VOGONS


First post, by lowlytech

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

I have a 5170 I am trying to outfit with a 2 meg aboveboard AT card. To complicate things, I also have an IBM 128/640 card that is fully populated. The IBM card is configured to start first and after that I want this intel card to top it off so to speak. So 512k on MB, 128K on IBM board Bank1 and 512k on Bank 0. When you throw this 2Meg intel card the memory count does indeed go to 3200K.

Right out the gate I am testing with checkit 3.0 and I get memory errors in the extended memory area. However I am worried because I am not confident in my DIP settings as they don't seem to match up with the only documentation that looks close to what I have.

https://stason.org/TULARC/pc/memory-cards/INT … E-BOARD-AT.html

but either my card is a tad off from these settings or I must not be understanding how the settings work cause only by trial and error I finally got the 5170 POST count to show what was suppose to be there, and my current dip settings do not show up as a valid option on that page.

So my questions boils down to this. Can some unknown DIP setting set incorrectly on the intel card be causing this error?, or is it more than likely bad RAM? Retesting the system with the intel card removed shows no errors at all during the memory test of 1152k, so I know my culprit is something on this intel board.

The only markings on this board is a serial number and a number etched into the pcb of 107037 REV B, 300096-002, other than a small sticker with "Intel" on it, I don't see any official name like aboveboard or a product name at all.

20181222_231829.jpg
Filename
20181222_231829.jpg
File size
374.17 KiB
Views
750 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
20181222_231453.jpg
Filename
20181222_231453.jpg
File size
184.53 KiB
Views
750 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
20181222_231310.jpg
Filename
20181222_231310.jpg
File size
277.36 KiB
Views
750 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
20181222_231244.jpg
Filename
20181222_231244.jpg
File size
271.08 KiB
Views
750 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Reply 2 of 5, by lowlytech

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Sorry about that, didn't think to send a complete pic. Here is the front and back..

20181223_101655.jpg
Filename
20181223_101655.jpg
File size
685.16 KiB
Views
732 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception
20181223_101725.jpg
Filename
20181223_101725.jpg
File size
706.61 KiB
Views
732 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

Thanks for that memory board link, I will look that over.

Thanks again for all the help and input you all provide.

Reply 3 of 5, by lowlytech

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
IMG_1199.JPG
Filename
IMG_1199.JPG
File size
1.28 MiB
Views
667 views
File license
Fair use/fair dealing exception

I ran the extended memory tester instead of CheckIT after fighting what seemed to be endless conflicts with XT-ide and other hardware and here is the results. I am leaning toward a bad ram chip as the culprit. Now to find it..

Reply 5 of 5, by lowlytech

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Yes, I will post my jumper settings in the other thread. I just wanted to confirm it was correct and error free. It took pretty much the whole day to find the bad chip out of 72. I don't understand the logic of the errors and basically had to pull them all and reinstall them a bank at a time until I had no errors. Turns out I had one bad chip, now the memory test ran all night and this morning there are 0 errors in 3200k.