VOGONS

Common searches


First post, by gidierre

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

after NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) friday returned its first direct images ever of the Apollo 11 to 17 (13 missing 😜 ) moon landing sites:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multime … pollosites.html

OK, that Capricorn was just a movie, and an entertaining one
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capricorn_One

but I'm referring to all the conspiracy nonsense:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_...iracy_theories

what's left to invent now to keep the hoax legend alive against all evidence? 😎

Last edited by gidierre on 2009-07-20, 21:29. Edited 1 time in total.

We often forgive those who bore us, but we cannot forgive those whom we bore. (La Rochefoucauld)

Reply 2 of 6, by gidierre

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

that's very likely 🙄
so it's never gonna end 😉

EDIT
TBH like the also neverending (pseudo)mystery of the most absurd conspiracy theories on JFK's assassination, not a single one founded on reality,
there's a human factor behind this halfwitted paranoid conspirational mindset,
namely the same eternal tendency by all governments to mystify their subjects.

We often forgive those who bore us, but we cannot forgive those whom we bore. (La Rochefoucauld)

Reply 4 of 6, by gidierre

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
WolverineDK wrote:

I am one of those people who doubt the whole bollocks about the first man on the moon, because of too many factors.

you serious 😕

a fabrication never made any sense imho
why "on earth" wouldn't the USSR belie the whole darn business and uncover the cheating at once if it only could?

don't LRO findings demonstrate anything to you?

We often forgive those who bore us, but we cannot forgive those whom we bore. (La Rochefoucauld)

Reply 5 of 6, by WolverineDK

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

gidierre: yes I am serious. Cause as I said before there are TOO many flaws in all the images ("taken on the moon") and the whole journey. And I am not interested in picking you down from the pedestal. And USSR has nothing to do with why I am doubting the whole bullshit case about the first man on the moon. USSR looked at the film and knew it was fake, and and a load of other stuff. But as I said I am not interested in picking you down from the pedestal. Second of all, Denmark was NOT a part of the eastern block, Denmark has been a member of NATO and UN since almost from the beginning and now a days NATO has a Danish asshole as the top cheese, who is our former Bush arse kissing Prime Minister.

Reply 6 of 6, by Silent Loon

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Beware WolverineDK! Those american astronauts are easily offended:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU

Actually this happened allready some years ago (I think in L.A. 2002). The "interviewer" (what was his name? Bart Sibrel?) a filmmaker and notorious moon hoax believer, wanted Aldrin to swear on a bible that he really did walk on the moon.
But if you want, you can take this as another "proof" (because Aldrin obviously refused to swear).
As far as I've heard Sibrel believed (or stil believes) that in the 60's U.S. technology was behind that of the USSR and that they were not able to send a man on the moon.

Well THIS can be easily checked by everyone in this forum,you just have to play this classic again:

http://www.thelegacy.de/Museum/3876/

My advice to the testers is NOT to use dosbox, but the original hardware (Tandy/IBM 386,16Mhz, 4MB RAM, VGA card, Adlib, SBpro /16 or Mt-32) so no one could say you've faked it, using your superduper 2009 quadcore machine. 😉