Dominus wrote:whenever I read stuff like this I am reminded that humanity is bound to kill itself of. Why this hatred for a sub culture which […]
Show full quote
whenever I read stuff like this I am reminded that humanity is bound to kill itself of. Why this hatred for a sub culture which is gonna be irrelevant in a couple of years?
It's easy to make hipster jokes, I've done them myself, but this hatred even if it is playful hatred? I don't understand this.
Some little insight at http://www.vice.com/read/hw-we-asked-an-exper … te-hipsters-501 butI still find this hipster bashing not funny anymore. Instead I feel ashamed of myself for doing hipster jokes and deeply ashamed of people I encounter that are wishing evil things upon hipsters.
SHAME!
I don't hate hipsters in particular; I just don't understand --and rather frown upon-- superficial subcultures. I mean, what is the difference between a goth and a chav, if not looks and looks alone? And why do punks have to wear cumbersome and uncomfortable chains and safety pins and spikes and studs? IMO, the latest subcultures that actually did anything substantial were the black sub culture (Malcolm X, Nation of Islam, etc) and the hippies --at least they did the real thing and they tried to change something. Now, they gained my respect.
Goths and emos and chavs, on the other hand... what's the point? What do they believe? What are they trying to change? The way I see it, they're just a bunch of pimpled teenagers hanging on malls trying to look different.
I even hesitate identifying myself as a part of less-superficial subcultures. Yes, I comfortably call myself a gamer, but I'm rather uncomfortable to identify myself as part of gamer sub-culture. Even before Gamergate scandal, I've been more at home in gaming enthusiast communities (Vogons, TechReport, Quest Studios, Sierra Music Central) than gaming subculture communities (Reddit, 4chan, 8chan). I mean, yes, Depression Quest is probably overrated (I mean come on, games should be fun instead of depressing, shouldn't they?), and Zoë Quinn is probably a real b**ch, but shouldn't we gamers be discussing Depression Quest on its own merit, instead of making ad hominem attacks against the designer? Are we gamers or Infotainment audiences? Aren't we supposed to talk about the latest nVidia GPU, or the best way to beat Civilization IV, instead of doxing some obscure game designer named Zoë Quinn? Who the hell is this 'Zoë Quinn' person anyway? I recognize (and respect) names like Chris Crawford, Sid Meier, Warren Spector, and Lori-Ann Cole, but if it wasn't for Gamergate, I would never heard about Zoë Quinn at all.
Well, but maybe that's the negative side effects of games becoming mainstream. I remember, when I was in highschool, some of my friends were avid gamers. Internet online walkthrough wasn't common that day, so we have to help each other to finish games like Ultima VI, Quest for Glory I (named Hero's Quest back then), and Star Control II. Heck, I remember one of our "gang members" diligently mapped Ultima V dungeons on checkered exercise book, and we enthusiastically photocopied the maps after he finished. But otherwise, we were normal people. We didn't wear itchy scarfs or trenchcoat during summer, or black lipsticks and other ridiculous things. "Gaming" subculture, on the other hand, seems to be a bunch of pimpled suburban teenagers who got depressed for no reason at all, desperately need to get laid, spending more time gossiping on 4chan instead of actually discussing games and/or gaming hardware on TechReport, all while believing themselves to be "hardcore gamers".
And that's probably why I frown upon most subcultures today.