Billyray520 wrote:
That's what I would do too! 😎 I like your pics Artex! My Gateway 2000 P4D-66 is from 2-95; what year is your Tower P5-75? Are those 486's or Pentiums?
Here's mine before I upgraded the sram. You can see the soldered in "issi" 128k at the bottom right, to the left of the open sockets (which now have the additional "issi" 128k for 256k total L2 cache) I also added new parity RAM for 128 MB after this shot was taken. You can see the 486 ZIF socket and passive heat sink. I also removed the 14.4k modem at the bottom. (Windows 95b) The new Dallas RTC is just visible in the upper right corner.
I wonder if the same RAM you have for both external cache and system RAM will work in mine... because I am having such a hard time finding any RAM stick in my pile to work with this thing. Anything special about the Parity RAM?
Cache itself, I dunno... I tried activating all the 2nd Cache Size jumpers but it'd only read 128k of all the chips I inserted, which should have been 256k. Though it hangs after it shows 128k on the post screen. There are odd and even banks. I wouldn't mind sticking just 128k in there if I could get that to work too.
Either way, I guess I don't have to have it fully upgraded. 🤣
devius wrote:
Not really. 486s only get really slow when you disable the internal cache. Having no external cache will make it a little bit slower in some applications, but you won't notice a difference. That said, a SX-25 is really slow even by 486 standards 🤣
Hmm, I thought the 25Mhz chip performed a bit better than it is here with external cache on some applications... but I honestly can't recall since it's been quite a long time ago since I last ran a 486 of this speed. Not that it matters. This is perfectly fine, I have my bigger Gateway 2000 that already has a 100MHz 486 Overdrive. 😀
I just would like something in between 25 and 100MHz.. I had a 66MHz AMD board but it ended up just giving beep codes... I recently got a diagnostics board so maybe I could check it again.
devius wrote:
It won't make this PC run Doom any better if you add cache, but this being an OEM machine you probably need very specific chips with the right capacity and speed rating. If you have other 486 motherboards with cache chips installed you could try those chips. I don't think it will do any harm, but I won't refund you if it does 😉
Already tried, no luck. 🤣
devius wrote:
mr_bigmouth_502 wrote:I take it the onboard video uses up 1MB?
Onboard video cards in the 486 era were just plain regular video cards soldered to the motherboard, complete with their own RAM chips. AFAIK the concept of shared memory was introduced much later, probably only when AGP boards started appearing. In fact you can see the WDC video chip next to 8 smaller RAM chips near the VGA connector on the first picture.
Anyone know of any Windows 3.1 drivers for these WDC chips?
Also how are they at performances compared to some ISA VGA cards?
Billyray520 wrote:
It's hard to tell from the pic, Did you just add the battery voltage to two pins? That's a lot easier than desoldering it. 😎
Yeah, wires from my double A battery pack run into it. I just have duck tape to help make it look decent.