ADDiCT wrote:HOTU is a difficult case indeed. On one hand, it's an Abandonware site, and thus "off limits". On the other hand, i agree with KAN that there's a lot of interesting information on HOTU. But i wouldn't call the text info "reviews" - they are more like descriptions (very in-depth), not the typical reviews with a rating at the end. For anyone interested in very old DOS games, HOTU can be a great source of information. That site can't be easily classified as "good" or "evil". Anyway, it's silly to link to the site in VOGONS posts, as a) the VOGONS stance on Abandonware is more than clear, and b) anyone with half a brain can find the info easily via Google.
Well the reason I posted a link to HOTU on the first place is because Air Force Commander is quite an obscure game and I couldn't find any other site that describes it better. Nobody complained at that time, so I thought HOTU is okay until Snover deleted my link.
Nonetheless, we agree on the same thing: good information source of old games (especially reviews) is quite scarce.
While we're at it, I disagree with HOTU's lukewarm review on AFC; I found the game is quite nice, although short. Yes, more complex scenarios are quite overwhelming (try playing the US side in Desert Storm and you know what I mean), but short scenarios (like UAE vs Kuwait) are easy to get into and provide exciting distraction after long hours of work.
ADDiCT wrote:Btw, wd: automatic scanning of posts? Thought control? An automatic big brother that watches us? Either that's a joke, or a bit of an overreaction IMO.
I think they only scan the posted links, which is quite okay by me. I think it's pretty hard to automatically discern the context of the conversation (unless you don't mind false postives) --doesn't it need fuzzy logic of some sort to do so? Because library alone is hardly sufficient to determine the context of the post.
Never thought this thread would be that long, but now, for something different.....
Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman.