VOGONS


First post, by W.x.

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Why Gigabyte GA-6BXC rev 1.7 has only 40 wire PATA connectors while UDMA-33, but Gigabyte GA-6BXC rev 2.0 has 80 wire PATA connectors (with missing pin) while still being UDMA-33?

https://theretroweb.com/motherboards/s/gigaby … ga-6bxc-rev-1-7
https://theretroweb.com/motherboards/s/gigaby … ga-6bxc-rev-2-0

Is this typical for BX boards, that some of them have only 40 wire compatible IDE connectors, while some of them 80 wire ( while still not UDMA-66)? Why manufacturers did this? And didn't include 80 wire connectors all the time?

I thought 80 wire cables are for UDMA-66 and up, for example I have it this way on Abit BE6 - two UDMA-33 connectors for onboard IDE are with all pins (40-wire cable compatible), but two UDMA-66 connectors are 80 wire compatible. I've considered it logical this way.

https://theretroweb.com/motherboards/s/abit-ab-be6

Backstory: I had HDD prepared with cable after testing Slot 1 motherboard GA-6BXC board (80 wire IDE cables), and switched to QDI BrillianX 1s-2000 for another testing (which is also late 1999 board from same era) and to my suprise IDE cable didn't fit into connector. Then I've realized that board is using old 40 wire cables.
https://theretroweb.com/motherboards/s/qdi-p6 … illianx-1s-2000

Last edited by W.x. on 2024-02-23, 23:08. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 1 of 15, by PcBytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

From what I see, 6BXC rev1.7 also has the missing pin, at least from Robert B's photo.

You can just clear the hole that's missing on the 80pin cables - I usually do that so I don't have to swap cables when moving mainboards. (e.g MSI 694D Pro-AR and DTK PRM27i E0)

"Enter at your own peril, past the bolted door..."
Main PC: i5 3470, GB B75M-D3H, 16GB RAM, 2x1TB
98SE : P3 650, Soyo SY-6BA+IV, 384MB RAM, 80GB

Reply 2 of 15, by ubiq

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
PcBytes wrote on 2024-02-23, 17:32:

You can just clear the hole that's missing on the 80pin cables - I usually do that so I don't have to swap cables when moving mainboards. (e.g MSI 694D Pro-AR and DTK PRM27i E0)

I've never done that - would you be limited to one device on that cable or no?

Reply 3 of 15, by PcBytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Since the pin is technically the only thing mechanically preventing insertion, no. You're basically using the cables as if they were standard 40pin IDE - the pincount remains the same, it's the conductor that differs.

"Enter at your own peril, past the bolted door..."
Main PC: i5 3470, GB B75M-D3H, 16GB RAM, 2x1TB
98SE : P3 650, Soyo SY-6BA+IV, 384MB RAM, 80GB

Reply 4 of 15, by W.x.

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
PcBytes wrote on 2024-02-23, 17:32:

From what I see, 6BXC rev1.7 also has the missing pin, at least from Robert B's photo.

You can just clear the hole that's missing on the 80pin cables - I usually do that so I don't have to swap cables when moving mainboards. (e.g MSI 694D Pro-AR and DTK PRM27i E0)

No, it doesn't have, it's imperfection in photo.
Here's another one, from Tiget Technik
https://www.tiger-technik.de/Mainboards/Intel … m577::3934.html
download/file.php?mode=view&id=186287

Anyway, still not answer for my question 0 why motherboard manufacturers was doing it... Why to place PATA-66 connectors on UDMA33 board, and if it has any benefits, why all of the manufacturers wasn't doing it? Could cause only problems for people, with old 40 wire cables inside case.

Attachments

  • 3934_1.jpg
    Filename
    3934_1.jpg
    File size
    132.23 KiB
    Views
    396 views
    File license
    Fair use/fair dealing exception
Last edited by W.x. on 2024-02-23, 23:08. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 5 of 15, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

You need to worry about it as much as plugging a USB 2.1 extension cable into a USB 1.1 port or a Cat 6 LAN cable into a 10baseT adapter... i.e. not at all.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 6 of 15, by PcBytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
W.x. wrote on 2024-02-23, 19:50:

No, it doesn't have, it's imperfection in photo.

And I found several 1.7s with missing pins, one of them off a eBay listing. I am fairly sure those aren't imperfections, rather a transition to the standard 80pin done during their apparition.

