Prez wrote on 2020-07-03, 20:17:Interesting. Why they did have the same name ? :D
Very strange. […]
Show full quote
ragefury32 wrote on 2020-07-03, 19:07:
Prez wrote on 2020-07-02, 18:25:Hi !
I have an Igel 5/2 with an ISA and PCI port, VIA 82T686 southbridge for sound, and a S3 video card (don't remember what exa […]
Show full quote
Hi !
I have an Igel 5/2 with an ISA and PCI port, VIA 82T686 southbridge for sound, and a S3 video card (don't remember what exactly) and it looks great, and works both very well with ISA or PCI cards !
I think its pretty near the same machine ?
Its this one :
https://www.cbo-do.de/Computer/Thin-Clients/I … NEW::32543.html
Best regards
Philippe Dubois
Not really.
The Igel 5-2 is based on the Via C3 with a PM133 chipset (S3 ProSavage integrated GPU). The Igel-J is an older machine but it's AMD K6-2E based (but can accept a K6-3+ up to 570MHz), have 2 full sized PC100/133 SDRAM slots, a built-in power supply, a dual PCI/ISA riser, and have an embedded ESS Solo-1. It's very different from the Via Epia based thin clients out there.
Interesting. Why they did have the same name ? 😁
Very strange.
Best regards
Philippe Dubois
It doesn't have the same name. In fact, it was never called the 5/2 during its lifetime - it's sold either as the 532 Premium/X-Term or the 596 Enteprise/Premium Plus models.
Igel have this annoying tendency to decouple the model name from the actual model which persists to this day ->
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search … n&ct=clnk&gl=us
(Why yes, thank you misconfigured crawler settings. Using google caches to bypass access restrictions to a silly Gartner research report yields useful results)
It's referred to on the hardware labelling as the 5/2 as the only significant difference between the 4 models seem to be software loadouts and differing DIMM/DOM loadouts, and that’s their internal inventory keeping code.
The Igel-J is listd here on evilbay -> https://www.ebay.com/itm/123974369343
It was known by Igel marketing as the Etherminal-J (it’s more like a J+ as the original Etherminal-J is based on the Cyrix/NatSemi MediaGX) but on the label it's the Winnet IV -> https://www.ebay.com/itm/382980919331
Of course, that's not the first time thin clients have other names. That’s mostly due to the lineage of thin client companies changing owners after the 2000s dotcom crash.
For example, the Wyse 8440XL thin client is on offer @ eBay US for $135 -> https://www.ebay.com/itm/253259600768
However, you might be able to buy a Netier NetXpress 2000XL at a less expensive price - its the same machine (Wyse bought out Netier to get into the thin client business) -> https://usermanual.wiki/Wyse-Technology/WT844 … nual-165067.pdf
It's K6-2 based, but uses the same PLE133 chipset as the later Via Epia based thin clients out there. The big plus here is using a K6-2+ or K6-2+ embedded model to get access to Powernow clocking and lower heat generation (K6s tends to perform better than the earlier Via C3s). And yes, it has an old Via southbridge so DOS sound support works natively on the machine, but given how the VIA FM synthesis requires a large chunk of conventional memory and sounds less-than-stellar (I have a Wyse Winterm 9450XE here so I speak from experience), I prefer sticking with the Igel-J...much easier to make DOS behave with the hardware (once you unravel it), and it's easier to add hardware hacks like a Voodoo 2, a slimline laptop optical drive, and a 26 pin FFC Gotek to it - all of which I am doing now.
Of course, it's slightly more hilarious later on when Neoware (now part of HP), Wyse (now part of Dell) and Igel went to the same Chinese ODM to build their thin clients.