First post, by Tempest
- Rank
- Member
I have two different monitors available to use with my DOS and Windows XP gaming rigs (a 486, a Pentium 1, and a Pentium 4). I'm currently using a Dell Ultrascan 990 which is a nice 2-" CRT, but it's HUGE and takes up a ton of space on my desk, not to mention it was somewhat 'used and abused' before I got it and has some weak color unless you turn all the RGB settings up to max, then it looks fine (not sure what the long term ramifications are of this though). Surprisingly the geometry on it is really good, but sometimes when I adjust certain settings the whole image 'wobbles' which makes me think it may be on borrowed time. My other monitor choice is an early Dell FP2001 which came with my XPS (the Pentium 4 I mentioned) and has been well cared for over the years.
I was originally using the 2001FP, but when I came across the CRT I figured it would be better for older games, but unless my old eyes are deceiving me, I'm not seeing any difference. Is there a certain game I should throw at it to test it out? I'm mostly playing games from the 92-2005 time period so thats all VGA/SVGA which this monitor handles. I'd like to use the 2001FP if it will work with all games since I could push it back more on my desk. The only issue I have with it is that it does that 'auto adjusting' thing now and then when the resolution changes. I'm not sure how often that will be a factor though and it does display an image while doing this, it's just moving stuff around trying to figure out what to do.
A bit off topic for this group, but I'd also be using it with a Dreamcast and VGA box if that makes any difference.
--- AtariProtos.com ---
For when excellence and burnished fineries need to gently visit the warmth of your tablery