VOGONS


First post, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I have a 486 motherboard with some cache.
It looks like the cache ram is 512kb but the tag is a 256kb chip.
So my computer will only see 256kb of ram.
Is the tag ram chip the wrong one for these 512kb. Cache ram chips ?
The motherboard can support up to 512kb of cache.
When I set the motherboard jumpers for 512kb it only sees 256kb.

See photo.

Last edited by Intel486dx33 on 2019-05-19, 12:51. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 1 of 17, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Tag chip is fine. Check the jumpers.

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 2 of 17, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I did, please read first message again. I edited it.

Reply 3 of 17, by kixs

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Eh... you need 1024Kb cache chips. With 512Kb you only get 256KB. Tag is fine.

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 4 of 17, by Intel486dx33

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Okay, thanks.

Reply 6 of 17, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

4 512Kb cache chips make 2048Kb of cache. 8 bits is 1 Byte, so 2048 Kb is 256KB; your cache is fine.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 7 of 17, by GigAHerZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
appiah4 wrote:

4 512Kb cache chips make 2048Kb of cache. 8 bits is 1 Byte, so 2048 Kb is 256KB; your cache is fine.

Perfect!

Except, kilo is lowercased k, uppercased K is Kelvin. 😀
(No offence, just had to put my two cents in... 😜 )

"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - And i intend to get every last bit out of it even after loading every damn driver!

Reply 9 of 17, by GigAHerZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

@Deksor, well, you can use both, but you are right - kilo is ALWAYS 1000 and never 1024, kibi is 1024.

"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - And i intend to get every last bit out of it even after loading every damn driver!

Reply 12 of 17, by RiP

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
ph4nt0m wrote:
RiP wrote:

Why do some boards use 5 chips instead of 4 for cache memory? 😕
https://stason.org/TULARC/pc/motherboards/E/E … AY-EV-8038.html

There can be two tag chips. Sometimes it works faster this way.

Thanks for reply.
But actually, there are three tag chips, two bigger and one smaller at bottom 😕

Reply 13 of 17, by ph4nt0m

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
RiP wrote:
ph4nt0m wrote:
RiP wrote:

Why do some boards use 5 chips instead of 4 for cache memory? 😕
https://stason.org/TULARC/pc/motherboards/E/E … AY-EV-8038.html

There can be two tag chips. Sometimes it works faster this way.

Thanks for reply.
But actually, there are three tag chips, two bigger and one smaller at bottom 😕

Some boards can take an additional chip to make extended tags for larger cacheable range or in order to enable write back functionality. This 1x64K chip seems to do the latter.

My Active Sales on CPU-World

Reply 14 of 17, by GigAHerZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Sometimes some motherboard have 1 chip for tag, and one chip for write-back buffering. 😉 (I have a 386 with that - doubles the memory write speed (Y) )

"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - And i intend to get every last bit out of it even after loading every damn driver!

Reply 15 of 17, by ph4nt0m

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
GigAHerZ wrote:

Sometimes some motherboard have 1 chip for tag, and one chip for write-back buffering. 😉 (I have a 386 with that - doubles the memory write speed (Y) )

PC Chips M321 ?

My Active Sales on CPU-World

Reply 16 of 17, by RiP

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Thanks all!
My mobos are EV-18108/EV-8038 and they have PC Chips too but not sure about the exact chipset.

Reply 17 of 17, by GigAHerZ

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
ph4nt0m wrote:
GigAHerZ wrote:

Sometimes some motherboard have 1 chip for tag, and one chip for write-back buffering. 😉 (I have a 386 with that - doubles the memory write speed (Y) )

PC Chips M321 ?

Bingo!

"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - And i intend to get every last bit out of it even after loading every damn driver!