Reply 20 of 35, by PhilsComputerLab
- Rank
- l33t++
wrote:Still about the monitor:
Can you manually adjust V-H position? Does it have an automatic screen adjustment?
It does have adjustment for V and H position. Auto adjust is triggered by holding down the left-most button for a few seconds.
wrote:Very nice! I agree about 2.0 speakers for retro DOS. I have a pair of beige Gateway Altec Lansings that have good volume, bass and treble, more than adequate without a sub-woofer. They've got a headphone jack which can add another dimension too. One day i would like to get into 486 and earlier systems. I limit myself to what I can find or be given, and no luck yet with anything earlier than P54C so far.
Thanks for the write-up and pics. Very interesting!
I got this stuff years ago, it's harder now and more expensive too 😒
wrote:Slightly off topic, but relevant to building a retro PC, I'm actually also looking into getting an LCD 4:3 (square) monitor for […]
wrote:Still about the monitor:
Can you manually adjust V-H position? Does it have an automatic screen adjustment?
Slightly off topic, but relevant to building a retro PC, I'm actually also looking into getting an LCD 4:3 (square) monitor for my older PC's that still runs via VLB or ISA graphics cards.
Although I have plenty of CRT monitors (two 17", one 15" and two 14"), they just take up too much space and the larger ones are quite bulky.My "daily driver" is still a Samsung SyncMaster 2233 (22.5") wide screen LCD, but have noticed that on PC's with either VLB or ISA graphics cards, it sometimes displays "distortion" across the screen (almost like in the "old days" when someone took a video of an image being displayed on a CRT monitor - which, if memory serves correct, is essentially just the refresh rate being picked up on the video). With PCI (and newer) graphics cards, I don't notice this "distortion".
What carlostex has alluded to, I'm also thinking it might be related to the newer wide screen LCD monitors that doesn't quite support the older display standards (resolution, ratio, etc.).Back to the topic, I've always thought a 486DX 33 MHz to be a great CPU for early 90's DOS games. However, I've been thinking on rather using a Cyrix 486DLC 40 MHz instead of a 486DX 33 MHz (purely for nostalgic reasons, since it was the first PC I bought for myself and they tend to be more or less on par with each other in terms of integer performance).
Could the "sped up animation" issue perhaps be related to the VLB graphics and IDE controller cards?
The VLB graphics cards do tend to run much faster (even in de-turbo mode) than a standard ISA graphics card.
Maybe pop in a standard 16-bit ISA graphics card and see whether you still experience the same problems in "de-turbo" mode?
Interesting. Can you describe this distortion, or take a picture? On some cards I do have some sort of vertical banding, it shows up when the same colour fills the screen. With widescreen monitors, make sure they are in 4:3 mode, not every monitor supports this though.
Interesting that you mention the 486DCL40. It is not far behind this machine. On a fast 386 board it scores around 22 or so FPS in 3dbench.
I did try an ISA card, with WD chipset, it scored around 23 FPS. So still quite speedy and way faster than a 386DX 40 MHz. Using the Turbo did slow down the animations.
wrote:Nice build Phil!
I'm in the process of collecting parts for a 486 build - mine will be non-VLB though (16-bit ISA only). I've secured almost everything so far, including an ET4000 1MB card and my old CT3900 AWE32 - all I'm missing is cache chips, RAM and a IDE/Multi-IO card. The IO card has been tough to get hold of for less than 15eur and with the features I need, and the cache chips are pretty expensive!
It'll be a fun project once all the parts are here though!
I might a project on a SX (sucks) 25 MHz 486 and go all ISA. At that lowly clock speed it shouldn't matter much. A great ISA IO card is the one with the GoldStar Prime 2 chip.
wrote:I can't really argue with the CPU choice from an 'adventure games' point of view but, given I was never into those, I would eschew any low-end 486 in favour of at least a DX2-66/80 every single time, purely from a versatility point of view. If you're going 486, I think it should cover an era, not a genre. VLB is somewhat pointless at the lower end of the 486 spectrum, and the system won't play Doom at anything like an acceptable framerate. Trouble is, I say this as a person who own 3x socket 3 boards with a choice of ISA, VLB and PCI, and pretty much all the CPUs as well. I forget that most people have only one (as in your case) or none of these systems available to them, so they make the best of what they've got. And you've definitely done that.
I chose the theme of adventure games to have some sort of focus and theme. Too many games to try out otherwise. I agree that it won't run Doom that well, so I picked a theme that it does do well. 7th Guest for example is also very suitable on this machine and a lot of RPG type games, maybe Ultima Underworld?
wrote:Looks really nice :) Very cool and authentic build. I love the VESA localbus. When I get time and energy, I will rebuild my main […]
Looks really nice 😀
Very cool and authentic build. I love the VESA localbus. When I get time and energy, I will rebuild my main retro rig and try to get my VESA stuff working. It's always been the penultimate 486-era bus in my opinion.
And I totally support your idea of a system for adventure games... It's my favourite genre as well.
Amazing sound setup with the Roland boxes 😀
I have the little brother of your speakers that I use for gaming and such, and I find them surprisingly good.
The Roland music really adds atmosphere and brings these games to life. I noticed the IO controller also has empty sockets. Not quite sure what is meant to go there...
wrote:That system would also play games like Ultima 7 and the Ultima Underworlds really well. Other similar RPGs too--Wizardry 7, Might and Magic 3-5, and flight sims of the early 90s: Aces of the Pacific, Aces over Europe, Red Baron.
True! A lot of the 3D games that chug a bit on a 386, but are too fast on a DX2 should run well.
wrote:Wow, that's a very nice-looking build. Well done. I wish I had the time and money to make builds like that... sigh.
And I see you've been made a mod, Phil! Congrats, you've earned it for a long time now.
😊 Thanks
When I got these parts they cost little. I have an Acer 486 (stripped now) that I got for 486. It's OEM, weird looking motherboard with riser card, but it has ISA, PCI and VLB and, well it works 😀