It should. Those are simple, low power cards. Just give it a try and see if you have any reboot problems.

I suggest drivers from the 45.xx series or older.

swaaye wrote:

It should. Those are simple, low power cards. Just give it a try and see if you have any reboot problems.

I suggest drivers from the 45.xx series or older.

Thanks for the suggestion on the drivers. 😎

I'm currently running on a Diamond Stealth III 16 mb APG card with a 12 mb Voodoo 2 pci card and I'm not having any problems. Of course, I'm always looking to upgrade. 😉

I'd go with a real geforce 2 (pro/ultra). At least those have rudimentary shader support. And of course T&L. Geforce 3 cards would probably a bit overkill for that system 😁

gravitone wrote:

I'd go with a real geforce 2 (pro/ultra). At least those have rudimentary shader support. And of course T&L. Geforce 3 cards would probably a bit overkill for that system 😁

Hey, I received the card for free! 😁

Beggar's can't be choosers! 😉

swaaye, I dl the 45.23 drivers from nvidia's website. They did have up to 81.xx drivers there. Do the newer drivers break a lot of things? Or the benefit isn't there for my old hardware?

I had problems with stability on my 440BX mobo with drivers after 56.xx. That was with GeForce FX though. Overall I think you are probably best off with drivers released after, but near to, the release of the games you want to play.

Actually all GeForce 2 cards have the same featureset. The speed is all that varies. GeForce 2 MX is essentially one half of GeForce 2 GTS. The MX100 and 200 have limited memory bandwidth however.

I've also got a Geforce 2 and I use driver version 29.42. In 3DMark2000 I get significant more points with this driver than when I use the driver that came with Windows XP.