Hi,

I tried all day to get this to run on my pc but no luck.

It opens and runs when I reset NVControl Panel to defaults on NV Inspector but I only get a score of 0 (ZERO) on 3d Results. I only need to run the 2 3D test but always get 0 score.

- Asus Z790 + 13900KS + 3080 (tried 3090 and 4090) same issues.
- Windows 7 x64

I know its possible to run because I see several results using the same platform and OS.

Any help is much appreciated.
Thx

Hello!
If it runs, then in principle you have applied all patches, one is missing, which is why it shows 0FPS. 3DMark99-NOTSC-fix.zip, mkarcher's program, try to run it with this.
download/file.php?id=156769

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 11:12:

Jor3lBR wrote on 2024-02-18, 22:59:

Hi, […]
Show full quote

Hi,

I tried all day to get this to run on my pc but no luck.

It opens and runs when I reset NVControl Panel to defaults on NV Inspector but I only get a score of 0 (ZERO) on 3d Results. I only need to run the 2 3D test but always get 0 score.

- Asus Z790 + 13900KS + 3080 (tried 3090 and 4090) same issues.
- Windows 7 x64

I know its possible to run because I see several results using the same platform and OS.

Any help is much appreciated.
Thx

Hello!
If it runs, then in principle you have applied all patches, one is missing, which is why it shows 0FPS. 3DMark99-NOTSC-fix.zip, mkarcher's program, try to run it with this.
download/file.php?id=156769
[/quote]

This patch worked! Many thx my friend!!!!

Jor3lBR
This patch worked! Many thx my friend!!!!

I'm glad it worked out!

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 11:12:

Jor3lBR wrote on 2024-02-18, 22:59:

Hello!
If it runs, then in principle you have applied all patches, one is missing, which is why it shows 0FPS. 3DMark99-NOTSC-fix.zip, mkarcher's program, try to run it with this.
download/file.php?id=156769

One more question @DarthSun

I can run 3dMark2000 but it always errors on any Adventure (Game2) tests (attached):

- JPEG Error:
"Corrupt JPEG data: premature end of data segment" and a few "50 extraneous bytes before marker 0xd7".

Only on Game 2, Game 1 tests run fine and FPS is fine unlocked.

Do you have a fix for this too?

@Jor3lBR
Do you have a fix for this too?

I haven't come across this error yet, but I uploaded all the 3DMark2000 patches to GDriver, in case someone has a solution...
3DMark2000_allfix

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 18:40:

@Jor3lBR
Do you have a fix for this too?

I haven't come across this error yet, but I uploaded all the 3DMark2000 patches to GDriver, in case someone has a solution...
3DMark2000_allfix

I updated the upload because it didn't have all the patches.

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 19:38:

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 18:40:

@Jor3lBR
Do you have a fix for this too?

I haven't come across this error yet, but I uploaded all the 3DMark2000 patches to GDriver, in case someone has a solution...
3DMark2000_allfix

I updated the upload because it didn't have all the patches.

Thanks, I tried all patches but looks like non-related to patches. I uped a small video so you can see:

https://youtube.com/shorts/PxXqeUWkOHw

Some how I believe it's related to this:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/12140/discussi … 919737479023003

But the solutions there are for Ryzen cpu and I tried applying here but no good.

Jor3lBR wrote on 2024-02-20, 00:46:

Thanks, I tried all patches but looks like non-related to patches. I uped a small video so you can see: […]
Show full quote

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 19:38:

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 18:40:

I haven't come across this error yet, but I uploaded all the 3DMark2000 patches to GDriver, in case someone has a solution...
3DMark2000_allfix

I updated the upload because it didn't have all the patches.

Thanks, I tried all patches but looks like non-related to patches. I uped a small video so you can see:

https://youtube.com/shorts/PxXqeUWkOHw

Some how I believe it's related to this:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/12140/discussi … 919737479023003

But the solutions there are for Ryzen cpu and I tried applying here but no good.

I have a Haswell Xeon configuration from Intel, it runs on it. Two of RyZen, ok on those too. The R3800X+GTX1650 is still relatively modern. There is a picture of this. I ran it under Win11.

Unfortunately, I do not know the cause of the jpeg error, it seems that it can (also) occur on modern Intel machines.

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-20, 02:26:

I have a Haswell Xeon configuration from Intel, it runs on it. Two of RyZen, ok on those too. The R3800X+GTX1650 is still relati […]
Show full quote

Jor3lBR wrote on 2024-02-20, 00:46:

Thanks, I tried all patches but looks like non-related to patches. I uped a small video so you can see: […]
Show full quote

DarthSun wrote on 2024-02-19, 19:38:

I updated the upload because it didn't have all the patches.