Attachments

"Enter at your own peril, past the bolted door..."
Main PC: i5 3470, GB B75M-D3H, 16GB RAM, 2x1TB
98SE : P3 650, Soyo SY-6BA+IV, 384MB RAM, 80GB

Reply 7 of 15, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

It's not even solely an ATA66 thing, some manufacturers did it back in the late 80s into 90s, it was always a pain the ass.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 8 of 15, by PcBytes

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie
BitWrangler wrote on 2024-02-23, 20:26:

It's not even solely an ATA66 thing, some manufacturers did it back in the late 80s into 90s, it was always a pain the ass.

Even more so as even the old HDDs that first started using IDE (Miniscribe for example) don't use that pin either.

"Enter at your own peril, past the bolted door..."
Main PC: i5 3470, GB B75M-D3H, 16GB RAM, 2x1TB
98SE : P3 650, Soyo SY-6BA+IV, 384MB RAM, 80GB

Reply 9 of 15, by wierd_w

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

The pin being present is known to cause issues on some CF adapters.

However... what I tended to do (but which is very naughty and bad, and you probably shouldnt do it!), was to take a sewing needle or sewing pin, hold it in a pair of needlenose pliers, heat it up with a butane lighter, then press it into the space where a hole SHOULD BE, to MAKE a hole.

This allows the cable to go on just fine.

Usually, it's hollow inside, with just a small rind of plastic, so you dont have to push hard.

But not always.... some were very aggressive and solid plastic in there.

Reply 10 of 15, by BitWrangler

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Some just have a white, or kinda hard to tell black, plug in there that you can just flick out with the point of a sharp craft knife. I also hate the ones that are solid right through, same with some VGA sockets. I have a tiny drill I sometimes use, sometimes use the hot needle method also.

Unicorn herding operations are proceeding, but all the totes of hens teeth and barrels of rocking horse poop give them plenty of hiding spots.

Reply 11 of 15, by W.x.

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

It's ok, I have many 40wire and 80wire IDE cables, I just use 40pin cable... even on ATA-100 Hard-drive. UDMA33 on integrated IDE controller, would still limit it around 20-25MB/sec, so I think 80wire cable wouldn't make any difference. But I've heard, they have better signal transfer than over 40pin.

Last edited by W.x. on 2024-02-23, 23:06. Edited 1 time in total.

Reply 12 of 15, by rasz_pl

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

80 wire, not 80 pin 😀
Makes no difference on UDMA33 board. 80 wire cable gives you extra guard traces between every signal wire https://blog.lamsimenterprises.com/2013/04/12 … races-worth-it/ Required for error free UDMA66-133 transmission.

Open Source AT&T Globalyst/NCR/FIC 486-GAC-2 proprietary Cache Module reproduction

Reply 13 of 15, by dionb

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
W.x. wrote on 2024-02-23, 21:56:

It's ok, I have many 40wire and 80wire IDE cables, I just use 40pin cable... even on ATA-100 Hard-drive. UDMA33 on integrated IDE controller, would still limit it around 20-25MB/sec, so I think 80wire cable wouldn't make any difference. But I've heard, they have better signal transfer than over 40pin.

There are also 80 wire cables with 40 holes and 40 wire cables with 39 holes.

As that pin is N/C or "Not Connected" it doesn't matter at all for functionality, or at least should not - as some CF cards behave weirdly if it is present. I have the luxury of too many cables, so to maximize compatibility I discard cables with connectors without that 40th hole. Makes life a lot easier.

Reply 14 of 15, by Disruptor

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Well, we all care about specifications.
Wait. Wasn't there a maximum cable length of 18 inches (45,7 cm) on PATA? That would be funny if both channels are on one electrical connection, haha.

And a NC pin has to be "not connected".
However, it is well known that several DOMs take usage of +5 V on that key pin.

Basically I use both 40 and 80 wire cables. And both connectors with 39 and 40 holes. If a connector with 39 pins doesn't fit on a motherboard you can either remove one pin on the connector of the motherboard or drill a hole into a connector on the cable. I prefer the latter and drill a hole with one of my smallest screwdrivers.

Reply 15 of 15, by Sphere478

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

I use 80 conductor cables on retro IDE controllers/mobos that predate ata66 all the time. Just take a thumb tac, or a paper clip, heat the pin and push it in the blocker hole on the cable. To make the hole. Then be sure to put it on the correct way. It will function like a 40 conductor cable.

Sphere's PCB projects.
-
Sphere’s socket 5/7 cpu collection.
-
SUCCESSFUL K6-2+ to K6-3+ Full Cache Enable Mod
-
Tyan S1564S to S1564D single to dual processor conversion (also s1563 and s1562)