Ozzuneoj wrote:
Very interesting! The newer chips were certainly an improvement, but the 5200+ does pretty decently for being basically the same core as the original Athlon 64.
Indeed, Athlon 64 was revolutionary and was aging pretty well.
SW-SSG wrote:I wasn't expecting the 7750BE to be so energy inefficient compared to the others. Ouch. Good article!
I was a little shocked by the numbers. Kuma performance is much better than I though, but power draw is insane for dual core.
BitWrangler wrote:Where it feels like a bigger drop is from the Windsor to the same model/clock in the Brisbane due to the less L2.
I will cover that in the future. There will be article about the three Athlons from previous one + Brisbane + Phenom I + Phenom II. Basicaly every CPU Core working on AM2+ will be tested under Windows 7 with more powerful GPU, 5750 was to weak. The problem is that my website isn't very popular so I'm not so sure if I should invest so much time in that.