VOGONS


POD 200Mhz

Topic actions

First post, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

This seems to be a rare processor? I've had my eye out for one for a couple of months and there is only a single option I could find on ebay (around $48). I intend to use it strictly for experimenting/benchmarking, so I'm not motivated to spend very much money on it. Question: does this price seem in line with what this CPU is worth?

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 1 of 14, by Gamecollector

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Well, technically it's P200 MMX with the locked 2.5x or 3x multiplier, the power converter and the built-fan (so it uses +3.3V rails only and works in Socket 5 motherboards).
IIRC there are 4 processors in this "Pentium Overdrive MMX" line, 150/166/180/200 MHz. PODPMT66X200 is the rarest.
And the old "1X multiplier w/o the fan" behavior is still here. 😀

Last edited by Gamecollector on 2016-12-15, 01:19. Edited 1 time in total.

Asus P4P800 SE/Pentium4 3.2E/2 Gb DDR400B,
Radeon HD3850 Agp (Sapphire), Catalyst 14.4 (XpProSp3).
Voodoo2 12 MB SLI, Win2k drivers 1.02.00 (XpProSp3).

Reply 2 of 14, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

Yep, forgot to include the MMX part. 😀 Figures the one I want is the rarest. 🤣.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 3 of 14, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

If you want to save money get a regular P233 MMX, they handle 3.3V just fine as long as you use a heatsink that can handle a K6. You get 33 extra MHz and I even think the motherboard is better off without the hot running little overdrive with its tiny heatsink.

Im pretty sure the extra power the Pentium MMX needs at 3.3V isnt more than the Overdrives VRM loses when transforming 3.3V to 2.8V. When using either an Overdrive or a regular Pentium MMX with an old Socket-5 board be sure you got some airflow in the case.

edit -o

Last edited by Skyscraper on 2016-03-13, 16:58. Edited 1 time in total.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 4 of 14, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Skyscraper wrote:

If you want to save money get a regular P233 MMX, they handle 3.3V just fine as long as you use a heatsink that can handle a K6. You get 33 extra MHz and I even think the motherboard is better off without the hot running little overdrive with its tiny heatsink.

Im pretty sure the extra power the Pentium MMX needs at 3.3V isnt more than the Overdrives VRM looses when transforming 3.3V to 2.8V. When using either an Overdrive or a regular Pentium MMX with an old Socket-5 board be sure you got some airflow in the case.

I'm not sure that would work in my motherboard. It lists cpu support as 75-133Mhz, with special jumper configs for Overdrive processors up to 200Mhz.

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 5 of 14, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
clueless1 wrote:
Skyscraper wrote:

If you want to save money get a regular P233 MMX, they handle 3.3V just fine as long as you use a heatsink that can handle a K6. You get 33 extra MHz and I even think the motherboard is better off without the hot running little overdrive with its tiny heatsink.

Im pretty sure the extra power the Pentium MMX needs at 3.3V isnt more than the Overdrives VRM looses when transforming 3.3V to 2.8V. When using either an Overdrive or a regular Pentium MMX with an old Socket-5 board be sure you got some airflow in the case.

I'm not sure that would work in my motherboard. It lists cpu support as 75-133Mhz, with special jumper configs for Overdrive processors up to 200Mhz.

The Pentium MMX 233 use the same jumper settings as the P100, it should™ work.

If you already have a Pentium MMX 166 or 200 CPU you can always try one of those before buying a 233 MHz model, they should™ all work at 133 MHz with the same jumper settngs as a normal P133.

There is one case when a Pentium MMX is not a good choice and that is when a Socket-5/7 motherboard only support 3.5-3-6V (VRE) and not 3.3-3.4V (STD) as 3.6V is right on the limit of what a Pentium MMX chip can handle (3.7V absolute Vmax according to the spec).

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 6 of 14, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

But do we know if his motherboard supports spilt votage rails necessary for the Pentium MMX, early socket 7 boards did not.

Reply 7 of 14, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
candle_86 wrote:

But do we know if his motherboard supports spilt votage rails necessary for the Pentium MMX, early socket 7 boards did not.

The Pentium MMX do not need split voltage rails to function, it will run on a 3.3V Core/IO "STD" voltage spec just fine, at least on the motherboards I have tried but the "VRE" 3.5V-3.6V voltage spec is a bit too high for me to think its a good idea.

Overvolting do increase the power draw though but I bet a Pentium MMX 233 @ 3.3V still isnt worse than a stock K6 233 MHz (3.2V). Intel did not push the Pentium MMX because they diddnt have to.

If one really wants to play it safe neither a fast Overdrive with its own VRM or overvolting a Pentium MMX CPU is a good idea for an old Socket 5 motherboard. The point is that Im not sure one is worse than the other as I think both will draw about the same amount of power because of the power loss in the Overdrives VRM. What I am sure of is that it's easier to find a good cooling solution for the Pentium MMX that also cools the motherboard area around the CPU.

The Pentium MMX 166 and Pentium MMX 200 do not always support the 1.5x = 3.5x multiplier which can be an issue on old boards with only a single jumper for multipliers (1.5x and 2x).

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 8 of 14, by Gamecollector

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
Skyscraper wrote:

The Pentium MMX do not need split voltage rails to function

Dunno.
IIRC the chip uses the same 296-pin package as classic Pentiums. Minus 11 E pins (E11-E31), minus 13 AJ pins (AJ7-AJ31) and AH32 pin isn't used too so it can be inserted in the Socket5 w/o any trouble.
But use MMX's w/o the correct dual VRM... Not see the point to do this. Overclocking and overvolting is a serious disease. 😀

Asus P4P800 SE/Pentium4 3.2E/2 Gb DDR400B,
Radeon HD3850 Agp (Sapphire), Catalyst 14.4 (XpProSp3).
Voodoo2 12 MB SLI, Win2k drivers 1.02.00 (XpProSp3).

