VOGONS


Kixs's 286 to the Max

Topic actions

First post, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Here we go 😁

Ever since I got the PC retro bug I wanted to get a decent 286 board. Search was long and hard but after many years I think I found it. The motherboard itself is unknown to me. I used to have Octek Fox II Rev. 3.2 with Siemens 286-16 back then and it was fast. So I wanted it or something equivalent.

The motherboard:
5JZqNKel.jpg

Some details:
DeRdpxgh.jpg

In it's original form it had Siemens 286-16 and 32MHz crystal. It also had AMD 287-10 math coprocessor. I upgraded it to it's current maximum configuration.

- Harris 286-20 overclocked to 24MHz (crystal is 48MHz)
- Intel 80287XL
- 4x 1MB 60ns 30-pin SIMM

With 50MHz crystal it freezes in DOS. I'll try to get a real Harris 25MHz one day 😉

The tests where done with Cirrus Logic 5429 2MB and some generic I/O controller.

On to the screenshots:

SzEvgYQh.jpg

and to the benchmarks. Let them tell the story... 😁

Norton System Information:
KbzOo5Jh.jpg

Checkit 3:
5lwpWPUh.jpg

NSSI:
mOaodRMh.jpg

Comptest 2.60:
3eMZkDeh.jpg

PMIPS & Speed600:
gE9Rmxdh.jpg

3DBench 1.0 & F1GP Adelaide (default settings with PC speaker):
nwB1LoUh.jpg

These are all best case results. BIOS doesn't have any settings. The numerous jumpers don't do much. At least I can't see the difference.

Things to come... maybe put everything in a nice case. Try some more benchmarks, even Windows 3.10 ones. It would help if there exist a Windows acceleration graphic card that supports 286 😕 I'll also try AutoCAD 10 with different math coprocessors (AMD, Intel, IIT, Cyrix). Only missing Cyrix 287XL+, but should be on the way (so says someone in China).

Does any other game have processor usage display that runs on a 286? Any other benchmarks I should try?

/me happy 😁

Last edited by kixs on 2023-07-19, 16:36. Edited 1 time in total.

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 1 of 52, by manbearpig

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Very nice. Looks like you can even throw some more memory on there.

Premio 212B motherboard (MSI MS-6112)
Intel PentiumII 333MHz Slot 1 66MHz bus
384MB ECC 66MHz
SIIG ATA133 controller --> Seagate Barracuda 80GB
SIIG Gigabit Ethernet (RTL8169) / USB 2.0 / IEEE1394 controller
ESS 1869 soundcard on board wavetable synth

Reply 2 of 52, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I removed dip chips as it doesn't recognize full memory when both types are installed. I think it should support 4MB simms (total of 16MB) but I don't see any reason to upgrade to more then 4MB. Back in the days I had 1MB and later upgraded to 2MB for Windows 3.10. Windows 3.1 run quite bad with 1MB, 42MB HDD that was "upgraded" with doublespace to ~65MB. Running Word 2.0 you could actually see how the interface was drawing. I might even try this again with this one 😉

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 3 of 52, by Jolaes76

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Once upon a time I was also into cooking up the best 286

Finally scored a 25 mhz Harris 286

you can find some of my bench results on the 4th page.

Yours are definitely better, I conclude that your Advanced Computer Technology chipset (rebranded Texas Instruments TI TACT8230, I think) is much faster in ALU.

The Achilles heel of 286 chipsets, however, is EMS support. I have already fried a Tecmar EMS board on the 25 mhz Citygate board, will not try again, these old relics are all unstable above cca 14 mhz bus speed. Without EMS you cannot run a hefty lot of games optimally and many apps of the day could make good use of EMS as well.

I do not think your motherboard has EMS drivers either 🙁

http://ibm-pc.org/drivers/memory/memory.htm

"Ita in vita ut in lusu alae pessima iactura arte corrigenda est."

Reply 4 of 52, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

To be honest... I never used EMS memory anyways, even back in 1991. For me DOS games begun in 1991/92 with PC 286 😉 Before that Atari/Amiga 😁

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 5 of 52, by Jolaes76

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I see.. the Amiga was more advanced indeed up to '92. Excluding music, of course. The MT32 and later GM modules mopped up the floor with poor Paula 😀
Yet, the Amiga had a luxury - snob item status around here back then...
My "8bit o' choice" was the Enterprise 128 😀

"Ita in vita ut in lusu alae pessima iactura arte corrigenda est."

Reply 6 of 52, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Many 286 motherboards can do EMS without an EMS board. Both my Neat chipset board and my PC Chips M209 can do this, you just specify in the BIOS how much EMS and XMS you want using available memory. 😀

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 7 of 52, by badmojo

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Skyscraper wrote:

Many 286 motherboards can do EMS without an EMS board. Both my Neat chipset board and my PC Chips M209 can do this, you just specify in the BIOS how much EMS and XMS you want using available memory. 😀

Yes mine does the same - it's a relatively new 286 board though I think.

Life? Don't talk to me about life.

Reply 8 of 52, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Nice setup kixs. There is a reason for 16megs-"just because you can" 😉 Windows 3.1 will love you for it.

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 9 of 52, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

It's not a problem to try it out. I have many 4MB sticks. They are all rated at 70ns but I think it shouldn't matter much.