Thanks, I tried all patches but looks like non-related to patches. I uped a small video so you can see:

https://youtube.com/shorts/PxXqeUWkOHw

Some how I believe it's related to this:

https://steamcommunity.com/app/12140/discussi … 919737479023003

But the solutions there are for Ryzen cpu and I tried applying here but no good.

I have a Haswell Xeon configuration from Intel, it runs on it. Two of RyZen, ok on those too. The R3800X+GTX1650 is still relatively modern. There is a picture of this. I ran it under Win11.
3800x_gtx1650_w11_4500_3dm2000.jpg

Unfortunately, I do not know the cause of the jpeg error, it seems that it can (also) occur on modern Intel machines.

Oh wow nice! I haven’t tried Win 10 or 11 with it yet, I will give it a go tomorrow. So I use the Win10-11 fix file from you zip archive?

Oh wow nice! I haven’t tried Win 10 or 11 with it yet, I will give it a go tomorrow. So I use the Win10-11 fix file from you zip archive?

I remember yes, but I'll check that exactly. Try it, if it doesn't work, I'll upload my working installed 3DM2000 library to the cloud. Tomorrow, because now the RyZen is still out on the test bench in the workshop.

Hi!
I am new to this comunity and a long time hardware enthusiast with a limited budget. The following days I will share the results I got on the following test system with the video cards at hand (AGP and PCI), and v-sync forced off in the driver. First one the Sapphire Ati Radeon 7000 64MB:

The following test has been performed with the NVIDIA TNT2 M64 16MB PCI, which in this case I really like the PCB. 😀

The following are the test results for a Leadtek Winfast Geforce 2 MX 32MB 128bit AGP on 3dMark99. Same setup as before. 😀

I thought this card was going to get better results than the TNT2 M64 16MB 64bit PCI. Maybe the chosen driver was not the best for this test.

Now it's the turn for the PCI "SiS 305 True Color Graphics and Video Accelerator" 32MB as stated on the first screen once the computer is turned on, which I find very nostalgic for some reason. 😀
Here are the results for the 3dMark99 test with the same setup as before.

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98)
48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98)
Radeon X800
Windows 98
No OC, default benchmark

mln wrote on 2024-04-29, 15:29:

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98) 48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98) Radeon X800 Windows 98 No OC, default benchmark […]
Show full quote

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98)
48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98)
Radeon X800
Windows 98
No OC, default benchmark

Wow, thats super fast! Which driver version are you using for the Radeon X800 in Windows 98? I have a X550 PCIE and would like to try it out 😀

AntonPC wrote on 2024-04-29, 19:17:

mln wrote on 2024-04-29, 15:29:

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98) 48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98) Radeon X800 Windows 98 No OC, default benchmark […]
Show full quote

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98)
48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98)
Radeon X800
Windows 98
No OC, default benchmark

Wow, thats super fast! Which driver version are you using for the Radeon X800 in Windows 98? I have a X550 PCIE and would like to try it out 😀

Thank you 😀. I am using Catalyst 6.2.
The same build with X550 gets:

mln wrote on 2024-04-30, 15:14:

AntonPC wrote on 2024-04-29, 19:17:

mln wrote on 2024-04-29, 15:29:

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98) 48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98) Radeon X800 Windows 98 No OC, default benchmark […]
Show full quote

Xeon X5675 3.07 GHz (1 core used by Win98)
48GB DDR3 RAM (512 MB used by Win98)
Radeon X800
Windows 98
No OC, default benchmark

Wow, thats super fast! Which driver version are you using for the Radeon X800 in Windows 98? I have a X550 PCIE and would like to try it out 😀

Thank you 😀. I am using Catalyst 6.2.
The same build with X550 gets:

That looks pretty good for 1024x768 Windows 98 gaming! Might be on the level of a Radeon 9600. Thanks for the info!

My 3DMark99 scores using default settings, running all tests:

Gateway 2000 GP6-400 w/ Pentium II 400/384MB/Rage 128GL 16MB/98SE
-> 3,111 and CPU score 3,816

Dell Dimension XPS T700R w/ Pentium III 700 slot 1/384MB/Rage 128 Pro 16MB/ME
-> 5,626 and CPU score 10,629

Dell Dimension XPS B866 w/ Pentium III 1GHz socket 370/384MB RDRAM/GeForce 2 MX400 32MB/98SE
-> w/866MHz CPU I got 6,306 and CPU score 12,829
-> w/1GHz CPU I got 6,635 and CPU score 14,602

I still need to run the benchmark on my 5 Win XP and 1 Vista systems and will post those scores when I get them!