Reply 9 of 14, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The motherboard I'm considering this for has official support for Overdrive processors up to 200Mhz, so I don't anticipate compatibility issues there. I've also read reports of people using a 233MMX and K6-2 with a Powerleap adapter. Here's more info on the motherboard:
http://www.uktsupport.co.uk/pb/mb/570.htm

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 10 of 14, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
Gamecollector wrote:
Dunno. IIRC the chip uses the same 296-pin package as classic Pentiums. Minus 11 E pins (E11-E31), minus 13 AJ pins (AJ7-AJ31) a […]
Show full quote
Skyscraper wrote:

The Pentium MMX do not need split voltage rails to function

Dunno.
IIRC the chip uses the same 296-pin package as classic Pentiums. Minus 11 E pins (E11-E31), minus 13 AJ pins (AJ7-AJ31) and AH32 pin isn't used too so it can be inserted in the Socket5 w/o any trouble.
But use MMX's w/o the correct dual VRM... Not see the point to do this. Overclocking and overvolting is a serious disease. 😀

Some poeple see it that way, Im just saying that isnt isnt sure that a Pentium MMX Overdrive is a better option if one has the wellbeeing of the motherboard in mind. To the motherboard the current drawn is what creates heat and therefor what is dangerous.

For example a 0.18 micron Cyrix MII CPU rated at 2.2V is pushed just as hard as a 0.28 micron Pentium MMX CPU overvolted at 3.3V. Intel never needed to push their CPUs close to the limit as they led the performance race anyhow.

I see both the Overdrives and overvolting of retro CPUs as something one uses/does for benchmarks and tests. For retro rigs used for everyday gaming a motherboard meant for the CPU in question is always better than both overvolted Pentium MMX CPUs and Overdrives on older boards.

clueless1 wrote:

The motherboard I'm considering this for has official support for Overdrive processors up to 200Mhz, so I don't anticipate compatibility issues there. I've also read reports of people using a 233MMX and K6-2 with a Powerleap adapter. Here's more info on the motherboard:
http://www.uktsupport.co.uk/pb/mb/570.htm

At least your motherboard supports both 3.3V (STD) and 3.5V (VRE). 😀

Last edited by Skyscraper on 2016-03-14, 17:07. Edited 1 time in total.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 11 of 14, by candle_86

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

given the age of the MMX chips these days, id avoid over volting them, and use them only within specs, so given that id go with the POD if its supported, there is a reason they offically support the POD and not the MMX and likely the lack of split rail voltage. Just my two cents, but I'd hate for you to find your MMX degraded after a year or two from being over spec to long.

Reply 12 of 14, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
candle_86 wrote:

given the age of the MMX chips these days, id avoid over volting them, and use them only within specs, so given that id go with the POD if its supported, there is a reason they offically support the POD and not the MMX and likely the lack of split rail voltage. Just my two cents, but I'd hate for you to find your MMX degraded after a year or two from being over spec to long.

If one care about the CPU you have a point but a Pentium 233 MMX is dirt cheap while the Overdrives are rare and expensive.

I have never managed to kill or degrade a Pentium MMX (I own 50+) and I have done unspeakable things to them. My worry is always the motherboards.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.

Reply 13 of 14, by clueless1

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

So if I wanted to try a 233MMX, I'd set the voltage jumper to VRE and the multipler jumpers to Pentium 100? I probably won't do it, but I wanted to understand the process. MMX processors require VRE?

The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.
OPL3 FM vs. Roland MT-32 vs. General MIDI DOS Game Comparison
Let's benchmark our systems with cache disabled
DOS PCI Graphics Card Benchmarks

Reply 14 of 14, by Skyscraper

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
clueless1 wrote:

So if I wanted to try a 233MMX, I'd set the voltage jumper to VRE and the multipler jumpers to Pentium 100? I probably won't do it, but I wanted to understand the process. MMX processors require VRE?

I just checked your motherboard manaul again and the voltage settings are only marked VR "Voltage Regulated" and VRE "Voltage Regulated Extension". VR is probably 3.3V and the setting to use but if you have a DMM it would not hurt to measure the voltage to be 100% sure it isnt too high. Any voltage over 3.4V would make me uneasy using a Pentium MMX for anything but some short benchmarks and anything over 3.5V is a no go.

If you ask Intel the VRE "Voltage Regulated Extension" is specified to 3.4V - 3.6V and the STD "Standard" is ~3.3V but can be everything from 3.1V to 3.6V and still be within the specification. When I have measuered with a DMM the "STD" voltage setting has always been very close to 3.3V. I prefer when the voltage settings are marked with the actual voltages as motherboard manufacturers sometimes use abbreviations different from how Intel uses them.

And yes the 1.5x multiplier.

New PC: i9 12900K @5GHz all cores @1.2v. MSI PRO Z690-A. 32GB DDR4 3600 CL14. 3070Ti.
Old PC: Dual Xeon X5690@4.6GHz, EVGA SR-2, 48GB DDR3R@2000MHz, Intel X25-M. GTX 980ti.
Older PC: K6-3+ 400@600MHz, PC-Chips M577, 256MB SDRAM, AWE64, Voodoo Banshee.