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 10 of 52, by Scali

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Jolaes76 wrote:

I see.. the Amiga was more advanced indeed up to '92. Excluding music, of course. The MT32 and later GM modules mopped up the floor with poor Paula 😀

Oh, I think that's a matter of perspective.
Especially in the demoscene, people loved the mod format, and most platforms were basically just emulating the 4ch Paula hardware in software in order to play these tracker modules. As PCs became more powerful, they expanded the mod format to 16-bit and more channels.
Being sample-based gave a lot more flexibility for music and sound effects than MT32 and other midi devices of the day.
The Pinball Fantasies soundtrack is a fine example of what a great tracker musician can do with just 4 channels: https://youtu.be/qLAScOKONaw
The PC version just played the Amiga music.
I much prefer this sort of music to the generic-sounding MT32 stuff.

http://scalibq.wordpress.com/just-keeping-it- … ro-programming/

Reply 11 of 52, by 386_junkie

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

This is a sweet board... always nice to see someone pick up a no so well known part / board and have it perform the pants off some OEM's or better known sought after parts.

Here's one for the underdog!

Thanks for sharing Kixs

Compaq Systempro; EISA Dual 386 ¦ Compaq Junkiepro; EISA Dual 386 ¦ ALR Powerpro; EISA Dual 386

EISA Graphic Cards ¦ EISA Graphic Card Benchmarks

Reply 13 of 52, by Ekb

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

286, unknown brand. Five chipsets VLSI.
6cb37442f8adt.jpg 895ff4a842f5t.jpg

My MotherBoard:
546df2cc22b2t.jpg 824368476c47t.jpg

Clocker in 100mhz (100/4=25mhz)
CPU = Harris 25mhz.
FPU = Intel 287XL
RAM = only DIP20 Siemens 60ns(super faster) + Aluminium cooler
VGA = CirrusLogic 5420, 512kb, Jump JP1=Closed (for low wait state)
Sound = ESS1868
Multi I/O = Chips "TANS" (china?) for super faster.
HDD = CompactFlash 1GB

8fd411314b2et.jpg 5118018fb95et.jpg
1ad2f4d4b887t.jpg

Norton SI6
af099738c567t.jpg 1f3b33c681eat.jpg

CheckIt 3, with compare to original AMD-16mhz
cf86ffe8dbe6t.jpg 4e1acccfc251t.jpg 74d958dc7108t.jpg

NSSI 60
f6697c3ab3b4t.jpg 2a7f2fc115a6t.jpg 1572a4aecde1t.jpg

Comptest 2.60
888d8c0c64a9t.jpg 0733728f39a1t.jpg 766af44dc14et.jpg

Landmark 2.0 and 6.0
7bf52f5634fet.jpg a395899ff1aet.jpg

PMIPS 1.00 and TopBench, PC_Info 4.04
6aa087160c76t.jpg 69522f45b0det.jpg 2cac318abfc2t.jpg

CCT286, ATPERF 2.03
70469ad80f95t.jpg 40bad7bd5027t.jpg
TIME = 898. Calculating: 1 / 898 * 10000 = 11 mb/s

System performance analysis:
36eb6405d884t.jpg

agSI 1.2.3:
cf2ced881628t.jpg

3DBench, Wolf3D FastDemo with Soundblaster (ESS1868) + 320kb XMS + FullScreen:
23ef65582b30t.jpg 6f4601f1adc2t.jpg

Result:
Memory Throughput: CCT=11mb/s, CompTest=12mb/s, System performance analysis=12mb/s, agSI=12mb/s

This 286 motherboard is the fastest to date, due to the Zero-Wait-State.
But you need to install the heat sink to cool the memory chips Siemens 60ns (1mb RAM). Otherwise, there are glitches data.
99ef9e0c6832t.jpg

For 30MHz, you must find the RAM-chips in the 50ns or 45ns.
a741ff5d8222t.jpg
This requires soldering on the SIMM-30 🙁

Any processor (Harris-20 or Harris-25) quietly works on 30 MHz, Not required Cooler!
Any memory (60ns or 70ns) in 30MHz if switched RAM to 1WS. But it will be slower than a 25 MHz 0WS
file.php?fid=857&key=884229152
"Red" = the best.

Thank you.

Benchmarks XT-286-386 in GoogleDOC: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tPId4 … dit?usp=sharing

Last edited by Ekb on 2015-12-22, 21:48. Edited 5 times in total.

Reply 14 of 52, by soneill73

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

That's pretty cool. My first computer was a 286, I loved that thing. I remember running Doom and Duke 3D and my friends not believing I could without a 386. They were great little, underestimated computers in their time. So much better than an 8088 but people still didn't give them much credit. Mine served me through high school and all 4 years of college. Thanks for sharing.

It's only junk if no one wants it...

486DX4-100, Pentium 133
P200 mmx - Win95, S3 Virge DX, Creative Voodoo2, Yamaha OPL3
Piii 1GHz - Win98 SE, BFG FX5900, STB Voodoo2 SLI, SB Audigy2 ZS
P4 2.8 GHz - Win98 SE, GF6200 OC, Canopus Pure3D ii SLI, Yamaha XG

Reply 15 of 52, by Malvineous

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Definitely can't run Doom or Duke 3D on a 286, it lacks the flat-model protected mode used by these games. Your first PC must have been at least a 386 if it could run these games!

Reply 16 of 52, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Ekb:
wow... great results.

I'm waiting for Harris-25Mhz cpus and will see if this board will do 25MHz as from 5 Harris-20 none work at 25Mhz. Not sure if the board or cpus are the problem.

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 18 of 52, by 386_junkie

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Ekb wrote:
For 30MHz, you must find the RAM-chips in the 50ns or 45ns. http://s017.radikal.ru/i402/1509/5e/a741ff5d8222t.jpg This requires […]
Show full quote

For 30MHz, you must find the RAM-chips in the 50ns or 45ns.
a741ff5d8222t.jpg
This requires soldering on the SIMM-30 🙁

What is this...?

Anyone?

Compaq Systempro; EISA Dual 386 ¦ Compaq Junkiepro; EISA Dual 386 ¦ ALR Powerpro; EISA Dual 386

EISA Graphic Cards ¦ EISA Graphic Card Benchmarks