
sorry for the crappy quality (phone-camera)
keropi wrote:^ awesome! can you test a GAL?
bristlehog wrote:SB 2.0 supports 44.1 Khz sample rate instead of 22.05 Khz for 1.0/1.5. Not sure if any games of corresponding period have 44 Khz samples though.
BTW, are we sure that it's the DSP or bus controller chip? Some of the species have the big YM3812 chip, others have compact YM3812-F. Could it not be the difference between working and failing GAL?
bristlehog wrote:BTW, are we sure that it's the DSP or bus controller chip?
Stefan_L wrote:What was the actual label on the GAL that was dumped?
And when you ordered the saa1099 chips from Creative did they wanted the "rev" info at all?
Great Hierophant wrote:I wonder if the marked rev 2, rev 3, then the marked rev 4 are the earliest boards, and the unmarked revs with the six digit number on the bottom are the later cards.
bristlehog wrote:I've noticed that the problematic 'Rev6' card mentioned by Cloudschatze is actually built over an older 1991 PCB...
Cloudschatze wrote:When do you anticipate being able to test your cards?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests