Reply 40 of 86, by dexvx
Should organize the data like in the Q3/Doom threads. Kinda hard to go through all this data!
Should organize the data like in the Q3/Doom threads. Kinda hard to go through all this data!
Intel Celeron Northwood @ 3357mhz, HD3850 AGP@810-954
Atari 2600, TI994a, Vic20, c64, ZX Spectrum 128, Amstrad CPC464, Atari 65XE, Commodore Plus/4, Amiga 500
PC's from XT 8088, 486, Pentium MMX, K6, Athlon, P3, P4, 775, to current Ryzen 5600x.
System: Dell OptiPlex 745 Desktop
OS: Windows XP x64 SP2
CPU: Intel Xeon 3070
Memory: 8GB (4 X 2GB) DDR2-800 CL6 SDRAM
GPU: AMD HD7750 1GB 128-Bit GDDR5
ASUS X553MA laptop (2014!) - absolutely terrible! What is this comparable to? A potato? I think it's still better than an FX5200.
System: ASRock 4CoreDual-SATA2
OS: Windows Embedded 8.1 Industry Pro x86
CPU: Intel Xeon X3230
Memory: 4GB (2 X 2GB) DDR2-667 @ 533 CL4 SDRAM
GPU: ATI Radeon HD3850 512MB 256-Bit GDDR3
Benchmark all the things!! (that probably shouldn't be benchmarked!)
ASUS EEE PC netbook from... 2008 maybe?
(The screen is 1024*600, so the bottom bar gets cut off... you can scroll up and down in any full screen application that is *768 🤣 )
Linx 1010B Tablet / netbook thing from 2015
What is more impressive is that the tablet doesn't have a fan or anything, and is charged up by a standard 2amp usb adapter thing. The netbook has a proper fan and power brick and everything...
And here is my main Desktop...
When I saw the previous post, I just wanted to see how much bottleneck the cpu would be while having the same cpu and faster graphics card. So I ran the 3dmark03 with my main desktop pc as well to see the difference.
wrote:When I saw the previous post, I just wanted to see how much bottleneck the cpu would be while having the same cpu and faster graphics card. So I ran the 3dmark03 with my main desktop pc as well to see the difference.
Good to know my cpu is not holding my back then*! And that's at stock speeds
*in a 15 year old synthetic benchmark
wrote:wrote:When I saw the previous post, I just wanted to see how much bottleneck the cpu would be while having the same cpu and faster graphics card. So I ran the 3dmark03 with my main desktop pc as well to see the difference.
Good to know my cpu is not holding my back then*! And that's at stock speeds
*in a 15 year old synthetic benchmark
Yeah, cpu is at stock clock speed. The gpu is asus strix version of 1080ti, so it is overclocked a bit. I have 16Gb kit of 2400Mhz ddr3 and it can't handle at 2400Mhz if I overclock the cpu and I get blue screen with any cpu overclock.
wrote:When I saw the previous post, I just wanted to see how much bottleneck the cpu would be while having the same cpu and faster graphics card. So I ran the 3dmark03 with my main desktop pc as well to see the difference.
Hey, someone finally beat my score on the first page. Very cool! 😀
"A little sign-in here, a touch of WiFi there..."
wrote:wrote:When I saw the previous post, I just wanted to see how much bottleneck the cpu would be while having the same cpu and faster graphics card. So I ran the 3dmark03 with my main desktop pc as well to see the difference.
Hey, someone finally beat my score on the first page. Very cool! 😀
This thread probably isn't meant for testing modern pcs though. PCs are getting faster really slowly nowadays though. Like my 5 years old pc with 4770k cpu still works fine with modern games and after I upgraded the gpu to 1080ti last year, I probably don't have build a new pc before 2020. I used to have to build a new pc every 3 years. If anyone happens to have a faster cpu, it would be interesting to see how much of a bottleneck 4770k is with 1080ti in 3dmark03.
Not many laptops can fully run 3DMark03 on Windows 98SE, my newly aquired IBM ThinkPad T42p is one of them 😜
Test 1 score seems very low though 😒
Haswell's HD4600 integrated graphics in a Lenovo ThinkCentre. I'm actually very impressed with the performance! Keep in mind this is using cheap CL11 DDR3-1600; it would probably do much better with DDR3-2400, but I was too lazy to borrow that RAM from my main system.
"A little sign-in here, a touch of WiFi there..."
Modern PC, Windows 98 SE, and not so modern GPUs 😜 (people should do more 3DMark03 v350 on 98SE in my taste...I am crazy, I know 😜)
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm03/6539830
If I put a little effort in I could probably push it to 200k.
Don't think I've ever posted this screenshot, 3DMark03 98SE world record? (from 30.10.2017)
Huawei Matebook D 14 (AMD)
Ryzen 5 2500U APU with Radeon Vega 8