VOGONS


Another 486 build.... with EISA!

Topic actions

First post, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I figured I'd post this here since this is where the 486 gurus all hang out.

About a month ago I got an itch to do a 486 build, but with a bus I never really encountered in my years of doing computer repair. I never had an EISA system, so some horse trading on ebay and digging the bins at the computer shop I used to work at (and my basement) yielded the following thus far:

-Micronics EISA2-VL Full-AT motherboard with 40MB RAM, 256k L2 cache, and a 486DX2/66
-Jaton VL41 S3 805 VLB Video with 2MB VRAM (my #9 GXE64 somehow fried itself tonight! 😠 )
-SIIG ISA "EIDE" I/O card with enhanced BIOS. The MB has onboard I/O, but only 16545 UART and PS/2 mode parallel.
-Random 600MB Seagate HD and some 32X Mitsumi CD-ROM
-Adaptec AHA-2740W EISA SCSI
-3Com 3c597TX 10/100 EISA ethernet. Picked this one up for $6 on amazon, NOS! Much faster then the 3c509B ISA card I had in there.
-Soundblaster AWE32 CT2760 (NOT Rev 3! Still requires Diagnose to "soft config" it though)
-All housed in a period correct full AT case I had to take completely apart to squeeze the MB in!

On the way:
-Intel 486 DX4/100 Overdrive 5v
-Promise EIDE2300plus

I was going to use my Promise EIDEMax II paired with a Boca VL2 I/O card, but the I/O card and the motherboard didn't get along at all. that same card gave me problems on my Soyo SY-25N Socket 3 board, so its likely bad. The ISA card isn't horrible, it does support PIO4/MWDMA2. The motherboard is far from ideal in terms of stupid stuff, but I'll live with it.

Pros:
-Micronics makes quality stuff
-Has full EISA implementation with Intel chips and 2 busmastering VLBus slots. None of that HiNT crap!
-Takes 72pin SIMMs
-Supports AMD 5x86 and POD83Mhz (with limitations below)
-EISA CFG and tools easy to find

Cons:
-Has cruddy Phoenix BIOS
-Memory is configured with DIP switches, 64MB max.
-BIOS shadowing can't be enabled with more then 16MB of RAM. Memory count on boot is SLOW with it off. I have to use EMM386 to do shadowing in DOS.
-L1 and L2 cache is write through only. Major bummer
-5v Socket 2, need voltage adapter or overdrive/upgrade chips. (Soyo board even though its Socket 3, is a cheap model with the 3.3v VRM missing)
-No on board APM like my Soyo has. Did any EISA boards actually support that? I know the AIR 486EI was made into 1994.
-Only makes available 637k of conventional memory in DOS. Don't know if this is an EISA thing.

Despite the above, its proving to be a speedy little box. I wish my 864 card didn't die on me. I don't think the 805 is as fast, but it works in just about every OS I have used, including NT 3.1. I could always pull out the infamous Diamond Viper VLB (MIB) if I want a headache though. The most annoying thing is that my Transcend x133 8GB CF card refuses to run in any DMA mode with the SIIG card. Its stuck on PIO4, while that crappy Seagate runs on Multiword DMA2! I'll likely pick up a nice 9.1GB SCSI HD and avoid the whole mess.

Oh, and pictures will be coming soon.

Last edited by NJRoadfan on 2012-05-26, 06:39. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 4 of 97, by Old Thrashbarg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Nice system. I've been kinda wanting to play with an EISA system, but could never really justify it. The boards are hard to find (or rather,good ones are hard to find.. there seem to be plenty of those POS HiNT boards around), plus I'd have to track down EISA cards too, which makes for a rather significant investment.

TBH, though, what caught my eye the most is the hard drive setup... an ISA card that supports PIO4/DMA2? How the hell does that work? I've seen a couple that purport to do PIO2, but even with an overclocked ISA bus, 8-10MB/sec is sorta pushing the practical limits of throughput.

You mentioned maybe getting a SCSI drive, and yeah, that's the way I'd go. I'd personally get a SCSI CD-ROM drive too and lose the IDE altogether. However, I'm not sure if the 2740W supports >8GB drives... not that it would really be a huge loss, even one of the common-as-dirt 4.5GB drives would be more than enough for a 486, but it's something you may want to check on before you go buying hard drives.

Reply 5 of 97, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The AHA-2740 series BIOS supports drives right up to the 8.4GB INT13H limit. Sadly it doesn't support CD-ROM booting, and I can't seem to get SBM to see my IDE CD. As for the I/O card, its a SIIG SC-JEE012 with a giant "Enhanced IDE" logo on it. Period documentation states it does DMA transfers up to 8.3MB/sec

http://web.archive.org/web/19980214041955/htt … de/eideenha.htm

The operating mode is what HDAT2 reports for the drives under plain DOS. I don't know if its accurate or not.

