dominusprog wrote on 2024-03-05, 11:39:
Sure, but in both cases it entirely depends on the usage. I have two WD Black which is configured as Linux RAID zero that according to SMART been on for about 10 years.
I'm glad your drives are holding up. My mirrored drives have only been on for 8 years. Yes, they are magnetic because that was the most cost effective choice at the time. Doesn't change the fact that SSD's have a higher MTBF and there's a reason why I wanted more than 1 mechanical drive to hold the data.
I think we both agree that regardless of the storage media, SSD or magnetic, if you put the drives in a data center usage pattern, you should expect a shorter life but let's talk about desktop usage. Can we agree that it's for a rare desktop hard drives to do more that 5 TB of writes a year? The actual number is well under 1TB, but let's say 5TB for the sake of argument, it case you are a power user.
These guys did a torture test a few years back. https://techreport.com/review/the-ssd-enduran … king-petabytes/ They didn't get any SSD failures until after 600TB of writes, and the best made it over 2Petabytes of writes.
If your hard drive does 5 TB of writes a year, it's not unreasonable to expect your flash to last for 100 years of writes if treated well. Something else is likely to fail before the flash endurance runs out. And who here expects a mechanical drive to last 100 years?
So just because the builder was able to predict how long flash will last, it doesn't mean it's going to have a shorter life.