What benchmarks to use,to compare Via MVP3 with Ali Alladin 5 \ VOGONS

What benchmarks to use,to compare Via MVP3 with Ali Alladin 5

Topic actions

Post a reply

First post, by Nahkri

Posted on 2013-12-24, 07:56

Nahkri Offline

Rank Member

Rank: Member
Posts: 437
Joined: 2013-02-10, 21:23
Location: Karlsburg:RO

I managed to get a couple of mvp3 boards lately,a PCChips M577 and a Soyo 5EHM v1.0 and i want to run some test and compare them to my Jetway 542C which has the Alladin 5 chipset,in order to see which of the 2 chipsets has better performance and use that one for my SS7 build.
The Alladin 5 chipset will have the advantage of using udma 66,while both mvp3 boards only support udma 33.

For 3d performance i,ll be using games and 3d mark,but i don't know what benchmarks to use in order to test memory transfer speed,cache speed etc.,can anyone make some suggestions?

Reply 1 of 6, by kixs

Posted on 2013-12-24, 18:26

kixs Offline

Rank l33t

Rank: l33t
Posts: 3370
Joined: 2013-01-31, 02:08
Location: Slovenia

The usual...

For DOS:
Speedsys (CPU, Cache, Memory, VGA speed)
3dbench (CPU,VGA)
PCPlayer for DOS (different VGA/VESA modes)
Dooms timedemo
Quake timedemo
Vspeed (vga)

Quake3 TImedemo
PCPlayer DirectX
Aida64 (CPU,Mem, Cache, HDD)

Requests are also possible... /msg kixs

Reply 2 of 6, by Nahkri

Posted on 2013-12-24, 20:51

Nahkri Offline

Rank Member

Rank: Member
Posts: 437
Joined: 2013-02-10, 21:23
Location: Karlsburg:RO

I,m going to use the build for windows so i''ll be using win games and benchmarks,i remeber sisoft sandra having some benchmarks included.

Reply 3 of 6, by keropi

Posted on 2013-12-24, 21:06

keropi Offline

Rank l33t++

Rank: l33t++
Posts: 9266
Joined: 2003-09-08, 06:45
Location: Greece

I would also suggest Sandra for win9x benchmarks
I'm a fan of the MVP-3 chipset, been working with a HOT-591p for several years now and I'm very satisfied with it

🎵 🎧 ⏳ ⚡ PCMIDI MPU , OrpheusII , Action Rewind , Megacard and 🎶GoldLib soundcard website

Reply 4 of 6, by Mau1wurf1977

Posted on 2013-12-25, 07:41

Mau1wurf1977 Offline

Rank l33t++

Rank: l33t++
Posts: 7652
Joined: 2010-08-27, 04:15
Location: Western Australia

Hmmm just saying, for Windows a BX440 platform is more stable, faster and easier to work with 😀

3dmark is a good benchmark. Also look out for games that have built-in benchmarks. You can look through old reviews and see what tests they used. ID games always had some timedemo built in.

My website with reviews, demos, drivers, tutorials and more...
My YouTube channel

Reply 5 of 6, by Forevermore

Posted on 2013-12-25, 11:22

Forevermore Offline

Rank Member

Rank: Member
Posts: 120
Joined: 2013-10-04, 07:48
Location: Australia

Never had stability issues with Aladdin V. MVP3 on the other hand, didn't like my K62/500 very much. Conversely I ran an M2 366gp without as many problems.

So many combinations to make, so few cases to put them in.

Reply 6 of 6, by noshutdown

Posted on 2013-12-25, 14:14

noshutdown Offline

Rank Oldbie

Rank: Oldbie
Posts: 1179
Joined: 2010-07-23, 17:04
Location: China

i always suggest superpi for cpu benchmark, 3dmark and quake2/3 for actual gaming benchmark. unreal would do too.
while ali5 has superb memory performance, i have to accept that mvp3's large onboard cache actually has more advantage.
ali5's agp compatibility in win2000 is also terrible, all drivers and utilities just do no help, and i guess they are for win98 only. mvp3 also has some compatibility issues but they can be fixed with the 4in1 driver, and now it goes very well in win2000, with many 3d cards tested, or maybe its just my board(tmc ti5vgf).

Go to top of page Go to top of page

Back to General Old Hardware

Main menu

Common searches