VOGONS


Retro OSes for retro computers

Topic actions

Reply 200 of 209, by cyberluke

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

Nice, but does any of these have Win95 app compatibility or MS-DOS games compatibility? Second question: Would you use any of these to provide some exclusive features not available in Win95, for example? Is there some gain or advantage in terms of software/hardware features for 486 or first Pentium?

Reply 201 of 209, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
cyberluke wrote on 2021-06-01, 10:13:

Nice, but does any of these have Win95 app compatibility or MS-DOS games compatibility? Second question: Would you use any of these to provide some exclusive features not available in Win95, for example? Is there some gain or advantage in terms of software/hardware features for 486 or first Pentium?

Who really cares? Some of these OSs a capable of doing for more than Dos or win9x could ever do..

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 202 of 209, by cyberluke

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member
Caluser2000 wrote on 2021-06-01, 11:56:
cyberluke wrote on 2021-06-01, 10:13:

Nice, but does any of these have Win95 app compatibility or MS-DOS games compatibility? Second question: Would you use any of these to provide some exclusive features not available in Win95, for example? Is there some gain or advantage in terms of software/hardware features for 486 or first Pentium?

Who really cares? Some of these OSs a capable of doing for more than Dos or win9x could ever do..

Yes, that was your time to mention at least one capability 😁

Reply 203 of 209, by megatron-uk

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Which OS's? Any of the unix ones have the main advantage that they are designed from the ground up as 32bit protected mode (of course that excludes some of the 16bit unix variants, such as Microsoft's own Xenix for the then-new 286), free of all the baggage of segmentation, memory management and all that other Dos/Win16/Win32 crud. Want to do scientific computing? Unix is where it is at (and where it always has been).

You can pretty much take something targeted at ANSI C and Posix, lift it, drop it on a modern Linux or BSD, recompile and it will more than likely run. Until you start targetting hardware and/or GUI libraries, the history and (relatively!) sane C library standardisation means that code can often be lifted from one platform and run with little to no modification on another; from Linux/x86 to Solaris/Sparc, for example.

All of them have more development tools than you can shake a stick at, as well as proper network interoperability with features like NFS and LDAP.

Of course if you want cross-compatibility with Dos or Windows 98, then you're not going to find it.

My collection database and technical wiki:
https://www.target-earth.net

Reply 204 of 209, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t
cyberluke wrote on 2021-06-01, 12:02:
Caluser2000 wrote on 2021-06-01, 11:56:
cyberluke wrote on 2021-06-01, 10:13:

Nice, but does any of these have Win95 app compatibility or MS-DOS games compatibility? Second question: Would you use any of these to provide some exclusive features not available in Win95, for example? Is there some gain or advantage in terms of software/hardware features for 486 or first Pentium?

Who really cares? Some of these OSs a capable of doing for more than Dos or win9x could ever do..

Yes, that was your time to mention at least one capability 😁

It wasn't a question worth answering really. 😉 This threat is for all OSs not just Micro$ofts offerings.

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 205 of 209, by Jo22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
cyberluke wrote on 2021-06-01, 10:13:

Nice, but does any of these have Win95 app compatibility or MS-DOS games compatibility? Second question: Would you use any of these to provide some exclusive features not available in Win95, for example? Is there some gain or advantage in terms of software/hardware features for 486 or first Pentium?

These OSes are just for hobbyists purposes, I think.
They are fun to tinker with, but serve no real purpose anymore.
Okay, strictly speaking, they are so incredible old that their built-in network software is useful again.
To browse archived pages at archive.org, for example.
Newer www browsers have their issues with certain mid-90s websites,
so they can't be browsed in their raw form anymore (ie, without archive.org doing some conversion for modern browsers).
Some of these OSes, like old MenuetOS (32-Bit) or KolibriOS are able to run DOSBox, though.
So long story short, these OSes are totally niche and nerdy.
But in a good way. It's a stress relief to work with them at times.
And they likely are not in danger in getting any malware. 😉

"Time, it seems, doesn't flow. For some it's fast, for some it's slow.
In what to one race is no time at all, another race can rise and fall..." - The Minstrel

//My video channel//

Reply 206 of 209, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

I consider the aspect of learning some thing new and different priority. It's good for the grey matter.

Like solving a jigsaw puzzle.

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉

Reply 207 of 209, by appiah4

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Sometimes it's just a matter of re-living a past experience. For OS/2 Warp and late 90s early 2000s Linux, that is the case for me.

Retronautics: A digital gallery of my retro computers, hardware and projects.

Reply 208 of 209, by HangarAte2nds!

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie
appiah4 wrote on 2021-06-02, 08:03:

Sometimes it's just a matter of re-living a past experience. For OS/2 Warp and late 90s early 2000s Linux, that is the case for me.

I tried OS/2 Warp 4 when it was released. My thoughts were pretty meh. But I just found something called ArcaOS which is OS/2 Warp based that will run on a Pentium pro or K6. I am thinking about trying it on some vintage hardware, PMMX, K6-II, PIII and early P4. It is compatible with DOS and Windows 3.1 natively. It also has support for modern hardware and networking. RAM requirements might be tricky for the lowest spec CPUs on which it can run because it needs 512MB. I have a SS7 board which can take 768MB. However there is a MicronICS W6-LI dual Pentium Pro board on eBay right now for around $300 which can take a maximum of 512MB. There's something for me to aspire to - a dual Pentium Pro system. Would only cost me about a grand to build 🤣 For some reason, I don't think twice about spending that much on a modern build but somehow it seems extravagant for a retro gaming PC and not as useful as a P200MMX, though if I ever get rich, I might build a PII Overdrive rig.

Reply 209 of 209, by Caluser2000

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

32-bit Debian 11 installed fine on my Celery 800, 256meg of ram equipped NEC PowerMate in low memory mode no problems at all. One reboot.

Edit: Forgot the link sorry https://www.reddit.com/r/debian/comments/pthv … ne_debian_crew/

There's a glitch in the matrix.
A founding member of the 286 appreciation society.
Apparently 32-bit is dead and nobody likes P4s.
Of course, as always, I'm open to correction...😉