I hear you about the lack of good EISA boards. It seems wiredforservice on ebay has the market cornered and won't part with them. There is an older EISA only Mylex MAE486 board up, but someone pulled the BIOS, keyboard controller, and the two RTC modules off of it! I found a copy of the BIOS online, but getting that board up and running would be costly if one can't find the Dallas chips for it.

Reply 6 of 97, by Old Thrashbarg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Ah, OK... from what I can gather from the documentation you linked, it looks like the VLB version is capable of PIO4/DMA2 (16.7MB/sec), but the ISA version is a bit more limited... it doesn't state clearly what modes it supports, but 8.3MB/sec is the spec for PIO2 and single-word DMA2. Still, though, that's not bad at all for an ISA card... most don't even have the option for higher speeds, it's just the original PIO0. And it wasn't until the later '90s that IDE drives came out that could push more than 7-8MB/sec sustained anyhow, so 8.3MB/sec is certainly adequate bandwidth for that sort of machine.

About the SCSI CD-ROM, I hunted down the manual for the 2740-series (here, if you haven't already found it), and according to that, there should be an option to enable CD-ROM booting through the ECU, under the BIOS configuration section.

Reply 7 of 97, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I ran across that revision of the manual (dated 1996). It seems to be from a later version of the card, but all of Adaptec's EISA config and overlay files simply don't show the option. I was hoping for a ROM upgrade, but the ROM Adaptec has posted for the cards is older then the one my board came with! (2.10 is posted, I have 2.11)

Reply 8 of 97, by Old Thrashbarg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Hm... strange. Maybe somebody more familiar with those cards can offer some insights... I think there are a couple people on here who have them.

Of course I suppose the other question is... when would you actually need to boot from a CD on a 486? Everything CD-based I can think of that would be 486-friendly either isn't bootable to begin with, or can be started from a boot floppy.

Reply 9 of 97, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Got the 100Mhz DX4 overdrive today, so here are some SPEEDSYS numbers for this board.

This program seems to ID the HD running at PIO3/DMA1, reasonable given that its an ISA interface. Testing the CF card lead to some amusing results. It pegged the HD speed bar on the bottom, but actual linear read speed isn't much faster then the HD I got.

Attachments

  • 486DX4EISA.png
    Filename
    486DX4EISA.png
    File size
    15.95 KiB
    Views
    7560 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 10 of 97, by GL1zdA

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Great looking motherboard. It seems it uses some custom Micronics chipset. What are the Intel chips near the CPU socket?

getquake.gif | InfoWorld/PC Magazine Indices

Reply 12 of 97, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

How much did this beauty set you back? I've always had an interest in EISA systems but could never justify the effort and cost. Any serious effort to source an EISA system fizzled when I found a stable super fast PCI socket 3 board.

Is that a RTC module in the first image? Is it compatible with the Dallas 12887 units? If not, are they difficult to find new? What is the production date on your RTC? I've never seen an RTC battery last more than 18 years. You can get new production date code Dallas 12887 RTC's on digikey for a pretty penny ($10+).

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 13 of 97, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The RTC chip is a Benchmarq bq3287mt, which is pin compatible with the Dallas chip and still holds a charge! Replacements are still made by TI. RTC batteries can last a long time in some cases. My circa 1987 Apple IIgs still holds a charge with its "5 year" lithium battery.

The board was $50 after using ebay's "best offer". You have to find a seller who is willing to negotiate prices though. wiredforservice doesn't from what I can see, even though some of the equipment is clearly damaged and noted as such in the auction listing.

EISA boards are certainly odd for the most part. Many of them are seemingly 1991 designs even though they had VLB slots and Overdrive sockets tacked on. So we get stupid limitations like no write back L2 cache, and 16MB limits for BIOS shadowing (which is ridiculous on a 32bit machine!). The most modern boards seem to be based on the Opti chipset. The AIR 486EI seems to be the best board, sporting a full 5v/3.3v Socket 3 design. Don't know if it does write back L1 cache though.

Reply 14 of 97, by feipoa

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Forum user 'Anonymous Coward' is the guy to ask about EISA 486s. He seems to have one of the better configured EISA 486s still out there and has tested many EISA cards. He has 1 MB cache on his board and 128 MB RAM, etc. You can check it out here,
My Ultimate VL/EISA 486

What is the longest you've seen a Dallas 12887 RTC last? The longest I've seen a 12887 last is in a HOT-433 board I have. It has a 1994 date code and may still work, but in the past few months, the time keeping has slipped quite a bit. It was off by several months at last power up and is probably entirely non-functional now.

