VOGONS


Luck with Dos32a Beta??

Topic actions

First post, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Has anyone used the 8-22-05 beta of Dos32a? I want to use it but i'm afraid of how unstable it is. Has anyone had good luck with it?

Reply 1 of 12, by mirekluza

User metadata
Rank DOSBox Moderator
Rank
DOSBox Moderator

Just try it... What can happen? It will not blow your computer...

Mirek

Reply 2 of 12, by HunterZ

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

If it does blow up your computer though, be sure to post some pictures.

Reply 3 of 12, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Eh..nothing special...nothing to write home about yet. To be honest, i would just stick with the 7.35 for now

IBM ThinkPad X40
1.2Ghz with 2MB L2 cache
1.0GB DDR2 SDRAM
Intel 852/855GME Graphics Media Accelerator with 64MB
12'' LCD Screen
SoundMax Integrated Audio

Peas Pobie!

Reply 5 of 12, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I wonder where my Dark Forces CD is. I am quite impressed with how well ST: AFU runs. Before Dos32a, it took forever for anything to work correctly. Now, it runs like a dream. Does anyone know whether it is necessary to use this for ST: Judgement Rites or 25th anniversary?

Also, here is a picture from Sttng for you to look at. Take note of the Dos32a version. Beta 9.0.2

Also, even though it says that -2128 xms is available, the game still runs, anyone know why?

[/img]

Reply 6 of 12, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

If anyone is interested, here is a screenshot of 9.0.5 that was released recently.

Reply 7 of 12, by `Moe`

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Regarding the negative EMS value: you are probably using close to 64MB memory (probably 63MB, the maximum amount dosbox supports), and the program stores that amount in a short (2-byte) integer. Which is fine, only if you interpret an unsigned short value of 63000 as signed short, it's about -2000. I guess the output routines do that - they simply interpret the number differently.

Reply 8 of 12, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Well, it's set to use 63mb actually. Nice guess. Also, is it worth setting umb=max? does it give a performance boost over umb=true?

Reply 9 of 12, by wd

User metadata
Rank DOSBox Author
Rank
DOSBox Author

Surely not. It's intended to allow larger TSRs to be loaded
into the UMBs, but requires ems to be off.

Reply 10 of 12, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I wish DOS games didn't require this stuff. I have a 1.0GB of DDR RAM in my laptop but ST:JR still complains that i don't have 2mb of ems free unless i use dosbox. heehehe

IBM ThinkPad X40
1.2Ghz with 2MB L2 cache
1.0GB DDR2 SDRAM
Intel 852/855GME Graphics Media Accelerator with 64MB
12'' LCD Screen
SoundMax Integrated Audio

Peas Pobie!

Reply 11 of 12, by eL_PuSHeR

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Then it seems you haven't played too many games in the MS-DOS era. Some of them were a real pain to configure. 😀

Intel i7 5960X
Gigabye GA-X99-Gaming 5
8 GB DDR4 (2100)
8 GB GeForce GTX 1070 G1 Gaming (Gigabyte)

Reply 12 of 12, by GreatBarrier86

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Very true. the extent of my dos gaming is the 3 st games. jr, 25th and, afu

IBM ThinkPad X40
1.2Ghz with 2MB L2 cache
1.0GB DDR2 SDRAM
Intel 852/855GME Graphics Media Accelerator with 64MB
12'' LCD Screen
SoundMax Integrated Audio

Peas Pobie!