Homer J wrote:
Well well. A kindergarten-level flaming...
The guy who deliberately started a flame-thread and insulted the vast majority of the board is calling me immature.
..and from a moderator, no less. What a surprise.
Classic "I can flame all I want, you can't flame back" response.
Since most of your idiotic novella was just one juvenile insult after another,...
Each and every one earned and well deserved.
I won't waste time reliving my grade-school flame wars with the likes of someone this immature.
Again, the guy who made a baseless, broad-sweeping insult for every single person who says it works for them is calling me immature and pretending to be above flaming. Pitiful.
What I will say is, your implication is that I didn't try enough?
No, what I'm saying is that you testing less than .001% of DOS titles out there is not even close to having a basis for saying this:
I mean nothing works with it!
If you're going to use hyperbole, you better be prepared to have a real basis for it.
5 Games, and that's not enough to be conclusive?
Finally, you grasp the concept. Correct, it's NOT enough to be conclusive.
Try this on for size:
I found 5 titles that don't work with Windows 98, it's useless!
I found 5 titles that don't work with Windows 2000, it's useless!
I found 5 titles that don't work with Windows XP, it's useless!
I found 5 titles that don't work with Mandrake Linux, it's useless!
Do you see how ridiculous that sounds?
You expect a user to actually go hunting down obsolete demos to top it off, instead of using their own products,...
Again. Pay attention and READ. You had said:
One more attempt (and frankly this is a stretch because I don't own that many DOS games anymore...
, as if you were putting great effort into finding something else to test because it
When you had thousands of others to test with the most basic of searches. You said you were testing others to see if Realms was the exception and not the rule. Remember? It was hardly a massive effort on your part.
...but of course, we're meant to be testing this thing for you, I guess, not actually using it. Thanks for confirming.
No. Smarmy remarks like this don't work when you don't even comprehend what I wrote.
Your excuse about things being "late DOS" and "heavy on resources" and "NT OS issue" and whatever else...
It's not an excuse. It's called accurate data.
Again, you act as if you have some form of omniscience that allows you to read everyone's minds. Nobody else has come forth with this "it didn't work for me so obviously it's a hoax" nonsense. They've shown courtesy and asked questions. They didn't start flame-threads.
That's exactly what an emulator/translator/whatever is supposed to work around.
Get it through your thick skull, it's an AUDIO emulator, NOT a PC emulator. It won't work with programs that the OS refuses to run IN THE FIRST PLACE. It won't do it for the same reason that replacing your stereo won't fix your TV screen.
Suggesting things like running off DOS itself is as f*cking stupid as you can possibly get,...
No. Again this is called logic, IOW meeting the original, specified requirements. People can set up a dual-boot, or simply set up a FAT/FAT32 drive and access with a boot disk (floppy). I guess you never heard of these.
[B]I mean you don't think that's what we've been doing the whole time?
No, that's NOT what you've been doing. THERE IS NO DOS IN XP or any other NT OS. He's referring to actual DOS or the Win9x series of OS's based on DOS.
The fact that you don't realize this is a good example of you not knowing what you're talking about.
[B]Lack of response generally means that no one knows a solution.
Wow. A reasonable thought. Let me savor the moment.
[B]In my case, it was an extremely easy thing to troubleshoot for experienced users...
And now, the moment has passed. Again, if we don't have the game ourselves it's far from easy. It's the equivalent of calling a car mechanic on the phone and trying to repair your car over the phone instead of bringing it to the garage.
[B]basically either I was doing something wrong or overlooking a setting, or the CD detection isn't working.
No response probably means it's the latter,
Actually you did get a response, just not an answer. In any case it's almost certainly the OS not detecting the CD. We needed you to test without any audio enabled to confirm this. You never replied to that.
...which means for something this basic, VDM's vaunted abilities already start looking like bullsh*t.
Actually, Vlad hasn't "hyped" his program, he's quite understated compared to numerous shareware authors out there and he's extremely courteous. Any hype has come from satisfied users. The ones you claim are delusional. Your lack of knowledge about the subject is source of the feces here.
You have the gall to mention "thousands" of games working.
Actually no, what I said was this...
Wow! THREE whole games out of thousands. IOW, Out of thousands of games available you found a few that didn't work on your PC and irrationally jumped to conclusion that
What I said is pretty obvious if you actually think while you read.
The compatibility list I saw didn't look too long at all, and I'd love to see where you get this kind of delusion.
When it works, people have a tendency to just go ahead and play and not bother with submitting a compatibility update.
Anyway, you and "everyone" else here are free to have your little bubbles of reality.
More condescension from the guy who doesn’t even understand what he's running. I just tested "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego v2.2" in XP. Under XP, it fails to detect the native emulation and uses the PC speaker instead. Using VDMSound it works fine playing digital audio and MIDI music using XP's GS-Wavetable. Apparently my "reality bubble" has a higher compatibility rate.
Perhaps your "reality bubble" needs a patch for it's various logic bugs.
[B]The bottom line is, its success rate is so low that it's practically useless, and no one is actually using it...
Based on your pitiful excuse for logic.
[B]...aside from a handful of vocal sheep,...
I thought you were going to be "mature" about this?
[B]...and even then, their actual "use" of it is probably all hype and wouldn't withstand the simplest scrutiny.
Again, you play the part of the clairvoyant. Claiming to know that which you can't possibly know.
...I'm out of here and long overdue.
Sure hope so.
You succeeded in scamming one more tester for a couple of weeks,...
Yet another victim in our conspiracy to waste other people's time. You really need mood music to play the part of victim here. Perhaps a sad violin solo.
...just like plenty of others before me I'm sure,...
Again with the clairvoyance, you must make a killing on the stock market with your mystic powers.
You all could use learning more than a thing or two from successful collaborative development efforts like MAME or Linux.
Downright funny as Vlad has actually worked with MAME developers. This is what arrogant assumption does for you. The people you praise have exchanged code with Vlad, and here you are telling him how he needs be like them.
I will say that I have made one mistake. I shouldn't have flamed back. I should have purged this thread and then submitted a ban request to the Admin.