First post, by chris2021
When did search engines adopt utterly maniacal and blithering idiotic algorithms. A for instance, I live in Waretown, NJ. Afaik there are no other like named towns in the whole of the united states. Which is good because it's an idiotic sounding name ... maybe that's the problem. No, I see this type of pattern all the time. So I'm looking for some.information that pertains to WARETOWN NEW JERSEY. Not 3 pages down, not that it would at that point be justified, but by the 7th item, page 1, I see an item pertaining to WATERTOWN MASSACHUSETTS. Now what could be the actual possibility that could be what I'm looking for? Zero? Absolute zero to be precise.
Ok. I'm asking a question here. Could someone tell me how on earth this could make any sense.
I'll ask again, as I'm that desperate for an answer. How can this make sense? What could be the incentive for them to throw bullshit my way, when the actual probability that what they're sending has absolute.zero significance?
Ok duck duck go, to whatever degree you allegedly protect my privacy, you're still a bunch of idiots. You're wasting my time. To diverge slightly from the specified search terms, AT SOME POINT, perhaps could have.merit. But ... all that needs be said is, you're a waste of time.
I'm all ears for alternatives. I'm not playing anymore. Wouldn't it be totally possible for a collaborative system based on some peer to peer protocol to supplant all this outdated nonsense? I mean there was.gopher back in the day. Someone needs to develop an alternative.