VOGONS


First post, by zehef

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Hello,
I found this PCI card in a local shop for 20$ : Matrox G450 MMS (up to 4screens). No box but it has the full video adapters and the card is in a very good condition.
Is this card better than a classic G450 ? (Except for the 4 screen capability, cause I'm going to use 1-2 monitors anyway)
I can't find a gaming review of this model, it seems like it wasn't very popular...
This card has a fan VS passive cooling for the original one.

I know that the G400 MAX performs the best but I can't find one...
Do you think that this G450 MMS is a good deal ?

Reply 1 of 14, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

More or less like Matrox G450 PCI. Performance should be on par with normal Matrox G400 in games without PCI bus bottleneck.

it seems like it wasn't very popular..

It's a niche card to display image on multiple panels. Why it should be?

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 2 of 14, by zehef

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

If its somewhat equal to the g450, and I don't need the 4 screens, I better keep looking for the g400 max then !
Thank you

Reply 3 of 14, by derSammler

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

The G450 is a little bit slower than a G400, but all in all, it's a good card. 20$ is too much for it imho, however, especially if you are not going to use the 4-monitor feature. A stock G450 already supports 2 monitors.

Reply 4 of 14, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

20 bucko for 450MMS with adapters included is a steal.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 5 of 14, by zehef

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I can find the classic G450 for 10$
So not sure about the price of the 450 MMS

Reply 6 of 14, by SirNickity

User metadata
Rank Oldbie
Rank
Oldbie

Pretty sure I paid more than that just to get the breakout cable for my 550.

Reply 7 of 14, by zehef

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

It has all these cables. May reconsider the deal. If the price is fair I can keep it until I get the G400 MAX (one day maybe :'( )

Reply 8 of 14, by The Serpent Rider

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++

Good stuff.

I must be some kind of standard: the anonymous gangbanger of the 21st century.

Reply 9 of 14, by aaronkatrini

User metadata
Rank Member
Rank
Member

For gaming no. This card won't use its 4 "cores" like a Sli card like Voodoo 5 or Fury MAXX would. Instead it can run 4 instances simultaneously.
Still for $20, out of curiosity, since it also comes with the cables, you should consider if you'd use it or keep in the collection.

Reply 10 of 14, by zehef

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Thanks for the advice guys. I bought the card. I may use it in the future and it should be great as a tempo card anyway 😀

Reply 11 of 14, by elmatero

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

Does anyone know if this card work under Windows 98?

ATX 1998 build: IBM 6x86MX-PR266@208 MHz on Tekram P5MVP-A4, 128MB SDRAM, Martrox G200 8MB, AZtech SC16, Windows 98FE

Reply 12 of 14, by chinny22

User metadata
Rank l33t++
Rank
l33t++
elmatero wrote on 2024-03-27, 07:31:

Does anyone know if this card work under Windows 98?

Doesnt look like it
https://video.matrox.com/en/apps/drivers/grap … %2C43&dualhead=

Seems like MMS 200 was the last with Win9x support.
https://video.matrox.com/en/apps/drivers/grap … previous/legacy

Normal G450 still supports win9x. Maybe you can use the driver but loose support for the extra screens?
https://www.philscomputerlab.com/drivers-for-matrox.html

Reply 13 of 14, by 386SX

User metadata
Rank l33t
Rank
l33t

That's a huge bridge chip package. Anyway I'd imagine it to be only a bit slower than the usual G450 that is an excellent Directx6/7 oriented card. It's not fast but very well built indeed.

Reply 14 of 14, by elmatero

User metadata
Rank Newbie
Rank
Newbie

I had tested it out and G450 MMS actualy work in Windows 98. To get it work I had to update card bios (to newest one), and insert it in 4-th PCI port (bottom one, on 430tx motherboard).
Then in windows 98 system detects PCI to PCI Bridge and instal for it standard driver. After this four independent graphic adapter were detected.
Matrox installers didn't recognize this card. I had to manually point G450 inf file, and then, also manually select G450 model. I went with Matrox Millennium G450 DualHead DVI PCI .
After Windows restart it looks as a normal Matrox G450 card. I have tested DirectDraw and Direct3D, OpenGl and nothing crash 😀

ATX 1998 build: IBM 6x86MX-PR266@208 MHz on Tekram P5MVP-A4, 128MB SDRAM, Martrox G200 8MB, AZtech SC16, Windows 98FE