VOGONS


First post, by Jaron

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

So I'm looking to upgrade the GPU on my Win98 machine and I want to make sure it'll work before I buy it. The P2B's AGP port uses the 3.3V notch, but I can't see anything in the manual stating what mode it can run in, only a table listing the differences in PCI, AGP x1, x2, and x4 bandwidth. Currently I have a TNT2 and it works fine.

I want to get a 380XL and it has the 3.3V notch in it. However, yesterday I tried a Radeon 9000 in the P2B and it wouldn't even POST. I'm pretty sure the Radeon is still good; it's been sitting on my shelf for years untouched and it worked last time I tried it all those years ago. I'll try it in another mboard to verify. But, if there's anyone who can say for certain the P2B's AGP slot can still work with GeForce4 generation cards, it would be helpful.

I mean, sure AGP is supposed to have backwards compatibility, but we all know standards adherence could be rather spotty in the late 90s and early 00s.

Thanks.

Reply 1 of 12, by Paadam

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

GF4 will work for sure, Radeon 9000 and up often have issues.
Geforce 4 Ti4200 is sure choice.

Many 3Dfx and Pentium III-S stuff.
My amibay FS thread: www.amibay.com/showthread.php?88030-Man ... -370-dual)

Reply 2 of 12, by Jaron

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Thanks for the reply.

I have a few reasons for preferring an MX440 over the Ti 4200. MX cards are often around $40, where most of the decent Ti 4200 cards I see are $80 USD and up. With the MX 440 cards being essentially GF2 cards with better memory controllers, I think that also makes the hardware more favorable from a compatibility standpoint to Win98 and DX7 games. Also, from a performance standpoint, it's going in a PIII 450 MHz system. Since the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor, I don't know how much benefit a Ti 4200 will have over an MX. The 380XGL card I'm looking at is only $30, and that guarantees I don't risk getting a 64-bit memory MX card.

Reply 4 of 12, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Jaron wrote on 2022-11-29, 23:21:

Since the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor, I don't know how much benefit a Ti 4200 will have over an MX.

Maybe slightly faster in higher resolutions like 1280x1024 and up, but the difference is likely negligible with a 450 MHz CPU.

In terms of features, the Ti4200 supports EMBM while the MX440 does not. If you play Win9x games which use that, you might want a card which supports it. But it's a very minor thing IMO.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Athlon64 3400+ / Asus K8V-MX / 5900XT / Audigy2
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 970 / X-Fi

Reply 5 of 12, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

GF4 Ti is pretty much the best card you can get for a Slot 1 PC but agree overkill for your PC.
The MX440 is a good choice which is closer related to the GF2 MX then a "real" GF4 anyway

Reply 6 of 12, by Jaron

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
rasz_pl wrote on 2022-11-30, 10:01:

with AGP its if it fits it sits

Well, we know it's supposed to be like that. But as I said, with the Radeon 9000 in the slot, the machine won't even POST. And I know the Radeon is good because it works just fine in my A7N8X-X board. Maybe I've got the P2B jumpers set in a way that conflicts with the Radeon. I'll take a look at the manual and double check.

rasz_pl wrote on 2022-11-30, 10:01:

but I would avoid quadro for something as basic, cheap and plentiful as MX440

The risk with buying a used MX440 is it's not always certain whether you're getting a 64- or 128-bit memory bus card. The 380 was only ever made in 128-bit, and with normal drivers, it'll perform the same as a normal MX. Not only that, but the one I see available is the same price as an MX, so it seems like a no-brainer to me.

Hmm, bump mapping would be nice, but not twice the price nice. And the only game I have on that list is Descent 3.

chinny22 wrote on 2022-11-30, 11:17:

GF4 Ti is pretty much the best card you can get for a Slot 1 PC but agree overkill for your PC.

I've already got an overkill WinXP machine ( i7-2600K + GTX 750 Ti ), so I already use that for anything that can run well on XP. This one is basically for DX7 and down.

Thanks, all, just wanted some confirmation it would work and it looks like I'm good to go.

Reply 7 of 12, by Joseph_Joestar

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Jaron wrote on 2022-11-30, 19:42:

The risk with buying a used MX440 is it's not always certain whether you're getting a 64- or 128-bit memory bus card.

Rule of thumb, if the MX440 has 4 memory chips in total (e.g. 2 on each side) and is passively cooled, chances are high that it's 64-bit. Similarly, if it has active cooling (fan+heatsink) and more than 4 memory chips in total, then it's likely the 128-bit version. There are exceptions to this of course, but it can serve as a guideline when shopping solely based on pictures posted by the seller.

