VOGONS


First post, by m3stang

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hello everyone,

Long time lurker and first time posting. About a year or so ago I built a new “retro” pc, although probably not that retro by a lot of people’s standards it’s around the time I was 6 years old that this thing would have been relevant. I can’t remember the motherboard but it had a P3 866 MHz, 768MB of ram and a GeForce 6200 AGP. Flight simulator 2000, Half-Life, Halo CE, and Morrowind are slide shows on it. I upgraded the cpu to a P3 1GHz but it made pretty much no difference. Running windows ME as well since it’s the only one I was able to get all drivers working with after a lot of fiddling. And it works with flash drives which helps a ton. I ordered an ATi 9600XT with 128MB and hoping this cures the issues it’s having. I think it’s GPU bottlenecked but maybe I just have unrealistic expectations of playable experiences in these games with this system. I thought I remember 1GHz been insanely fast for 2000 and the same goes for 768MB Ram, but maybe I’m wrong. Thanks for any input!

EDIT: wanted to add that 3DMark 2000 runs amazing on it. It scored 6324. Not sure if that’s a great number but it gets over 100 fps in some tests and over 200 in others.

Reply 1 of 11, by bZbZbZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Yes you were GPU limited. It seems like nVidia made various versions of the GeForce 6200 AGP but all of them were pretty slow. A Radeon 9600XT should be a better match for the system.

Another thing I might point out is that some of the games you listed are newer than your system, and would run better on a newer computer running Windows XP (they might even run well on a modern computer).

Reply 2 of 11, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Pentium 3 is good for DOS games and early Windows games up to about 2000. Athlon 64 is good enough up to about 2004.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, 80GB HDD, Yamaha SM718 ISA, 19" AOC 9GlrA
Athlon 64 3400+, MSI K8T Neo V, 1GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT 512MB, 250GB HDD, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS

Reply 3 of 11, by ciornyi

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

hey mate,

Halo CE and Morrowind is quite demanding games for your build i remember it was not that good on Athlon 1.4GHz with Geforce 3 and 9600PRO after . Was 15-40 fps @1024x768 at high settings.

DOS: 166mmx/16mb/Y719/S3virge
DOS/95: PII333/128mb/AWE64/TNT2M64
Win98: P3 900/256mb/SB live/3dfx V3
Win Me: Athlon 1333/256mb/Audigy2/Geforce 2 GTS
Win XP: E8600/4096mb/SB X-fi/HD6850

Reply 4 of 11, by RandomStranger

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Half- Life should do well, I never played Halo CE, but Morrowind needs a fast GPU. I don't know if a 9600 XT will be enough to max it out and have a consistently high frame rate.

sreq.png retrogamer-s.png

Reply 5 of 11, by m3stang

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I got it in and installed the new drivers and it still runs Halo pretty bad honestly. Scored 700 points higher in 3DMark 2000 though. I still have to try the other games but based on a slight score increase and no visible difference in Halo, I imagine it is still going to be bad 😁. I play those games on my modern gaming PC just fun to play with old stuff (isn't that why we are all here?). Gotta find my copies of NFS 3 Hot Pursuit and NFS High Stakes again. Those also ran poorly when I first built this PC, might be better now.

Reply 6 of 11, by bZbZbZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Halo is just too new a game for your retro system. I guess can just play it on your modern PC as you said.

NFS 3 and 4 should run really well on a Radeon 9600. You could probably play at 1600x1200 (or whatever 4:3-ish resolution your monitor supports) with the details maxed out. I believe NFS 3 and 4 don't run properly on Windows XP (or newer) out of the box. I have gotten NFS 4 (High Stakes aka Road Challenge) to run in Windows XP with a patch. So these are great games to play on a Windows 98 retro PC.

Reply 7 of 11, by m3stang

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
bZbZbZ wrote on 2022-02-09, 21:52:

Halo is just too new a game for your retro system. I guess can just play it on your modern PC as you said.

NFS 3 and 4 should run really well on a Radeon 9600. You could probably play at 1600x1200 (or whatever 4:3-ish resolution your monitor supports) with the details maxed out. I believe NFS 3 and 4 don't run properly on Windows XP (or newer) out of the box. I have gotten NFS 4 (High Stakes aka Road Challenge) to run in Windows XP with a patch. So these are great games to play on a Windows 98 retro PC.

Yeah I found them, but they don’t recognize the gpu of course. Says I need to install DirectX 5 Drivers when launching NFS3 and says DirectX 6 drivers with high stakes. Both work with the 6200. Probably need to patch them or change the d3da.dll. I have not played these since the early 2000s regularly because I never got them to run on XP and up correctly.

Reply 8 of 11, by bZbZbZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I use this patch for Need For Speed High Stakes: https://www.hsscoring.com/HSGuide/
There is a "Stock Pack" which (among other things) adds support for Windows XP and newer graphics cards. There is also an "Expansion Pack" that adds more cars/tracks, etc. There is a note that IP Lounge multiplayer doesn't work in Win 9x (XP or above only) but for single player Win98 should be fine.

I was able to play NFS4 with an Athlon 64 + Radeon 9800 Pro in Windows ME, at 1600x1200 with 4xAA. I didn't bother trying NFS3 on that machine because NFS4 with the "Expansion Pack" contained most of the NFS3 content anyway.

Reply 9 of 11, by m3stang

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
bZbZbZ wrote on 2022-02-10, 21:53:

I use this patch for Need For Speed High Stakes: https://www.hsscoring.com/HSGuide/
There is a "Stock Pack" which (among other things) adds support for Windows XP and newer graphics cards. There is also an "Expansion Pack" that adds more cars/tracks, etc. There is a note that IP Lounge multiplayer doesn't work in Win 9x (XP or above only) but for single player Win98 should be fine.

I was able to play NFS4 with an Athlon 64 + Radeon 9800 Pro in Windows ME, at 1600x1200 with 4xAA. I didn't bother trying NFS3 on that machine because NFS4 with the "Expansion Pack" contained most of the NFS3 content anyway.

Awesome thanks for the link! I found some other patches yesterday, like one where someone made it work with different GPUs. I think this is the patch I was looking for! I might just have to do a clean install of WinME at this point. After installing Office XP on it to remember what it looked like, it has started to lock up and BSOD like 3 times an hour. Also, I think my CD Drive is dying all of a sudden. Suddenly half-life said please insert CD and it dropped out of explorer. Idk, this thing is starting to get more and more expensive 🙁.

Reply 10 of 11, by m3stang

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Coming back to this PC now. Just ordered some Star Tech IDE/SATA converters so I could switch to SSD (bought a 120GB one in case there were size issues) and use a SATA DVD drive I have that is new. With my old drive dying I did not want another old ebay IDE drive. Excited to see how it works!

Reply 11 of 11, by AlexZ

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I don't see much point in playing game like Need for Speed 3 at 1600x1200 as the game simply doesn't have sufficiently detailed textures. It came out when 16MB graphics cards were the norm. I play it at 800x600. Higher resolutions only start making sense for games from 2001 and beyond.

Pentium III 900E, ECS P6BXT-A+, 384MB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 128MB, Voodoo 2 12MB, 80GB HDD, Yamaha SM718 ISA, 19" AOC 9GlrA
Athlon 64 3400+, MSI K8T Neo V, 1GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 7600GT 512MB, 250GB HDD, Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS