Reply 20 of 27, by TheLazy1
Maybe when I get a bit more time I'll try a uClibc based gentoo install and see how it runs with the latest Xorg and either fluxbox or XFCE.
Maybe when I get a bit more time I'll try a uClibc based gentoo install and see how it runs with the latest Xorg and either fluxbox or XFCE.
Do it stage one 😁
Just to see how long it take to compile everything :p
R9 3900X/X470 Taichi/32GB 3600CL15/5700XT AE/Marantz PM7005
i7 980X/R9 290X/X-Fi titanium | FX-57/X1950XTX/Audigy 2ZS
Athlon 1000T Slot A/GeForce 3/AWE64G | K5 PR 200/ET6000/AWE32
Ppro 200 1M/Voodoo 3 2000/AWE 32 | iDX4 100/S3 864 VLB/SB16
I recommend either of these distros:
http://distro.ibiblio.org/baslinux/
http://www.micheleandreoli.it/mulinux/mulinux.html
Both are very simple, run fine on a 486, and can be installed from floppies.
wrote:There seems to be no way around editing the config file for the graphics if you are going to use an X-Windows systems on an older distro, at least for my setup there wasn't.
It is inevitable even now, is it not?
http://xkcd.com/963/
wrote:A little sidegoal though - just want to see how the 486 i'm using is able to handle various multimedia stuff in linux environment, playing mp3 plus browsing net etc...
Well, I can answer that for you right now. A 486 is just barely capable of playing back an MP3 since the calculation is floating-point heavy. The advent of the Pentium is what popularized MP3 because the floating-point performance was that much better. If you play an MP3 on a 486 and then try to do anything else, the audio will start to skip or pause.
There, I just saved you from having to install a unix distribution 😀 Although if you were still bent on doing so, FreeBSD 2.2.9 (ancient) is very snappy and runs on 386s and higher, and comes in a 1.44MB floppy distribution (although many newer versions have a dual-1.44MB floppy distro that you boot and then install the OS over the internet). If you need a link to 2.2.9 let me know.
IMO, the best reason to put a UNIX on one of these old machines is to have tools like dd, parted, rsync, wget, etc to back up and test various configurations. Like he said, I wouldn't want to use it for MP3s, etc, especially with VBR being standard these days.
wrote:wrote:A little sidegoal though - just want to see how the 486 i'm using is able to handle various multimedia stuff in linux environment, playing mp3 plus browsing net etc...
Well, I can answer that for you right now. A 486 is just barely capable of playing back an MP3 since the calculation is floating-point heavy. The advent of the Pentium is what popularized MP3 because the floating-point performance was that much better. If you play an MP3 on a 486 and then try to do anything else, the audio will start to skip or pause.
There, I just saved you from having to install a unix distribution 😀
Well, there are MP3 players for DOS. DOSAmp, for instance dates back to that era.
DOS, Linux, etc. aren't the limiting factor -- a 486 is. IIRC you need roughly a 486/100 to play back an MP3. Here's someone trying to get a 386-40 to play back an mp3 and he can only do so at 16KHz: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Jj97NXgHw4