BTW, although harder to find, MX460 cards are always 128-bit and perform slightly better as well.

PC#1: Pentium MMX 166 / Soyo SY-5BT / S3 Trio64V+ / Voodoo1 / YMF719 / AWE64 Gold / SC-155
PC#2: AthlonXP 2100+ / ECS K7VTA3 / Voodoo3 / Audigy2 / Vortex2
PC#3: Athlon64 3400+ / Asus K8V-MX / 5900XT / Audigy2
PC#4: i5-3570K / MSI Z77A-G43 / GTX 970 / X-Fi

Reply 8 of 12, by TrashPanda

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Joseph_Joestar wrote on 2022-12-01, 19:12:
Jaron wrote on 2022-11-30, 19:42:

The risk with buying a used MX440 is it's not always certain whether you're getting a 64- or 128-bit memory bus card.

Rule of thumb, if the MX440 has 4 memory chips in total (e.g. 2 on each side) and is passively cooled, chances are high that it's 64-bit. Similarly, if it has active cooling (fan+heatsink) and more than 4 memory chips in total, then it's likely the 128-bit version. There are exceptions to this of course, but it can serve as a guideline when shopping solely based on pictures posted by the seller.

BTW, although harder to find, MX460 cards are always 128-bit and perform slightly better as well.

Another option is finding a 128bit 128mb MX4000 which is essentially a MX440 with 8x and MX460 clocks using a non gimped NV18c core, I have one and I find it to be a really nice alternative to the MX440 that can overclock really well with active cooling. (It also tends to be cheaper than the better known MX440 and MX460)

Reply 9 of 12, by Jaron

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

My understanding is the MX 4000 is just an overclocked 440SE, which itself was an overclocked 440 with the gimped memory bus.

I mean, I know some card manufacturers ignored Nvidia's and ATI's specs and didn't gimp some cards that were supposed to be, but I don't know that I want to sort through eBay looking for those specific variants when 95% of them are just pulled from old Dells.

Reply 10 of 12, by TrashPanda

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Jaron wrote on 2022-12-01, 21:09:

My understanding is the MX 4000 is just an overclocked 440SE, which itself was an overclocked 440 with the gimped memory bus.

I mean, I know some card manufacturers ignored Nvidia's and ATI's specs and didn't gimp some cards that were supposed to be, but I don't know that I want to sort through eBay looking for those specific variants when 95% of them are just pulled from old Dells.

Yeah the 64bit versions are indeed the shitty MX440SE rebadged . .you can throw that trash in the bin, you can find the 128bit models on the bay easy enough and they are substantially better in both memory bus and clocks, finding a MX460 would be much harder and more expensive, even the normal MX440 can be more expensive. (The MX4000 got a bad name from them 64bit trash models so tends to sell cheaper)

Just wanted to put it out there that the 128bit models are a really good cheap alternative.

Reply 11 of 12, by rasz_pl

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

just looked at local auction house
one MX460 $16
64bit MX440 tons at $2-4 😀
first 128bit one https://www.prolink-usa.com/english/product/v … -mx440-64a.html $5 with shipping buy it now
same dude sells Leadtek WinFast A180BT (mx4000) for $4 with shipping and few $10 Athlons socket A
Sparkle SP7300M4T 128MB $7
another sparkle SP7100M4 64MB $15
XELO GeForce4 MX440SE 64MB 128bit $15
tons of pixelview/prolink ones < $15

Open Source AT&T Globalyst/NCR/FIC 486-GAC-2 proprietary Cache Module reproduction

Reply 12 of 12, by TrashPanda

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
rasz_pl wrote on 2022-12-02, 06:08:
just looked at local auction house one MX460 $16 64bit MX440 tons at $2-4 :) first 128bit one https://www.prolink-usa.com/englis […]
Show full quote

just looked at local auction house
one MX460 $16
64bit MX440 tons at $2-4 😀
first 128bit one https://www.prolink-usa.com/english/product/v … -mx440-64a.html $5 with shipping buy it now
same dude sells Leadtek WinFast A180BT (mx4000) for $4 with shipping and few $10 Athlons socket A
Sparkle SP7300M4T 128MB $7
another sparkle SP7100M4 64MB $15
XELO GeForce4 MX440SE 64MB 128bit $15
tons of pixelview/prolink ones < $15

Sounds like you have access to a lot of cheap cards(64bit is E-Waste), local to me is ..uhh Evilbay and Aliexpress so they are the only prices I have and can reference.

Dont even have a E-Waste handler here, closest one is 5 hours away by car. (I really wish I did .. I would be there at least a few times a week)