I think most of us don't even look at the wiredfor* listings anymore. One glance at those crummy cell phone quality photos and I move onto another listing. From what I've heard, a lot of what he sells is defective or mis-labeled.

Last edited by feipoa on 2012-08-01, 15:15. Edited 1 time in total.

Plan your life wisely, you'll be dead before you know it.

Reply 15 of 97, by Old Thrashbarg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

There are some other EISA boards, like the Everex 'Step 486 EISA' series, Gigabyte GA-486SA/486TA and the AMI Enterprise III, that use the SiS EISA chipset and are a fair bit more modern. Finding one is a bit of a challenge, but they are out there... a few members here have them, and yes, Anonymous Coward is the one to talk to about those boards.

But the reason a lot of the EISA boards seem to be 1991/1992 designs, is because they are 1991/1992 designs. VLB came around in '92, as did the overdrive sockets (even though nothing actually made use of 'em until quite a bit later). The limitations you're talking about are pretty standard for early VLB boards, so it's really no surprise that they also exist on consumer-level EISA boards. Remember, the Micronics board you have wasn't really a business-class board, it was primarily used in Gateway's upper-end home system... something akin to the Dell XPS series of today.

And don't bother getting worked up about the lack of write-back L2 cache. That's majority of all 486 boards... they didn't even start making 486-class processors that supported it until mid-late '94, which was getting to be near the end of the 486 era, and it never became a common thing on VLB or EISA boards because VLB and EISA were on their way out in favor of PCI. Write-back L1 is worth having, but you're not really missing much performance with write-through L2 on a 486 machine anyhow.

About wiredforservice/newsgroups... that clown is one of the primary reasons I wish eBay would implement a seller blacklist, so I wouldn't have to go through the extra steps to filter out all his crap listings every time I make a search. Him and that guy that uses the same track runner picture on all his listings.

Reply 16 of 97, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yes, this board was used in the Gateway 2000 4DX2/66E in that giant tower case they used. Regarding L2 cache, I coulda swore my 486 purchased back in 1993 had write back L2 cache.

As for clock chips, those Dallas modules were failing in the late 90s, on machines that were only 5 years old. I hated fixing those things, usually we just replaced them. We weren't afraid of soldering.

Also, are the memory benchmark numbers in-line for a WT L1 cache DX4 100Mhz? Its been awhile since I had a 486, although I could compare numbers with my newer SiS based Soyo SY-25N board.

Reply 17 of 97, by Old Thrashbarg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Yeah, your numbers look decent... they're actually not too bad even compared to some of the cheaper boards that do support WB cache.

As far as having a 1993 board with WB L2, it's certainly possible there were boards that technically supported it, but there wouldn't have been any processor at the time that could've used it. The standards were a mess during that period... board manufacturers were scrambling to support all sorts of features that were "just around the corner," that ultimately ended up being delayed or cancelled entirely. The POD is probably the best example of that, it was originally expected to come out in '93, and everybody started adding the sockets and BIOS functions to support it, but the chip didn't actually get released until '95 and by that point the specs had been changed enough that it didn't work in some of the early 'Overdrive capable' boards.

About the Dallas chips... on some boards it may be possible to solve the problem once and for all by converting 'em to use a DS1285/12885 and an external battery. Your board looks like it could be a candidate for that, I see unpopulated spots for a battery and 32.768khz clock crystal. You'd have to work out the values on the other associated components, but I'd imagine it's based mostly off some sort of reference design so it'd probably be doable just by looking at datasheets. I've thought about doing something similar on a Biostar board I have, but I haven't had the time to really investigate it much.

Reply 18 of 97, by NJRoadfan

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

The board I had in 1993 was a "Typhoon 486" based on what the manual said. TH99 says a "Target Micro" made it, but the board layout doesn't look like I remember. The board was from late 92-early 93 if I recall, the AMIBIOS was dated 06/06/92 and it lacked a ZIF socket. I do have an old VHS video of it booting, but the BIOS string is hard to read and what I can decipher of it, the vender number doesn't appear on any of AMI's lists.

Anyway, I remember many vendors advertising WB L2 cache based 486 systems in Computer Shopper at the time. They all touted the Overdrive Ready bit too.

Reply 19 of 97, by Old Thrashbarg

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Just a guess, but I suspect the two things probably went hand-in-hand, since AFAIK the Overdrive was always specced to support WB cache since its original inception.

OTOH, that was also the era when a bunch of the fly-by-night Taiwanese manufacturers would blatantly lie about specs, and "Typhoon 486" sounds suspiciously like one of the generic boards that would typically be guilty of such a thing. So that's a possibility too.