Win7 Ultimate x64
Linux: AMD Athlon 64 4000+, 1.5GB DDR, Nvidia Quadro FX1700 running Debian Jessie 8.4.0

Reply 8 of 9, by kanecvr

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
petro89 wrote:

I think a 1950is the perfect pairing for a 3200+ as well. What are your plans for it?

No it's not. The 3200+ bottlenecks the x1950. I've tested my x1950xt agp and there's allmost 8000 pts diference in 3dmark01 between a c2d e8400 and my 3200+. You might experience choppiness in some games that would otherwise not show up on more apropriate cards like the 9800xt.

Nice rig tough! Love the case.