VOGONS


First post, by mpe

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I always wondered how entry-level Pentiums 60/66 or 75 compare against some advanced 486 designs like 5x86's. So I've done a benchmark test comparing various 1993-95 CPUs in a number of areas and if the P75 rating of these chips is justified.

DSC_7492-1-scaled.jpeg

In Winstone 95:

Screenshot-2020-06-07-at-10.27.19.png

And in Quake:

Screenshot-2020-06-07-at-10.21.53.png

And more here.

In the graphs above the Socket 5 chips were running on both the original 430NX motherboard as well as later more modern one based on 430FX to give an extra bit of historic context.

Unsurprisingly, the P100/P90 dominate the competition. However, in some areas, the Socket 3 based designs can hold its own even against full-blown Pentiums.

Which CPU from this era is your favourite?

Blog|NexGen 586|S4

Reply 1 of 7, by Marentis

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

My very first computer was a 486Dx with 33 megahertz and 32 mb ram. My next step was a Pentium 90 with 16 MB ram.
The Pentium 90 was a real step up for me (Diablo, Tomb Raider 1/2). So I'd personally vote for the Pentium 90, as it was also my first Windows 95 machine.

Reply 2 of 7, by treeman

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

should do the 5x86 amd clocked to 160 that is rated equivalent to p90, I got 17~ fps in quake on 5x86 @ 160 but with all tight ram timings etc

Reply 3 of 7, by mpe

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

I wanted to keep overclocking out. However, AMD actually produced a rare 5x86 - 150 P75+ version. So perhaps I could include that for completeness and simulate it by overclocking the 133 version as I don't have the chip.

The best I could achieve at 150 Mhz was ~16.4 in Quake. It is even slightly faster than 160 MHz (due to faster bus) which is still not enough to compete with Pentiums.

Blog|NexGen 586|S4

Reply 7 of 7, by treeman

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
mpe wrote on 2020-06-08, 09:31:

I wanted to keep overclocking out. However, AMD actually produced a rare 5x86 - 150 P75+ version. So perhaps I could include that for completeness and simulate it by overclocking the 133 version as I don't have the chip.

The best I could achieve at 150 Mhz was ~16.4 in Quake. It is even slightly faster than 160 MHz (due to faster bus) which is still not enough to compete with Pentiums.

yeah I understand this keep it stock for stock. The 5x86 160 is always half half because it gets detected by many bios as a X5 160 amd which was supposed to be a thing but never made it. However being detected as a X5 160 P90 by the bios might be relevant for some